How does Acts 26:28 reflect on the power of personal testimony in evangelism? Canonical Text “Then Agrippa said to Paul, ‘Can you persuade me in such a short time to become a Christian?’” — Acts 26:28 Literary Setting Paul stands before Herod Agrippa II and Roman governor Festus in Caesarea (Acts 25–26). After recounting his life, persecution of the Church, encounter with the risen Christ on the Damascus road (Acts 9; 26:12-18), and his obedience to the heavenly vision, Paul appeals to the shared Jewish expectation of resurrection “based on what the prophets and Moses said would happen” (26:22-23). Agrippa’s response crystallizes the scene: the prisoner’s personal story nearly persuades a king. Historical and Archaeological Corroboration • The Herodian palace auditorium at Caesarea Maritima, excavated 1993-2003, matches Josephus’ description (Ant. 19.343), situating Luke’s courtroom narrative in verifiable space. • Inscriptional evidence for Agrippa II (e.g., J. CF. Th. 3, no. 333) affirms his reign (AD 48-c. 93), aligning precisely with Acts’ chronology. • The Bema stone in Corinth (Acts 18:12-17) and Sergius Paulus inscription in Cyprus (Acts 13:7) substantiate Luke’s pattern of courtroom accuracy, lending credence to this hearing as well. Theological Focus: Testimony as Witness Scripture presents λογος (reasoned word) and μαρτυρία (witness). Paul blends both: 1. Eyewitness report of the risen Jesus (26:13-15). 2. Fulfillment of prophecy (26:22-23; cf. Isaiah 53; Psalm 16:10). 3. Experiential transformation—from persecutor to preacher (26:9-11,19-20). The pattern echoes earlier biblical instances: • John 4:39—“Many Samaritans believed because of the woman’s testimony.” • Mark 5:19—Jesus commands the healed demoniac, “Tell them what the Lord has done for you.” • Revelation 12:11—Believers “overcame by the blood of the Lamb and by the word of their testimony.” Psychological and Behavioral Dynamics Contemporary persuasion research (narrative transportation theory; Green & Brock, 2000) confirms that stories bypass mere cognition and evoke empathy, facilitating attitude change. Paul’s autobiographical narrative models this: he invites Agrippa to rehearse shared Jewish memory and then confronts him with personal transformation, leveraging credibility (ethos), logic (logos), and emotion (pathos). The near-conversion of Agrippa illustrates narrative potency. The Role of the Holy Spirit Acts 1:8 promises power to be “witnesses.” The Greek μάρτυρες (martyrs) underscores that testimony is Spirit-empowered truth-telling. Luke portrays the Spirit guiding Paul’s speech (cf. Luke 12:11-12; Acts 26:22). Conversion remains the Spirit’s work (John 16:8-11), but He customarily employs human testimony as instrument. Practical Application for Evangelism Today 1. Anchor your story in objective gospel facts (death, burial, resurrection). 2. Be concise—Paul needed only moments. 3. Connect with your listener’s worldview, as Paul did with Agrippa’s Jewish background. 4. Appeal to fulfilled prophecy and historical reliability; back narrative with evidence (Isaiah Scroll, Dead Sea Scrolls AD 125 BCE proving Messianic texts pre-date Christ). 5. Expect varied responses—Festus scoffs (Acts 26:24), Agrippa hesitates, yet seeds are planted (cf. Acts 11:19-26). Integration with Intelligent Design Paul’s argument in Romans 1:20—creation reveals God’s invisible qualities—parallels his courtroom defense. Modern specified complexity in DNA (Meyer, Signature in the Cell) offers empirical resonance: just as Paul’s changed life pointed to divine intervention, coded information in biology points to a Designer. Both serve evangelistic testimony, one personal, one scientific. Conclusion Acts 26:28 captures the climactic moment when a Spirit-energized personal testimony, grounded in prophetic fulfillment and historical fact, nearly converts a king. Scripture, psychology, and experience converge: stories of encounter with the risen Christ remain God’s ordained means to draw hearts. Tell yours—briefly, boldly, and tethered to the incontrovertible Word—and trust the Spirit to move modern Agrippas from “almost” to “altogether.” |
    |