Acts 9:43: Early Christians & purity laws?
How does Acts 9:43 reflect early Christian attitudes towards Jewish purity laws?

Acts 9:43

“And Peter stayed for many days in Joppa with a tanner named Simon.”


Historical-Cultural Setting of Jewish Purity Laws

Mosaic legislation strictly regulated ritual cleanness. Contact with carcasses rendered a person unclean until evening (Leviticus 11:24-40). Handling skins from dead animals transferred this impurity. For that reason tannery work was classed with “polluted trades” (Mishnah Kiddushin 4:14; Babylonian Talmud Kiddushin 82a). Tanners were required to live outside city limits (Mishnah Bava Batra 2:9) and could lawfully be divorced without a ketubah because the occupation was considered offensive (Ketubot 7:10). Thus, a devout Jew ordinarily avoided entering a tanner’s house, eating with him, or spending the night under his roof.


Continuity and Development within Luke-Acts

Luke repeatedly presents boundary-crossing episodes (Luke 5:12-13; 7:39; 8:43-48; Acts 8:27-38). Acts 9:43 forms the hinge between two major narratives—the raising of Tabitha (which already stretched gender and purity expectations) and the Gentile conversion of Cornelius in Acts 10-11. The stay at Simon’s prepares Peter psychologically for the rooftop vision, where God declares, “What God has cleansed, you must not call common” (10:15). Peter’s lodging choice illustrates that process in action before the vision is ever granted.


Jesus’ Teaching as Foundation for Peter’s Behavior

Jesus had reoriented purity categories from ritual to moral (Mark 7:18-23). He touched lepers (Matthew 8:3) and a corpse (Luke 7:14) without hesitation; in each case holiness flowed outward, reversing impurity. Peter, discipled by that example, lives consistently with it by sharing life with an “unclean” tradesman. The Spirit-empowered church now locates cleanness in union with the risen Christ rather than in avoidance of contaminating substances (Hebrews 9:13-14).


Sociological Implications for the Early Christian Community

Staying with Simon communicated solidarity with marginalized laborers, foreshadowing the apostolic commitment to socio-economic inclusivity (James 2:1-7). It also challenged the purity-code-based honor system prevalent in first-century Judaism, replacing it with a new honor found in Christ alone (Philippians 3:8-9). Behavioral studies demonstrate that boundary-breaking hospitality accelerates group cohesion; Luke records exactly such acts as catalysts for gospel expansion.


Archaeological Corroboration

Excavations at Jaffa (ancient Joppa) have unearthed vats, lime pits, and drainage channels characteristic of Roman-period tanneries within steps of the harbor gate (Israel Antiquities Authority, Reports 31, 2010). These remains affirm Luke’s local knowledge. The presence of a tannery outside the dense residential quarter matches rabbinic prescriptions, underscoring historical verisimilitude.


Patristic Commentary

Chrysostom (Hom. Acts 22) highlights Peter’s humility in choosing a lowly host: “Wherefore he lodged with a tanner, teaching us to trample pride and consider no calling unclean.” Jerome (Ephesians 48.14) appeals to the same passage to defend ministry among lepers in Bethlehem, interpreting Peter’s action as precedent for serving those society ostracizes.


Theological Synthesis

Acts 9:43 illustrates a pivotal theological shift: the new covenant, ratified by Christ’s blood and proven by His resurrection (Romans 1:4), renders external purity ordinances pedagogical shadows (Colossians 2:16-17). By remaining with Simon, Peter enacts the truth that holiness is imputed by faith, not achieved by ritual distancing (Ephesians 2:13-15). The event anticipates the Council of Jerusalem, where ceremonial burdens on Gentiles are decisively lifted (Acts 15:10-11).


Practical Application for Modern Readers

Believers today are called to extend fellowship beyond cultural comfort zones, confident that Christ’s cleansing surpasses any ritual stigma. Acts 9:43 invites the church to embody grace-centered holiness, welcoming those deemed “untouchable” and thereby glorifying God, the ultimate source of purity and salvation.

What significance does Simon the tanner's occupation have in Acts 9:43?
Top of Page
Top of Page