How does the "Book of the Acts of Solomon" relate to biblical authority? Setting the Scene “Now the rest of the acts of Solomon— all that he did, as well as his wisdom— are they not written in the Book of the Acts of Solomon?” (1 Kings 11:41) What Is the Book of the Acts of Solomon? • A historical record of Solomon’s reign, now lost. • Likely kept by royal scribes, much like the “Annals of the Kings of Israel” (1 Kings 14:19) and other court chronicles. • Cited only here, suggesting the inspired author drew on reliable records to compose 1 Kings. Why Does Scripture Cite a Non-Biblical Source? • To confirm historical accuracy—showing that the biblical account can be verified by known documents of the day. • To remind readers that God’s Word engages real history, not myth (cf. Luke 1:1-4). • To demonstrate that inspiration does not require the inclusion of every available detail; the Spirit guided writers to select what serves His purpose (John 20:30-31). Does This Undermine Biblical Authority? • No. Authority rests on divine inspiration, not on exclusivity of information sources (2 Timothy 3:16-17). • The Spirit used human research without compromising inerrancy—just as Solomon employed builders yet the temple remained “for the name of the LORD” (1 Kings 5:5). • The lost record’s absence underscores God’s preservation of what He deems sufficient; nothing essential is missing (Deuteronomy 29:29). Key Takeaways • Scripture stands complete even when it references materials we no longer possess. • External sources can corroborate, but never correct, God’s Word. • Trust the canon God preserved; He has given “all things that pertain to life and godliness” (2 Peter 1:3). Practical Implications for Us Today • Approach historical studies with confidence—faith is not afraid of evidence. • Let Scripture remain the final arbiter; compare all sources to its truth (Acts 17:11). • Rest in the sufficiency of the Bible for doctrine, reproof, correction, and training in righteousness. |
    |