Why did Amasa delay in 2 Samuel 20:5, and what were the consequences? The Mission from King David “Then the king said to Amasa, ‘Summon the men of Judah to come to me within three days, and be present yourself.’ ” (2 Samuel 20:4) • Time limit: three days. • Purpose: raise Judah’s army to crush Sheba’s rebellion before it spread. Why Did Amasa Delay? “ So Amasa went to summon Judah, but he took longer than the time allotted to him.” (2 Samuel 20:5) Scripture states the fact, not the motive. From the surrounding text and historical context we can reasonably note: • Former loyalties: Amasa had just led Absalom’s army (2 Samuel 17:25). Judah’s soldiers may have been slow to rally behind their recent foe, requiring extra persuasion. • Logistical strain: three days to muster a tribal army from scattered towns was ambitious even under ideal conditions. • Questioned authority: Joab had long held command. Some troops likely hesitated to follow a new general they scarcely knew. • Possible hesitation: Amasa may have sensed Joab’s hostility; gathering troops slowly could have been an unconscious stall born of fear or uncertainty. Whatever the blend of factors, the literal record is clear: he missed the deadline. Immediate Consequences • David acted: “Then the king said to Abishai, ‘Now Sheba son of Bichri will do us more harm than Absalom did. Take my lord’s servants and pursue him.’ ” (2 Samuel 20:6) • Joab joined Abishai, regaining de-facto command. • Amasa finally arrived at Gibeon, alone and unprotected (20:8). • Joab murdered him with a concealed sword stroke (20:9–10). • The army stopped briefly but then followed Joab, leaving Amasa’s body on the road (20:11-13). Long-Term Consequences • Joab restored as commander—despite David’s earlier demotion. • Sheba advanced farther north, gathering Benjamin and the northern tribes, prolonging the rebellion (20:14-15). • Additional bloodshed: the siege of Abel-beth-maacah became necessary before Sheba was finally executed (20:22). • David’s plan to unify the kingdom under Amasa collapsed; mistrust and rivalry within the army deepened. • Amasa’s lineage and influence ended abruptly—he never fulfilled the high post David had allotted. Takeaways for Disciples Today • Obedience without delay matters; missed deadlines open doors to greater trouble (cf. Proverbs 13:4; James 4:17). • Spiritual authority must be coupled with credibility; past alliances can hinder present assignments. • Indecision in leadership invites others—sometimes the wrong others—to seize control (cf. 1 Kings 18:21). • God’s purposes move forward, yet personal disobedience brings personal loss; Amasa’s delay did not thwart God’s kingdom plan, but it cost him his life and testimony. |
    |