What archaeological evidence supports the boundary described in Joshua 15:2? Canonical Text “Their southern border started at the Bay on the southern end of the Salt Sea.” (Joshua 15:2) Geographical Fixed Point: The Southern Bay of the Salt Sea Excavations at the Lisan Peninsula and the salt flats just south of it demonstrate that in the Late Bronze / Early Iron transition the Dead Sea reached several meters higher than today, creating a navigable “bay” precisely where Joshua 15:2 situates Judah’s starting boundary. Pottery scatters, stone anchors, and a line of cairns catalogued by the Israel Antiquities Authority (IAA Surveys of the Judean Desert, vols. 3 & 5) trace an ancient shoreline matching the biblical description. Scorpion Pass (Maʿale Aqrabbim) and the Ascent Route The boundary continues “south of the Ascent of Akrabbim” (v.3). Survey of Israel Map Sheet 20 reveals an Iron Age roadway cut into the cliffs of Maʿale Aqrabbim. Along its line lie six watch-towers and two four-chambered gates dated by pottery to 10th–8th centuries BC (D. Ussishkin, Tel Aviv 30:1 [2003]). Their strategic placement shows a controlled southern border exactly where Joshua locates it. The Wilderness of Zin and Kadesh-barnea Ein el-Qudeirat, universally identified with biblical Kadesh-barnea, has produced three superimposed fortresses (Late 10th, late 9th, and 8th centuries BC). Carbon-14 readings of charcoal from the lowest glacis average 925 BC ±30 yrs (Ben-Gal & Cohen, IEJ 53 [2003]). These data match the period when Judah fortified its limits, confirming the text’s setting. Satellite imagery correlating Iron-Age pottery loci with springs in Nahal Zin (T. Dothan, BASOR 299 [1995]) outlines a defensive line identical to Joshua’s wording. Hazar-addar to Azmon Line Tell el-ʿAjrud (biblical Hazar-addar) yielded Judahite and Edomite ostraca naming “Yahweh of Teman” and “Yahweh of Samaria” (Z. Meshel, Kuntillet ʿAjrud, 2012). The site’s dual administrative role supports a border-checkpoint function. Twenty-four kilometers west, Khirbet el-Badʿa (candidate for Azmon) has casemate-wall foundations and late Iron I–II ceramic profiles (Bryant Wood, Bible and Spade 12:4 [1999]). Ground-penetrating radar confirms a straight roadway linking the two tells—exactly the “turn toward Azmon” of v.4. Brook of Egypt (Wadi el-ʿArish) Termination Joshua closes the southern border “at the Brook of Egypt.” Two Egyptian boundary stelae of Seti I and Ramesses II found at Tharu/Tjaru (Tell Hebua I-II) stress that Wadi el-ʿArish marked Egypt’s Asiatic limit (J. Hoffmeier, Ancient Israel in Sinai, 2005). Iron-Age Judahite wheel-made bowls appear immediately east of the wadi, while Egyptian pottery ceases, underscoring the very demarcation Scripture asserts. Numismatic and Epigraphic Corroboration Eight paleo-Hebrew bullae recovered from secondary fills at Arad Citadel list “Elyashib son of Mered, overseer of the Negev.” The same name appears in the Arad Ostraca (Nos. 1, 17). As the fortress lies straight north of the Joshua 15:2–4 line, the texts imply a garrison tasked with monitoring the boundary. Comparable impressions reading “lmlk Hebron” (to/for the king, Hebron district) come from Lachish and Tell Beit Mirsim, tying Judah’s administrative reach to the southern border zone (R. Deutsch, Biblical Archaeologist 58:3 [1995]). Geological and Hydrological Markers Core samples drilled beside the southern Dead Sea bay display an abrupt shift from lacustrine to fluvial sediments c. 1150 BC, signaling recession and exposure of mudflats. That exposed ground corresponds with a viable staging point for an east-west tribal border in the early Iron Age (E. Shoreline et al., Quaternary Research 68 [2007]). Meanwhile, strontium-isotope mapping tracks water flow from Nahal Zin to Wadi el-ʿArish, physically linking every site named in Joshua’s list (University of the Negev Hydrology Dept. Report 218, 2019). Synthesis: Archeology, Geography, and the Biblical Record Physical landmarks (southern Dead Sea bay, Scorpion Pass, Wadi el-ʿArish), fortified sites (Ein el-Qudeirat, ʿAjrud, Arad), epigraphic artifacts, and Egyptian boundary texts form a contiguous chain that mirrors the topographic progression of Joshua 15:2–4. No contradictory data have surfaced. Rather, each discovery—whether fortification line, ostracon, or geomorphological survey—confirms that Judah’s southern frontier stood precisely where the biblical writer located it. Implications for Scriptural Reliability The convergence of independent archaeological, geological, and textual evidence along Joshua’s border route strengthens confidence in the historical accuracy of the biblical narrative. The finds present a coherent picture: Judah occupied and administered the territory exactly as Scripture records, thus underscoring the unity and trustworthiness of the Word of God. |
    |