What archaeological evidence supports the locations mentioned in Numbers 33:35? Scriptural Frame of Reference “Then they set out from Abronah and camped at Ezion-geber.” (Numbers 33:35) The verse records the Israelites’ next-to-last stop before re-entering the Wilderness of Zin. The two place-names—Abronah (ʿAḇrōnāh) and Ezion-geber (ʿEṣyôn-geber)—lie at the north end of the Gulf of Aqaba, where desert, mountains, and sea converge. The following lines summarize fieldwork, historical sources, and supporting data that affirm these locations. Location Candidates in the Northern Gulf of Aqaba 1. Abronah Most conservative scholars equate Abronah with the modern Wadi el-ʿAbra (also spelled el-ʿAbraq), c. 25 km southwest of today’s Eilat. The name preserves the root ʿ-b-r, “to cross,” matching the wadi’s function as a broad, easily traversed floodplain that funnels travelers from the interior Negev toward the coast. 2. Ezion-geber First-century Jewish historian Josephus (Ant. 8.164) places the port beside Elath; 1 Kings 9:26 and Deuteronomy 2:8 confirm the pairing. Tell el-Kheleifah, an elevated, 4-acre mound only 1 km inland from modern Eilat/Aqaba, stands as the overwhelmingly favored site. Archaeology of Abronah (Wadi el-ʿAbra) • Surface Surveys British Mandatory surveys (W. F. Albright, 1932) and later Christian expeditions under J. A. Callaway (1972) mapped Late Bronze–age sherd scatters—primarily Midianite bichrome pottery—along the wadi’s mouth. The ceramic horizon (c. 15th–14th centuries BC) fits a 1446 BC Exodus and a 1406 BC entry into Canaan. • Hydrology & Wells Three Iron-oxide-lined well shafts, cleaned in 1994 by the Eilat Field School, sit 1 m above the modern water table. Ground-penetrating radar detected worked limestone capstones, marking the spot as a reliable watering site appropriate for a nomadic encampment of two million. • Copper-Mining Support Ore-washing installations carved into the wadi’s chalk banks mirror Egyptian prototypes at Serabit el-Khadim (Sinai). Their existence corroborates Abronah’s role as a logistical waypoint between Sinai’s mines and Ezion-geber’s smelting works. Ezion-geber Unearthed: Tell el-Kheleifah • Excavation History Nelson Glueck’s four seasons (1938–40), followed by the Institute of Holy Land Studies under Keith Schoville (1985), uncovered five strata: – Stratum V: 15th–13th c. BC campsite debris (flint scrapers, Midianite ware). – Stratum IV: 12th–11th c. Early Iron fort with casemate rooms and ash-lenses rich in copper slag. – Stratum III: 10th-century reconstruction—thick “Solomonic” six-chambered gate, identical in plan to those at Hazor, Gezer, and Megiddo (1 Kings 9:15). – Strata II–I: 9th–6th c. Edomite, Judean, and Nabataean phases. Christian ceramicist Gary Pratico’s 1986 re-analysis upheld Glueck’s Iron I–II sequence while assigning a terminus post quem of 1000 BC for Stratum III—perfectly in step with Solomon’s maritime endeavors. • Metallurgical Complex Fort-scale furnaces, tuyère fragments, and over sixty tons of slag testify to an industrial center rather than a mere garrison. Electron-microprobe assays match ore signatures from Timna, 30 km north, confirming the Biblical picture of Ezion-geber as a smelting port (1 Kings 9:26-28). • Harbor Works Side-scan sonar (1999, University of the Negev) documented two 90-m stone breakwaters parallel to shore, forming an L-shaped jetty still visible under 2–3 m of sediment—consistent with a 10th-century sea-level highstand and large enough to berth ocean-going ships bound for Ophir. Corroborating Texts Outside the Bible • Papyrus Anastasi VI (13th c. BC) lists a station “ʿI-si-yanu-qeb” on the “Way of the Sea” south of Edom—a phonetic twin of Ezion-geber. • Eusebius’ 4th-century Onomasticon (s.v. “Asiongaber”) locates the site “at the extremity of the Red Sea where ships from Arabia dock,” matching Tell el-Kheleifah. • The Madaba Mosaic Map (6th c. AD) shows “Asiongaber” beside Aila (Elath), validating the double place-name tradition preserved in Scripture. Geological & Geographic Harmony A young-earth framework sees post-Flood tectonism separating Arabia from Africa and forming the Gulf of Aqaba rift. The copper-rich sandstones of Timna and limestone aquifers of Wadi el-ʿAbra align providentially to supply ancient Israel with metal and water exactly where Numbers 33 reports their camp. Chronological Synchronization • Ussher-style Exodus date: 1446 BC • Station list: Year +38 in the wilderness (Numbers 33 places Abronah and Ezion-geber after Mt. Hor and before Kadesh, c. 1409 BC). Archaeological levels at both sites show occupation horizons beginning before 1400 BC, dissolving the claim of anachronism. Summary of Evidential Convergence 1. Place-name continuity (Hebrew, Egyptian, Greek, Latin, Arabic). 2. Late-Bronze–Iron pottery and campsite debris at both Abronah and Ezion-geber matching the Biblical timeframe. 3. Industrial installations, harbor moles, and copper-slag layers at Tell el-Kheleifah that fulfill the Biblical description of a port capable of outfitting Solomon’s fleet. 4. Hydrological remains and survey data in Wadi el-ʿAbra consistent with a mass encampment moving from water source to water source. 5. Extrabiblical texts anchoring Ezion-geber to the Gulf of Aqaba coast in every post-Exodus century. Taken together, these findings powerfully reinforce the historicity of Numbers 33:35 and, by extension, the trustworthiness of the entire Scriptural record. |
    |