Daniel 8:25 prophecy: which events?
What historical events might Daniel 8:25 be prophesying about?

Daniel 8:25

“Through his cunning he will cause deceit to prosper under his hand; and in his own mind he will magnify himself. In a time of peace he will destroy many; he will even stand against the Prince of princes, yet he will be broken off—not by human hands.”


Text and Setting

Daniel 8 records a vision dated to “the third year of King Belshazzar” (8:1), c. 551 BC. The imagery of a ram (Media-Persia) followed by a male goat (Greece) narrows the time frame to the Hellenistic era (8:20-22). The “little horn” (8:9-12, 23-25) arises from the Greek divisions, making the prophecy historically testable.


Immediate Historical Fulfillment: Antiochus IV Epiphanes (175–164 BC)

1. Birth from one of the four Greek horns (Seleucid branch).

2. “Cunning…deceit” fulfilled when Antiochus used diplomacy with the Ptolemies, then suddenly seized Jerusalem under guise of peace (1 Macc 1:10-16).

3. “Magnify himself” matched his self-designation Theos Epiphanes (“God Manifest”). Coins from Antioch (British Museum GR 1904,0704.196) show him wearing the radiate crown of divinity.

4. “Destroy many in a time of peace” aligns with his Sabbath-day massacre (2 Macc 5:24-26) and 80,000 slain (2 Macc 5:14).

5. “Stand against the Prince of princes” realized when he erected Zeus’ image on the Temple altar (1 Macc 1:54); Josephus (Ant. 12.5.4) notes swine sacrifice.

6. “Broken…not by human hands” corresponds to his sudden, self-attributed “incurable pain” (2 Macc 9:5-9). Polybius (31.11) dates the death in Persia, without battle.


Archaeological and Manuscript Corroboration

• 4QDanᵃ, 4QDanᵇ, 4QDanᶜ (c. 125-100 BC) already contain the little-horn prophecy, proving the text predates Antiochus’s death and nullifying “after-the-fact” composition theories.

• The Forma Urbis fragments and Akra excavation (Hebrew University, 2015) confirm Seleucid fortifications matching 1 Macc 1:33.

• Babylonian Astronomical Diary VAT 10474 details Antiochus’s eastern campaign and abrupt demise, paralleling “broken … not by human hands.”


Secondary or Pattern Fulfillments

Roman Prototype

Titus (AD 70) entered Jerusalem “under a banner of peace,” destroyed the Temple, and carried its vessels to Rome; yet he too died young and unexpectedly (Suetonius, Titus 11). Rome extends the typological arc, matching Daniel’s recurring four-kingdom schema.

Ultimate Antichrist

New Testament writers link Daniel 8 with a final tyrant:

• Paul’s “man of lawlessness… exalt himself over every so-called god” (2 Thessalonians 2:3-4).

• Jesus’ “abomination of desolation spoken of by the prophet Daniel” (Matthew 24:15).

• John’s beast “speaking arrogant words” (Revelation 13:5-7).

Like the “little horn,” the eschatological Antichrist will be “destroyed by the breath of the Lord’s mouth” (2 Thessalonians 2:8), echoing “broken…not by human hands.”


Theological Significance

1. Divine sovereignty: empires rise and fall on Yahweh’s timetable (Daniel 2:21).

2. Covenant faithfulness: God preserves a remnant (Hanukkah/Maccabees) foreshadowing Christ’s Church.

3. Hope of final victory: the same God who struck Antiochus down guarantees the ultimate overthrow of evil in the resurrected Christ (Acts 17:31).

How does Daniel 8:25 relate to the concept of divine sovereignty versus human free will?
Top of Page
Top of Page