How does 2 Chronicles 32:31 challenge the idea of God's constant presence? Canonical Setting and Immediate Context 2 Chronicles 32:31 reads: “However, when the envoys of the rulers of Babylon were sent to him to inquire about the sign that had occurred in the land, God left him to test him and to know what was in his heart.” The verse forms the coda to a trilogy of events in Hezekiah’s life (32:24-31): 1. A mortal illness followed by miraculous healing (vv. 24-26; cf. Isaiah 38). 2. Divine intervention against Sennacherib (vv. 20-23; cf. the Sennacherib Prism and Hezekiah’s Tunnel inscription). 3. A diplomatic visit from Babylon (v. 31; parallel 2 Kings 20:12-19). Chronologically—using a conservative Ussher-style timeline—Hezekiah’s sickness and the Babylonian visit fall c. 703–702 BC, a decade before Judah’s first deportations. The “sign” was the retrogression of the shadow on Ahaz’s sundial (2 Kings 20:9-11), confirmed by both Chronicles and Kings, thus situating the narrative within a historically verifiable reign documented by Assyrian records. Perceived Tension: Divine Omnipresence versus Apparent Withdrawal Scripture affirms both God’s omnipresence and His capacity to veil that presence: Omnipresence— • “Where can I go from Your Spirit? … even there Your hand will guide me” (Psalm 139:7-10). • “I will never leave you nor forsake you” (Deuteronomy 31:6; reiterated Hebrews 13:5). Hiddenness— • “Truly You are a God who hides Himself” (Isaiah 45:15). • “My God, my God, why have You forsaken Me?” (Psalm 22:1; Matthew 27:46). Thus, 2 Chronicles 32:31 does not negate omnipresence; it illustrates God’s pedagogical concealment, a motif sometimes called hester panim (“hiding of the face”) in Jewish theology. Biblical Theology of Testing From Eden to Gethsemane, divine testing surfaces repeatedly: • Abraham: “God tested Abraham” (Genesis 22:1). • Israel in the wilderness: “to humble you and to test you to know what was in your heart” (Deuteronomy 8:2). • Job: God permits Satan’s sifting (Job 1–2). • Hezekiah: the Babylonian envoys episode is a heart-revealing test. • New-Covenant believers: “the testing of your faith produces perseverance” (James 1:3). These episodes share three constants: 1. God never forfeits sovereignty. 2. Testing reveals, refines, and readies the tested. 3. Divine presence persists, though the experiential sense of that presence may diminish. Manifest Presence versus Essential Presence Early Church fathers (e.g., Athanasius, Augustine) distinguished praesentia secundum potentiam (presence in power/being) from praesentia secundum gratiam (presence in fellowship). Scripture echoes that distinction: • Essential Presence: “In Him all things hold together” (Colossians 1:17). • Manifest Presence: “My Presence will go with you, and I will give you rest” (Exodus 33:14). 2 Chronicles 32:31 concerns the latter. God steps back relationally so Hezekiah’s latent pride (32:25) surfaces, prompting repentance and instructing Judah (32:26). Covenantal and Redemptive-Historical Considerations Pre-Pentecost saints experienced the Spirit upon them, not yet permanently indwelling (John 14:17). Consequently, visible withdrawal motifs appear (e.g., 1 Samuel 16:14 regarding Saul). Post-resurrection believers receive the Spirit as a guarantee (Ephesians 1:13-14), rendering permanent abandonment impossible. Christ’s resurrection—“He is not here; He has risen!” (Luke 24:6)—secures the believer’s standing. The Spirit’s seal (2 Corinthians 1:22) fulfills Yahweh’s pledge never to forsake His own, even if He occasionally veils His felt presence for sanctification. Pastoral and Behavioral Implications Periods of felt distance can: • Expose pride, as with Hezekiah. • Cultivate reliance on grace, not gifts. • Deepen experiential knowledge of God’s constancy once the veil lifts (cf. Psalm 30:7). Empirical psychology of faith development (e.g., Fowler’s stages) confirms that “dark nights” often precede mature, resilient belief. Christological Fulfillment and New-Covenant Assurance Jesus embodies both the full presence of God (John 1:14) and the temporary experience of forsakenness on the cross, absorbing divine wrath so believers never will. Post-resurrection, He promises: “Surely I am with you always, to the very end of the age” (Matthew 28:20). Answering the Initial Question 2 Chronicles 32:31 does not challenge God’s constant presence; it clarifies it. The verse illustrates that God may withdraw the tangible sense of His presence to reveal a person’s heart, yet He remains ontologically omnipresent, sovereign, and committed to His covenant people. Any apparent contradiction dissolves once we differentiate between: 1. God’s essential, sustaining presence in all creation. 2. God’s manifest, relational presence that He may modulate for purposes of testing, discipline, and growth. Therefore, the passage affirms—rather than undermines—the broader biblical testimony of an ever-present, all-wise God who lovingly trains His children by sometimes stepping into the shadows. |
    |