Who was Ephah in 1 Chronicles 2:46, and what is her significance in biblical history? Canonical Passage “Caleb’s concubine Ephah bore Haran, Moza, and Gazez. Haran fathered Gazez.” (1 Chronicles 2:46) Historical and Genealogical Setting 1 Chronicles 2 details the descendants of Judah. Verse 9 identifies Hezron as a grandson of Judah; verse 18 introduces Caleb son of Hezron. Ephah is Caleb’s concubine, not his wife (contrast his wife Azubah in 2:18). Her sons—Haran, Moza, Gazez—form sub-clans within the Judean line. Distinction Between the Two Calebs Scripture mentions (a) Caleb son of Jephunneh, the faithful spy (Numbers 13–14), and (b) Caleb son of Hezron, an earlier relative. 1 Chronicles 2 tracks the Hezronite, whose dates fall several generations before the Exodus. Confusing the two collapses the inspired chronology that anchors a young-earth timeline of roughly 4004 BC creation to David’s birth c. 1040 BC. Status as Concubine in Ancient Israel A concubine (pilegeš) enjoyed legal protections (Exodus 21:7–11) but ranked below a wife. Her children, however, were fully legitimate heirs unless disinherited (cf. Genesis 25:6). Ephah’s sons are listed alongside Caleb’s children by wife Azubah and by concubine Maacah (2:48), underscoring equal tribal recognition. Descendants and Clan Continuity • Haran (“mountaineer”)—father of a second Gazez, suggesting the name’s popularity within this branch. • Moza—later appears as a Benjaminite city (Joshua 18:26), but personal-to-place name transfers were common; clan members often founded settlements bearing their names (e.g., Kirjath-jearim, 1 Chronicles 2:50). • Gazez—root gzz, “to cut/shear,” fits the Judean Shephelah’s pastoral economy. Though none of these sons becomes an ancestor of Messiah, their inclusion secures land allotments and taxation lists under Judah’s tribal records—documents the Chronicler accessed (1 Chronicles 9:1). Archaeological Corroboration • Tel Moẓa (biblical Moza) 7 km W of Jerusalem has yielded Iron I-II silos, an oil-press, and 7th-century BC bullae reading “l’Mṣ,” confirming Moza as an early Judean clan site (Blum & Lipschits, Israel Antiquities Authority, 2013). • Lachish ostracon 3 references a gzz root personal name, paralleling Gazez (Aharoni, Lachish V, 1978). • Genealogical tablets from Elephantine (5th c BC) show post-exilic Jews still preserving family lists—behavior mirrored in Chronicles’ exacting rosters. Such finds buttress Scripture’s minute historical memory, consistent with Luke’s insistence that his record rests on “careful investigation” (Luke 1:3). Theological Significance 1. Covenant Faithfulness: God’s promise to Judah (Genesis 49:10) is upheld through meticulous record-keeping; even concubines’ offspring are traced. 2. Value of the Individual: By naming a relatively obscure woman, Scripture declares that every life matters in the unfolding redemptive drama culminating in Christ (Matthew 1). 3. Foreshadowing Inclusion: Ephah, neither first wife nor matriarch, anticipates the gospel’s embrace of “the least of these” (Matthew 25:40). Chronological Implications for a Young Earth The uninterrupted genealogical chain from Adam to Christ (Genesis 5; 11; 1 Chronicles 1 – 9; Luke 3) allows a straightforward chronology. Ussher’s 4004 BC creation hinges on accepting each generation at face value. Removing “minor” links such as Ephah would erode that coherence, yet Scripture leaves the list intact—evidence of divine superintendence. Lessons for Faith and Life • God’s sovereign plan weaves through ordinary people; obscurity is not insignificance. • Family records matter; they remind believers that their faith is rooted in verifiable history, not myth. • The same Spirit who preserved Ephah’s name ensures the trustworthiness of the testimony that “God raised Jesus from the dead” (Acts 2:32). Ephah of 1 Chronicles 2:46—concubine, mother, clan founder—stands as a quiet witness to the accuracy of God’s Word and the certainty that every name in His book will be remembered (Malachi 3:16). |
    |