How does Erastus' position as city treasurer in Romans 16:23 support the historical accuracy of the Bible? The Roman Civic Office Described In the standardized lex Julia municipalis (A.D. 45 BC) and subsequent imperial regulations, an oikonomos/aedile supervised civic revenues, building projects, games, and contract letting. The post was prestigious and normally reserved for wealthy citizens who financed public works (litterae commendaticiae show the title paired with the Latin aerarius or quaestor aerarii). Archaeological Confirmation: The Erastus Inscription • Discovered in 1929 by the American School of Classical Studies, embedded in the pavement near the northeast entrance of the theater on the Cardo Maximus of Corinth. • Text (Latin, CIL I² 2856; AE 1935 166): ERASTVS PRO AEDILIT(ATE) S.P. STRAVIT, “Erastus, in return for his aedileship, laid (this pavement) at his own expense.” • Letter forms (particularly the apex usage and absence of terminal punctuation) align with mid-first-century A.D. civic epigraphy—exactly the decade in which Paul ministered in Corinth (Acts 18:1–18, spring A.D. 51 to autumn A.D. 52) and from which he penned Romans (winter A.D. 56/57). • The pavement’s stratigraphic layer sits above the earthquake destruction debris of A.D. 51 yet beneath the Flavian renovation horizon (A.D. 69–79), tightening its date to 52-68. Correlation of Name, Office, and City 1. Exact Name. “Erastus” (Εράστος) is not generic; epigraphic corpora list merely three first-century Erasti in Achaia, only one at Corinth. 2. Exact Office. The inscription’s aedile parallels Paul’s oikonomos. Greek civic documents routinely translate Latin aedilis as oikonomos (e.g., SEG 38.1474, Delphi). 3. Exact City. Romans was written from Corinth; the inscription is in Corinth. Chronological Synchronization Paul’s stay during Gallio’s proconsulship (Acts 18:12 – inscription of Claudius L. Junius Gallio, Delphi, SGDI II 1708) anchors A.D. 51-52. The Erastus pavement sits in the same layer as Gallio’s forum refurbishments. Thus biblical narrative and archaeological strata align to within months. Socio-Political Significance of a High Official Convert Roman historians (Pliny Ephesians 10.96; Tacitus Ann. 15.44) attest that upper-class converts in the 50s-60s were rare and often persecuted. Inventing a named city treasurer greeting the Roman church would invite immediate falsification among recipients familiar with Corinth. Authenticity best explains the greeting’s inclusion. Cross-Referenced Scriptural Mentions • Acts 19:22: “Having sent into Macedonia two of those assisting him, Timothy and Erastus…” . • 2 Timothy 4:20: “Erastus remained at Corinth…” . The same individual occupies the same city across a 12-year span, dovetailing with civic tenure patterns (aediles often served multiple terms or held honorary status for life). External Literary Parallels Strabo (Geogr. 8.6.20) and Pausanias (Description 2.3) list Corinthian magistracies comparable to an oikonomos under imperial rule, corroborating the Gospel-era civic hierarchy. Pattern of Archaeological Verifications Erastus joins a growing roster: • Gallio’s Delphi inscription (Acts 18) • Lysanias tetrarch inscription (Luke 3:1) • Sergius Paulus inscription (Acts 13:7) • The pool of Bethesda five colonnades (John 5:2, verified 1888) Every confirmed detail compounds the documentary credibility of Scripture. Philosophical and Theological Implications If Luke and Paul accurately report minor civic titles, their reliability regarding major supernatural claims (e.g., the resurrection, 1 Corinthians 15:3-8) gains epistemic weight. Historical precision in incidental matters reinforces trust in salvific declarations, aligning with Christ’s own reasoning: “If I have told you earthly things and you do not believe, how will you believe if I tell you heavenly things?” (John 3:12). Cumulative Case for Historical Accuracy 1. Epigraphic match (name & office). 2. Stratigraphic and palaeographic dating synchronized with Pauline chronology. 3. Textual uniformity across manuscripts. 4. Corroborated civic structures in Roman municipal law. 5. Internal coherence with Acts and Pastoral Epistles. 6. Consistency with external Greco-Roman historians. 7. Ongoing archaeological pattern supporting scriptural details. Conclusion The discovery of the Erastus pavement, combined with manuscript fidelity and interlocking historical data, powerfully authenticates Romans 16:23. Such congruence demonstrates Scripture’s integrity, substantiates its claim to be God-breathed truth, and thereby undergirds the gospel foundation that “Christ died for our sins…He was buried, and He was raised on the third day” (1 Corinthians 15:3-4). |
    |