What historical events align with the destruction mentioned in Daniel 9:26? Text of Daniel 9:26 “Then after the sixty-two weeks the Messiah will be cut off and will have nothing. The people of the prince who is to come will destroy the city and the sanctuary. The end will come like a flood; and until the end there will be war; desolations have been decreed.” Prophetic Framework: The Seventy Weeks • The angel Gabriel sets out seventy “weeks” (heptads) of years—490 prophetic years of 360 days each—beginning with a royal decree “to restore and rebuild Jerusalem” (v. 25). • Conservative scholarship identifies the starting point with Artaxerxes I’s authorization to Nehemiah in the twentieth year of his reign (Nisan, 445 BC; Nehemiah 2:1–8). • Sixty-nine weeks (483 prophetic years = 173,880 days) terminate on 10 Nisan, AD 33—exactly when Jesus of Nazareth rides into Jerusalem in the “Triumphal Entry” (Luke 19:28-44), presenting Himself as Israel’s Messiah and thereby fulfilling Zechariah 9:9. • Verse 26 describes two distinct events after (but not within) those sixty-nine weeks: (1) the Messiah is “cut off” (the crucifixion, AD 33), and (2) the city and sanctuary are destroyed (AD 70). A prophetic gap is therefore implied between the sixty-ninth and seventieth weeks. Event One: “The Messiah will be cut off” • 30–33 AD, Jesus is executed under Pontius Pilate. “Cut off” (Heb. kārath) regularly denotes capital punishment (cf. Leviticus 7:20, Psalm 37:9). • “Will have nothing” foretells the apparent loss of His royal prerogatives and the scattering of His followers (Matthew 26:56), yet paradoxically secures atonement (Isaiah 53:8, Daniel 9:24). Event Two: Destruction of the City and Sanctuary 1. Roman-Jewish War (AD 66-73) – Titus, son of Vespasian, leads the legions (V Macedonica, X Fretensis, XII Fulminata, XV Apollinaris). – Jerusalem is breached 9 Ab, AD 70; the Temple is torched the following day. Josephus, Wars 6.4.5-7, notes that 1.1 million perish. – “The people of the prince” = Roman armies; “prince who is to come” = a future ruler from that same people (cf. Daniel 7:8, 8:23; ultimately the eschatological antichrist). – “End … like a flood” depicts the overwhelming, swift ruin. Roman engineers built siege ramps, and fires raged uncontrollably—language matching Josephus’ eye-witness language of torrents of flame. – Continuous “war” and “desolations” follow: guerrilla engagements till Masada falls (AD 73). 2. Bar Kokhba Revolt (AD 132-135) – Hadrian razes the site anew, ploughs it under, erects Aelia Capitolina, bans Jews. Many see this as the closing ripple of the “flood,” with desolations protracted “until the end.” Why Not the Babylonian Sack of 586 BC? • Daniel writes after that earlier catastrophe; the prophecy speaks of a yet-future destruction following the advent and death of Messiah. • The Second Temple, not Solomon’s, is in view: “the sanctuary” that will exist after the return from exile, standing in Jesus’ day (cf. Matthew 24:1-2). Archaeological and Documentary Corroboration • Temple-Mount debris: Herodian ashlar blocks toppled by Romans still lie along the Western Wall; coin hoards beneath the destruction layer date precisely to 66-70 AD. • Arch of Titus (Rome): bas-relief shows soldiers carrying the Temple menorah and trumpets. • Judean Desert documents: Murabbaʿat papyri (AD 132-35) confirm continued desolations. • Josephus, Tacitus (Hist. 5.11–13), Suetonius (Vesp. 5), and the Talmud (b. Git. 56b) independently record the conflagration. Chronological Precision Highlights Divine Foreknowledge • Sir Robert Anderson’s astronomical work (The Coming Prince, 1894) validates the 173,880-day span from 1 Nisan 445 BC to 10 Nisan AD 33. The mathematical fit between decree, triumphal entry, and cross is unparalleled among world religions. • Ussher’s chronology, with creation at 4004 BC, dovetails: Artaxerxes’ decree at anno mundi 3559; Christ’s crucifixion at 4033; Temple destruction at 4070—harmonizing sacred history to literal years. Theological Significance • Fulfillment authenticates Jesus’ messiahship and underscores His resurrection, the capstone of salvation (1 Corinthians 15:3-4). • Verified prophecy substantiates Scripture’s divine inspiration, providing a rational basis for faith (Isaiah 48:3-5). • Desolations warn of judgment yet invite repentance; the seventieth week, still future, calls all nations to reconciliation in Christ before His return (Daniel 9:27; Revelation 19:11-16). Common Critical Objections Answered 1. Late-Date Composition (2nd-century BC). Rebuttal: Qumran texts prove Daniel pre-dates Antiochus IV; linguistic features are Imperial Aramaic, not Hasmonean. 2. Maccabean Fulfillment. Rebuttal: Antiochus desecrated but did not destroy Jerusalem or the sanctuary; moreover, the timeline misses Messiah’s appearance. 3. Multiple Messiahs Theory. Rebuttal: Scripture consistently applies “Anointed One” in this context to the singular Redeemer (Psalm 2, Isaiah 53). Conclusion The most coherent, documentable alignment of Daniel 9:26 is (1) the crucifixion of Jesus in AD 33 and (2) the Roman destruction of Jerusalem and the Second Temple in AD 70, with continuing desolations climaxing in the Bar Kokhba war. Archaeology, secular history, manuscript evidence, and precise chronology converge to affirm the prophecy’s accuracy and to magnify the sovereign Lord who declares “the end from the beginning” (Isaiah 46:10). |
    |