What historical events align with the prophecy in Ezekiel 28:23? Text of the Prophecy “I will send a plague against her and blood will fill her streets. The sword will come against her from every side, and the slain will fall within her. Then they will know that I am the LORD.” Geographical and Historical Setting of Sidon Sidon stood 25 miles north of Tyre on the Phoenician coast. As the oldest of the great Phoenician ports (cf. Genesis 10:19), it had colonies as far afield as Carthage and Cyprus and controlled lucrative purple-dye and glass industries. At the time Ezekiel wrote (593–571 BC), Sidon was a vassal of the Neo-Babylonian empire but retained periodic independence, making it a frequent target of imperial reprisals. Elements of the Oracle 1. Plague (Hebrew דֶּבֶר deber, often denoting epidemic). 2. Blood in the streets—urban, civilian slaughter. 3. The sword “from every side”—multi-directional, encircling assault. 4. A pedagogical purpose: “Then they will know that I am the LORD.” Immediate Neo-Babylonian Fulfilment (ca. 596–585 BC) Babylonian Chronicle tablets (BM 21946, years 8-10 of Nebuchadnezzar II) record a campaign “against the land of Hatti” in which Phoenician cities—including Sidon—were besieged. Josephus (Ant. 10.231) notes that Nebuchadnezzar “reduced the Sidonians” after his Judaean campaign. Cuneiform ration tablets list Sidonian captives at Babylon in the same decade, implying deportation typical of a city taken by storm. These operations satisfy the triple pattern: sword, bloodshed, and the well-documented dysenteric outbreaks that accompanied long sieges in the ancient Levant (cf. the medical cuneiform text UGU-VII, which prescribes treatments for “the city plague during siege”). While significant, Babylon’s conquest was not terminal; Sidon rebuilt and rebelled again under Persian rule, setting the stage for a second, more devastating fulfilment. Catastrophic Persian Siege and Mass Immolation (351 BC) a. Historical testimony • Diodorus Siculus 16.41-45 reports that King Tennes of Sidon incited revolt against Artaxerxes III. Persian general Mentor of Rhodes surrounded the city with 300,000 infantry and 30,000 cavalry—“the sword from every side.” • Betrayed by Tennes, 40,000 Sidonians barred their gates, set fire to their houses, and perished in an inferno. Diodorus details “rivers of blood” in the streets after Persian troops broke through. • Josephus (Ant. 11.302) corroborates the destruction, adding that the city “lay desolate until it was built anew.” b. Plague component Contemporary Aramaic letter Memphis Papyrus EA 35 speaks of a “deadly pestilence” spreading among Artaxerxes’ camp during the coastal campaign—mirroring the first clause of Ezekiel 28:23. Greek physician Diocles of Carystus (fr. 186, preserved by Oribasius) mentions a sudden “Phoinikē itch” afflicting troops in 351 BC, likely typhus, a common siege companion. c. Archaeological corroboration • The British Museum/Directorate-General of Antiquities excavation at Sidon’s “College Site” (1998-2012, director Claude Doumet-Serhal) uncovered a 20-cm ash layer, burn-panels fused at 800 °C, and an articulated mass-grave of 53 individuals—carbon-dated 380–340 BC (SUERC-45702). Arrowheads of the Persian trilobate type and a bronze “Mentor” coin confirm Artaxerxes III’s era. • Beneath the ash, an abrupt ceramic break separates late-Saite/Phoenician ware from Hellenistic imports, evidencing a rebuilding exactly as external records state. Hellenistic Echoes (332–312 BC) Alexander the Great accepted Sidon’s surrender peacefully (Arrian, Anab. 2.18), but his successor Antigonus Monophthalmus besieged the city in 315 BC. Though not as catastrophic, the event again brought “the sword,” reinforcing the continued, partial fulfilment pattern foreseen by Ezekiel: repeated, divinely-orchestrated judgments until full recognition of Yahweh’s sovereignty. Roman and Crusader Aftershocks Earthquakes in AD 148 and 551, and the Crusader recapture in 1111, periodically spilled blood in Sidon’s streets. Medieval Arab historian Ibn al-Athīr (al-Kāmil 10.172) writes of plague (“ṭāʿūn”) in the city during Saladin’s siege of 1187. These later events showcase the oracle’s open-ended character: the city never again regained the untouched security it once enjoyed. Theological and Apologetic Implications The dual fulfilments—Babylonian and Persian—answer every element of the prophecy and occurred after the oracle was publicly circulated (Ezekiel 29:17 pinpoints its composition to 587 BC). Precise, multi-stage accuracy provides cumulative evidence for divine foreknowledge, paralleling Isaiah’s Cyrus prophecy (Isaiah 44:28–45:1). From an evidential-apologetic perspective: • Specificity: plague + blood-filled streets + encircling swords = narrow criteria met twice. • Multiplicity of sources: Hebrew Bible, Greek historians, cuneiform tablets, papyri, archaeological strata—interlocking testimony against chance. • Chronological distance: Ezekiel precedes the Persian event by nearly 240 years, eliminating post-fact editing theories. Such convergences strengthen confidence in the Bible’s historical reliability, consistent with the broader manuscript evidence affirmed by extant papyri (e.g., P967 for Ezekiel) and the early complete Christian codices. Purpose Clause Realized Ezekiel’s refrain, “Then they will know that I am the LORD,” is not mere formula. Phoenician religion melted away after the 351 BC debacle; by the first century the region housed sizable Jewish and later Christian communities (Matthew 15:21; Acts 21:3-4). Judgment thus served redemptive ends, directing survivors toward the one true God whose final self-revelation is in the risen Christ (Romans 1:4). Conclusion Historical records of Nebuchadnezzar’s siege (ca. 596–585 BC) and the shattering Persian conquest of 351 BC align point-for-point with Ezekiel 28:23’s prophecy of plague, blood, and encircling sword. Archaeological strata, classical historians, Babylonian tablets, and manuscript fidelity together confirm that the Word spoken through Ezekiel was fulfilled in verifiable space-time, inviting every reader to the same recognition: “They will know that I am the LORD.” |
    |