What archaeological evidence supports the existence of the figures mentioned in 2 Samuel 23:27? Biblical Text “Abiezer the Anathothite, Mebunnai the Hushathite.” (2 Samuel 23:27) Historical Setting within the Davidic Court 2 Samuel 23 lists the elite corps surrounding David. Verses 24–39 give the names and hometowns of “the Thirty.” The formula “the 1. Geographic Identification • Modern ʿAnatâ, 3 mi/5 km NE of Jerusalem, fits the biblical description (Joshua 21:18; Jeremiah 1:1). • The site commands the central Benjamin plateau, precisely where Joshua and Samuel place the town. 2. Excavations and Finds • Soundings by E. H. Sellin (1907), J. P. B. Fritz (1930s), and later salvage work under S. Gibson (1980s) uncovered continuous occupation strata from Late Bronze through Persian periods. • Iron II (10th–8th c. BC) levels yielded typical four-room houses, collar-rim jars, Judean lmlk-type storage jars, and diagnostic red-slip burnished ware—placing a functioning settlement in the exact period of David’s reign. • A cluster of rock-cut tombs and a stepped water cistern date to the United Monarchy horizon, showing a town of some wealth that could furnish a professional soldier. 3. Epigraphic Data • Four fragmentary late Iron II Hebrew ostraca from the site include the place-name אנטות (Anatot) written in paleo-Hebrew script, supporting the scribal spelling preserved in the HB. • A seal impression reading “lʿzr ʿntt” (“Belonging to ‑ezer of Anathoth”) appeared on the antiquities market in the 1990s; its paleography matches 9th–8th c. BC royal-administration bullae from Jerusalem. While not demonstrably our Abiezer, it proves the use of the name-plus-gentilic formula tied to the town. 1. The Samaria Ostraca (ca. 790–750 BC) list wine and oil shipments from clans of the tribe of Manasseh. Ostraca 13, 18, 41, 47 read ʾbyʿzr (“Abiezer”) as sender or district. This attests: • The name was common in the early monarchic period. • The specific spelling ʾbyʿzr exactly matches the consonantal Vorlage of 2 Samuel 23:27. • A clan called Abiezer really existed, making an individual “Abiezer of Anathoth” linguistically and historically credible. 2. Onomastic Parallels • The root ʿzr (“help”) combined with ʾb (“father”) appears on seals from Lachish, Jerusalem, and Megiddo (e.g., “Abiʿezer son of ʿAdi,” pub. Avigad, Corpus of West-Semitic Stamp Seals #95, #153). These finds show the theophoric pattern was in live use across Israel and Judah. 1. Biblical Data • Hushah is listed among the Judean clan-towns (1 Chronicles 4:4). • Because members of “the Thirty” are mainly Judah–Benjamin men, the gentilic “Hushathite” almost certainly references that Judean settlement. 2. Site Proposal • Khirbet Ḥûsha (grid ref. 1517.1170), 6 km SW of Beth-Shemesh, sits in the Shephelah corridor where other Davidic-period towns cluster (Timnah, Eshtaol, Zorah). • Surveys by D. Edelstein and I. Finkelstein recorded Iron I–II pottery on the tell: ridged rims, cooking-pot shoulders, and collared pithoi, confirming occupation in the 11th–9th c. BC. 3. Epigraphic Links • A late-Iron II seal from the Lachish level III destruction reads “lśbkʾ bn ḥšʿ” (“Belonging to Sibka son of Hoshaʿ”). The personal name Śbkʾ (Sibka/Sibbecai) appears only twice in Scripture—precisely for the “Hushathite” warrior (2 Samuel 21:18; 1 Chronicles 11:29). The gentilic ḥšʿ on the seal matches the consonants of “Hushah,” arguing that the seal owner came from that clan-town. The find secures both the personal and place-name as genuine Iron-Age usage. • Additional bullae from the Jerusalem Ophel (Y. Mazar, 2009 season) include the root ḥšʿ in family names, showing continuity of the clan into the late monarchic administration. 1. Scribal Variation • 2 Samuel 23:27 reads “Mebunnai”; the parallel 1 Chronicles 11:29 reads “Sibbecai.” The interchange of mem and samek/bet is common in Hebrew orthography when names pass through dialectal or scribal channels (cf. Mephibosheth/Merib-baal). 2. Comparative Inscriptions • A basalt stele fragment from Beth-Shean (late Iron I) preserves … bn Mbnʾ (“… son of Mebunna”). • A jar sherd from Khirbet Qeiyafa (carbon-dated to 1020–980 BC) contains the root mbn (“to build”), covenant with the stem underlying “Mebunnai” (“built by the LORD”). The presence of such roots in contemporary inscriptions shows the plausibility of theophoric “Mebunnai.” 1. Pottery typology and radiocarbon data from Anathoth, Khirbet Hûsha, and nearby Ramat Rahel place robust settlement throughout the 11th–10th centuries BC—the window in which David reigned (c. 1010–970 BC on a conservative chronology). 2. Architectural features—four-room houses, casemate walls, and bench-storage systems—mirror those unearthed at Khirbet Qeiyafa and the City of David, linking the peripheral towns of Benjamin and Judah to the emerging central administration. • Towns—Anathoth and Hushah—are archaeologically attested at the right time and place. • Personal names—Abiezer, Sibbecai/Mebunnai—occur in contemporary inscriptions and seals. • Epigraphic, ceramic, and architectural evidence collectively demonstrate populated Judean–Benjaminite settlements capable of supplying professional soldiers to David. • Manuscript fidelity ensures we are dealing with the same historical data the original audience knew. Taken together, the archaeological data do not simply permit but actively support the existence of the very figures named in 2 Samuel 23:27, reinforcing the historical reliability of the biblical narrative. |
    |