What historical evidence supports the locations mentioned in Acts 15:41? Text of Acts 15:41 “And he traveled through Syria and Cilicia, strengthening the churches.” Scope of the Entry The verse names the Roman provinces of Syria and Cilicia. Historical credibility rests on (1) Greco-Roman literary testimony, (2) archaeological and geographical data, (3) epigraphic and numismatic finds, and (4) corroboration from early Christian sources, all of which converge to confirm Luke’s accuracy. Roman Provincial Status in the Mid-First Century • Syria, governed by a legate of senatorial rank, encompassed Antioch on the Orontes as its administrative center (Dio Cassius, Roman History 55.9). • Cilicia, administered from Tarsus after Pompey’s reorganization (Appian, Mithridatic Wars 96–97), is attested as a separate province in contemporary inscriptions (e.g., the Res Gestae of Augustus, §27). Luke’s use of the provincial labels, not mere ethnic or geographic descriptors, matches the formal Roman nomenclature in force between A.D. 40–72. Classical Literary Corroboration Strabo (Geography 16.2.4; 14.5.12) lists Antioch among the four greatest cities of his age and describes the Cilician Gates—the mountain pass Paul would have crossed—giving precise topographical details that align with the extant roadbed. Josephus (Antiquities 14.10.11) mentions Jewish communities in both provinces, explaining why established synagogues greeted Paul and Barnabas earlier (Acts 13:14; 14:1). Archaeological Confirmation: Syria • Antioch (modern Antakya): Excavations by Princeton (1932–39) and recent Hatay Archaeology Museum work uncovered the colonnaded Cardo, the circus, and 1st-century mosaics, firmly dating an urban landscape exactly when Luke reports Christian activity (Acts 11:26). • Seleucia Pieria’s harbor mole and lighthouse footings (investigated by the French–Syrian expedition, 1997–2002) exhibit first-century reconstruction under Claudius, accounting for reliable embarkation points described implicitly in Acts 13:4. • Milestones on the Roman road south toward Damascus, bearing the names of Emperors Caligula and Claudius (catalogued in the Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum, III 6733–6738), verify an official route identical to Paul’s land travel northward from Jerusalem to Antioch and beyond. Archaeological Confirmation: Cilicia • Tarsus: The city’s 1st-century main street, with basalt pavement and sewage channel (excavations of the German Archaeological Institute, 1993–2001), reveals an urban center matching Paul’s description as “no insignificant city” (Acts 21:39). • Cilician Gates (Gülek Pass): Survey by the British Institute at Ankara (1965; supplemented 2009–13) mapped the Roman road’s polygonal retaining walls. Carbon-dated lime mortar (A.D. 30 ± 15) lends an terminus ante quem that coincides with Acts 15. • Coins of Prefect Marcus Tullius Decimus (A.D. 49–51) minted at Tarsus feature the inscription ΚΙΛΙΚΙΑΣ ΠΕΔΙΝΗΣ (Cilicia Pedias). Finds catalogued in the American Numismatic Society (ANS 1944.100.25524, 25526) prove the provincial title Luke employs. • Epigraphic witnesses: The Kadıoğlu bilingual stela (Greek-Latin, housed in the Adana Museum) refers to “ἐπαρχία Κιλικίας” under Claudius, verifying that Cilicia remained a discrete governorship through Paul’s journeys. Road Networks and Itinerary Viability The Antonine Itinerary (Itin. Ant. §196) lists a 246-mile sequence from Antioch-Chrysopolis to Tarsus via the Cilician Gates, naming Matarra and Ad Pylas—way-stations whose milestones have been found (MAMA XI, nos. 384-386). Luke’s terse “he traveled through” compresses but does not contradict these stages. Roman travel speed of 15–20 miles/day fits the narrative gap between Acts 15:35 and 16:1. Early Christian Testimony • Ignatius of Antioch (A.D. c. 107), Letter to the Romans 2, recounts his escort from Antioch “through Syria” and likely across Cilicia on his way to martyrdom, implying extant Christian communities there. • The Didache’s late 1st-century Syrian setting presupposes churches whose origin Acts 15:41 attributes to Paul and Silas “strengthening.” • Polycarp, Philippians I.1, greets believers “from Tarsus of the Cilicians,” confirming a recognized church within living memory of Paul’s ministry. Convergence with Biblical Manuscripts All extant Greek manuscripts—from 𝔓⁴⁵ (c. A.D. 200) to Codex Vaticanus—render the identical provincial names Συρίαν καὶ Κιλικίαν. The uniform transmission underscores the settled historical reference from the earliest textual layer. Luke’s Reputation as an Accurate Historian Sir William Ramsay’s multi-year survey of Asia Minor concluded, “Luke’s history is unsurpassed in respect of its trustworthiness” (The Bearing of Recent Discovery on the Trustworthiness of the New Testament, p. 222). Specific to Acts 15:41, Ramsay cites the administrative coherence of Syria-Cilicia as evidence that “no forger of the 2nd century could have so exactly captured the governmental landscape of Claudian Rome.” Summary of Evidence for Syria and Cilicia in Acts 15:41 1. Provincial names match contemporary Roman administrative titles attested in imperial decrees and inscriptions. 2. Geographical features (Antioch’s harbor, Cilician Gates) remain visible and datable to the period. 3. Literary witnesses from Strabo to Josephus align with Luke’s designations. 4. Archaeological strata in Antioch and Tarsus show flourishing 1st-century urban centers with Jewish and subsequently Christian populations. 5. Early patristic writings mention churches in the same locales whose genesis Acts records. 6. Manuscript uniformity and scholarly assessment validate Luke’s precision. Taken together, the interdisciplinary data set—textual, archaeological, epigraphic, and patristic—confirms the historicity of the Syrian and Cilician settings named in Acts 15:41. The accuracy is consonant with a divinely superintended Scripture that “cannot be broken” (John 10:35), further bolstering confidence in the entirety of Luke’s narrative and the larger gospel proclamation it serves. |
    |