What historical evidence supports the conquest described in Deuteronomy 11:23? Deuteronomy 11:23 in the Biblical Narrative “then the LORD will drive out all these nations before you, and you will dispossess nations greater and stronger than you.” This promise anticipates the sweeping entry into Canaan recorded in Joshua 1–12. The question, therefore, is whether tangible historical data corroborate a rapid, divinely enabled Israelite advance in the late fifteenth–early fourteenth centuries BC (the approximate window yielded by a straightforward reading of 1 Kings 6:1, Judges 11:26 and Usshur’s 1406 BC date for entry). Chronological Framework • Exodus: c. 1446 BC • Wilderness Sojourn: 40 years • Jordan Crossing & Conquest: c. 1406–1390 BC Radiocarbon tests on charcoal from the Mount Ebal altar (see below) average 1400–1200 BC, comfortably within this conservative window. Archaeological Corroboration of the Conquest • Jericho (Tell es-Sultan) – John Garstang (1930s) uncovered a collapsed city wall dating to Late Bronze I. – Kathleen Kenyon (1950s) misdated the destruction to 1550 BC largely by pottery typology, but oversight of ceramic continuities and absence of Egyptian imports has been re-evaluated by Bryant G. Wood (1990). Reexamination shows LB I pottery, carbonised grain, and a burn layer consistent with a short siege and spring harvest (cf. Joshua 3:15; 5:10). Massive mud-brick tumble at the base of the stone revetment matches “the wall fell down flat” (Joshua 6:20). • Ai – While et-Tell (traditionally Ai) was unoccupied c. 1400 BC, nearby Khirbet el-Maqatir bears a fortification, gate, and pottery spanning 1500–1400 BC, destroyed by fire. Topography fits Joshua 7–8: a hill east of Bethel, a shallow valley north of the city, and a location from which a force could ambush. • Hazor (Tell el-Qedah) – Amnon Ben-Tor’s excavations reveal a massive LB I palace charred and toppled. A decapitated basalt statue of a Canaanite king, cultic idols smashed, and royal archives deliberately torched support Joshua 11:10–13. Burn layers are radiocarbon-dated c. 1400 BC. • Southern Coalition Cities (Joshua 10) – Lachish (Tel Lachish): Level VII destruction by intense conflagration in LB I; arrowheads in the gate area attest combat. – Debir (Khirbet Rabud): LB I destruction burn with domestic pottery subsequently absent until Iron I Israelite resettlement. – Eglon (Tel ‘Eton) and Hormah (Tel Masos region) show synchronous abandonments. • Mount Ebal Altar (Joshua 8:30–35) – Adam Zertal (1980s) unearthed a 9 m × 7 m stone structure with ash containing only kosher animal bones, plastered surfaces, and a surrounding enclosure. Pottery: LB II–early Iron I. The altar’s orientation, ramp (no steps: Exodus 20:26), and unhewn stones closely parallel Mosaic prescriptions. • Foot-Shaped Enclosures (Jordan Valley & hill country) – Five sandal-soles outlined in stones (Gilgal-fashion) dated Iron I house assembly areas mentioned in Joshua 4:19; 5:9. Their shape symbolises legal possession of the land (Deuteronomy 11:24 “Every place where the sole of your foot treads”). • Hill-Country Settlement Pattern – Hundreds of new agrarian sites suddenly arise in Iron I, marked by four-room houses, collar-rim jars, terracing, and virtual absence of pig bones—dietary distinctiveness predicted in Leviticus 11:7. The surge reflects a people moving en masse from tent to village life after conquest. Extra-Biblical Written Records • Amarna Letters (EA 286, 287, 289; c. 1350 BC) – Canaanite city-state rulers plead for Egyptian aid against marauding “Habiru.” The political vacuum and turf wars match Israel’s initial incursions and the book of Joshua’s description of fragmented Canaanite resistance once Egypt’s garrisoning waned after Amenhotep II. • Merneptah Stele (c. 1208 BC) – Mentions “Israel” already as a socio-ethnic group in Canaan (“Israel is laid waste, his seed is not”), verifying that by LB II Israel is firmly rooted within the land, implying an earlier entry than the 1200s. • Papyrus Anastasi I and Karnak Reliefs of Seti I (c. 1290 BC) list cities identical to Joshua’s itinerary, some in ruin, corroborating large-scale upheaval in preceding decades. Geographical Consistency Routes, city distances, and landscape cues embedded in Joshua precisely mirror modern topography—from ascent routes at the Wadi Farah (Joshua 3) to valley‐floor geometry around Gibeon (Joshua 10). No anachronistic placings appear, implying eyewitness origin. Anthropological Signatures Stone-lined silos, collar-rim pithoi, and lime-plastered cisterns surface abruptly in LB–Iron I transitional levels at sites credited to early Israel. They betray a cultural discontinuity rather than slow evolution, fitting a conquering-cum-settling population. Miraculous Elements and Divine Agency Archaeology cannot test the supernatural per se, yet Jericho’s sudden falling walls, short siege grain stores, and absence of scaling warfare apparatus provide circumstantial pointers to a collapse not orchestrated by conventional assault—consistent with the biblical claim of Yahweh’s intervention. Cumulative Case and Common Objections 1. “Kenyon disproved the conquest.” Her pottery‐based redating disregarded overlooked LB I bichrome ware still in situ. 2. “No evidence for Ai.” Khirbet el-Maqatir data published 1995–2019 answer the occupancy gap. 3. “City lists are exaggerated.” Excavated destruction patterns closely track Joshua’s sequencing—Jericho, then Ai/Bethel, southern confederacy, Hazor foremost in the north. Implications The promise of Deuteronomy 11:23 intertwines with physical markers still visible in the land. When pottery shards, burn layers, and boundary monuments align with Scripture’s internal chronology and narrative flow, the rational conclusion is coherence, not coincidence. The historical conquest thus grounds the reliability of Moses’ words, foreshadowing the greater conquest over death secured by the resurrected Christ. |
    |