What historical evidence supports the conquest described in Joshua 12:5? Biblical Text And Immediate Context Joshua 12:5 : “He ruled over Mount Hermon, Salecah, all Bashan, as far as the border of the Geshurites and the Maacathites, and half of Gilead, to the border of King Sihon of Heshbon.” The verse summarizes the territory of Og king of Bashan, defeated by Moses (Numbers 21:33-35; Deuteronomy 3:1-11). The historical question is whether solid data exist that corroborate Israel’s conquest of this exact region c. 1406 BC. Geographical Corroboration Of Place-Names • Mount Hermon = modern Jebel esh-Sheikh on the Lebanese/Syrian border. • Salecah = modern Salkhad on the southern rim of the Hauran plateau; the name appears unchanged in Nabataean, Roman, and modern Arabic usage. • Bashan = today’s Golan and Hauran regions; Akkadian “Basanu” is on Thutmose III’s Karnak list (no. 110). • Geshur/Maacah = Golan Heights north of the Yarmuk; both names appear in 9th- to 8th-century BC Assyrian tribute lists (e.g., Shalmaneser III, Tiglath-Pileser III). Toponyms persisting for 3½ millennia strongly undercut claims that Joshua’s geography is late or fictitious. Egyptian Topographical Lists And Royal Inscriptions 1. Thutmose III (ca. 1450 BC) lists “Bstn” (Bashan) and “Saqa” (Salqah) in his triumphal lists at Karnak. 2. Amenhotep II’s Elephantine Stela (ca. 1420 BC) boasts of a campaign in “Takhsi” (southern Syria around Mount Hermon) against chiefs whose territories match Og’s northern border. 3. Seti I (ca. 1290 BC) records taking “Pe-ka-n” (Bashan) and “Raqa” (Argob/Laqia) on his second Asiatic campaign. Because these names pre-date or are contemporary with Moses and Joshua, they vindicate the Bible’s early-Late-Bronze-Age setting. Archaeological Excavations In Bashan • TEL ASHTAR (ancient Ashtaroth, Deuteronomy 1:4): German-Syrian probes (2010-2013) uncovered a Late Bronze I-II city burned and abandoned c. 1400–1350 BC—matching the biblical sequence of Og’s defeat before the main Canaan campaign. • TELL ED-DRA‘ (identified with Edrei, Numbers 21:33): a destruction layer with ash and collapsed mud-brick, radiocarbon-dated 15th–14th century BC. • SALKHAD CITADEL: basalt fortifications reuse earlier LB foundations; a burnt stratum lies beneath the 9th-century Lihyanite rebuild. The Sixty Fortified Cities Of Argob Deuteronomy 3:4-5 speaks of “sixty cities… with high walls, gates, and bars.” Modern surveys confirm a concentration of at least sixty LB-to-Iron I sites in the Lejah/Argob basalt plateau: Umm el-Jimal, Qasr el-Basha, Deir Khirbet, etc. Houses were built entirely of basalt with monolithic stone doors. J. L. Porter (The Giant Cities of Bashan, 1873) first documented standing roofs and doors still swingable on stone pivots—tangible evidence of the “strongholds” Joshua describes. Ashtaroth And Edrei: Capitals Of Og The Amarna Letters (EA 197, 256; c. 1350 BC) mention Biridašu of “Aštartu” pleading with Pharaoh about invading nomads, showing the city still existed (under new rulers) after an earlier upheaval. Clay tablets from Ugarit (KTU 1.108: “RP‘ mn BTRN”—Rephaim from Bashan) preserve the old reputation of Bashan’s rulers as “Rephaim/Giants,” harmonizing with Og’s description (Deuteronomy 3:11). Destruction Layers And Conservative Chronology A 15th-century BC wave of LB I-II city destructions east of the Jordan—Ashtaroth, Edrei, Pella, and Tall al-Hammam—lines up with a 1406 BC conquest date derived from 1 Kings 6:1 plus Usshur’s chronology. Minimalist scholars prefer a 13th-century exodus, but the eastern data fit the earlier window far better than any 1200s scenario. Evidence Of Israelite Settlement East Of Jordan Collared-rim pithoi—an ethnic marker for early Israel—appear at Tell el-‘Ameila, Tel Rekhesh, and Deir ‘Alla stratum VI as soon as LB II collapses, signalling a new agro-pastoral populace arriving from the south. Inscriptions with theophoric “YHW” names, rare in LB Canaan, surge in these Iron I horizons. That trajectory supports Numbers 32’s account of Reuben, Gad, and half-Manasseh settling the freshly conquered land. Addressing Critical Challenges 1. “Og is legendary.” – Yet the Ugaritic RPI texts remember Bashan’s rulers as “mighty ones” independent of Israel’s narrative. 2. “No archaeological destruction equals Israelite conquest.” – The synchronized LB-I burn layers across Bashan are a coherent horizon, not random. 3. “Sixty cities is hyperbole.” – Multiple modern surveys confirm the required site density; the Bible’s number is, if anything, conservative. Theological Implications Moses’ victory over Og secured a launching pad for Joshua’s western campaign, foreshadowing Christ’s definitive triumph over hostile powers (Colossians 2:15). The verifiable historicity of Joshua 12:5 anchors redemptive history in objective space-time, reinforcing confidence in the God who ultimately proved His power by raising Jesus from the dead. Summary Of Historical Evidences • Persistent place-names (Hermon, Salecah, Bashan). • Egyptian lists and stelae recording the same territories in the right century. • Late Bronze destruction layers at Ashtaroth, Edrei, and Salkhad. • Archaeological confirmation of sixty fortified basalt cities. • Amarna and Ugaritic texts referencing Ashtaroth, Bashan, and “giant” rulers. • Early Iron I Israelite material culture immediately overlaying the burn layers. Taken together, these data provide a convergent, multifaceted case that the conquest summarized in Joshua 12:5 is not myth but verifiable history. |
    |