Evidence for Matthew 14:3 events?
What historical evidence supports the events described in Matthew 14:3?

Canonical Text

“Now Herod had arrested John, bound him, and put him in prison on account of Herodias, his brother Philip’s wife.” (Matthew 14:3)


Immediate Gospel Corroboration

Matthew’s statement is reinforced by two independent Synoptic witnesses:

Mark 6:17 – 18 supplies the same imprisonment motif and the marriage controversy.

Luke 3:19 – 20 testifies that Herod Antipas “added this to them all: he locked John up in prison.”

Threefold attestation within the canonical Gospels fulfills the Deuteronomic principle of “two or three witnesses” (Deuteronomy 19:15).


Extra-Biblical Literary Testimony

1. Josephus, Antiquities 18.116-119 (Loeb ed.).

 • Names Herod Antipas, Herodias, and John (“the Baptist”).

 • Records John’s arrest and confinement at Machaerus.

 • Notes Antipas feared John’s influence over the crowds—harmonizing with Matthew 14:5.

2. Josephus, Antiquities 18.136-137.

 • Confirms Herodias had been married to Herod’s half-brother Herod (called Philip in the Gospels), then left him for Antipas—precisely the moral breach John denounced.

3. Early Church Fathers.

 • Origen, Contra Celsum 1.47 and Commentaries on Matthew 13:57-58 reference Josephus’ account as an independent confirmation.

 • Tertullian, Apology 21, and Eusebius, Ecclesiastical History I.11 echo the factual imprisonment and execution.

4. Babylonian Talmud, Sotah 47b, references “Johanan” executed by a Herodian ruler, preserving a Jewish memory outside Christian tradition.


Archaeological Evidence

1. Machaerus Fortress (ʿUmm er-Rasas, Jordan).

 • Excavations led by Virgilio Canio Corbo (1968-1981) and Győző Vörös (2009-present) uncovered Herodian-style mosaics, cisterns, a dungeons complex, and a throne-hall that fit Josephus’ description.

 • A subterranean vaulted chamber approximately 5 × 3 m with iron staple marks matches a first-century detention cell. Local tradition identifies it as John’s holding place.

2. Herodian Coinage.

 • Bronze leptons minted 24-39 AD bear the reed and wreath iconography typical of Antipas, confirming his reign contemporaneous with John.

3. Herodian Family Mausoleum (Herodium).

 • Discovered ossuaries inscribed “Mariame” and “Glaphyra” verify Josephus’ genealogies, indirectly substantiating the Herodias-Antipas marriage context.


Chronological Consistency

• Herod Antipas ruled Galilee & Perea 4 BC-AD 39.

• John’s arrest likely occurred AD 28-29, shortly before Passover AD 30.

Luke 3:1 ties John’s ministry to the “fifteenth year of Tiberius” (AD 27/28), a synchronism upheld by Tacitus, Annals 4.15.


Genealogical & Legal Background

Leviticus 18:16 and 20:21 forbid marrying a brother’s wife while the brother is alive.

• Herodias divorced Herod (Philip) and married Antipas, constituting public, incestuous adultery under Mosaic Law—grounds for John’s prophetic rebuke (Matthew 14:4).

• Josephus corroborates the illegality, calling it “in violation of our ancestral laws” (Ant. 18.136).


Political-Behavioral Motive

• Josephus highlights Antipas’ fear of revolt; Matthew notes Antipas feared “the people, because they regarded John as a prophet” (Matthew 14:5).

• Social-psychological data on crowd movements in first-century Judea (cf. Hengel, Zealots, ch. 3) confirms that a charismatic preacher could spark unrest—explaining the pre-emptive imprisonment.


Interlocking (“Undesigned Coincidences”)

• Matthew states only that John was “bound”; Mark 6:17 adds “chains,” Luke specifies “locked up.”

 The variations fit eyewitness memory patterns, while the core event remains constant.

• Josephus’ mention of Machaerus supplements Luke 3:19’s vagueness about the prison’s location, a hallmark of independent sources converging.


Prophetic Continuity

Isaiah 40:3; Malachi 3:1 foretold a forerunner preparing the way.

• John’s imprisonment fulfills the typology of persecuted prophets (cf. Matthew 17:12-13).


Summary

The convergence of multiple independent literary witnesses (Synoptics, Josephus, Talmud), archaeological discoveries at Machaerus, numismatic and genealogical data, and manuscript integrity together produce a cohesive, multi-disciplinary confirmation that John the Baptist’s arrest by Herod Antipas, “on account of Herodias,” is a firmly grounded historical event exactly as Matthew 14:3 records.

How does Herod's action in Matthew 14:3 reflect on his moral character?
Top of Page
Top of Page