What historical evidence supports the resurrection account in Matthew 28:17? Early Manuscript Attestation • 𝔓64+67 (Magdalen/Barcelona papyri, c. A.D. 125–150) preserves Matthew 26 but demonstrates the gospel’s circulation well inside living-memory. • Codex Vaticanus (B, 4th c.) and Codex Sinaiticus (ℵ, 4th c.) transmit Matthew 28 verbatim, showing textual stability. • Family 1 (f¹) minuscules, dating 12th c. but stemming from an independent early archetype, carry the same wording. The unanimous wording across these lines, with no significant variant for 28:17, rules out legendary accretion. Multiple Independent Resurrection Sources 1. Matthew 28 (Jewish-Christian audience) 2. Mark 16 (short ending attests empty tomb; longer ending attests appearances) 3. Luke 24 (appearance to two on the road; Jerusalem focus) 4. John 20-21 (multiple, tactile meetings) 5. 1 Corinthians 15:3-7 (pre-Pauline creed, ≤5 years after Easter) 6. Acts 2; 3; 10 (sermons in Jerusalem & Caesarea) Each source is literarily independent or semi-independent; the convergence yields a historical “multiple-attestation” argument. Early Dating and Eyewitness Proximity • Matthew written before the fall of Jerusalem (A.D. 70) given its Temple-centric language (24:1-2) and absence of the fulfilled destruction. • 1 Corinthians 15:3-7 creed originated in Jerusalem; linguistic markers (“received,” “delivered”) denote formal transmission, placing it no later than A.D. 35. Thus, 28:17 represents testimony still challengeable by contemporaries—yet unrefuted. Criteria of Embarrassment and Psychological Realism Matthew admits “some doubted,” counter-productive if inventing propaganda. Ancient hagiography suppresses weakness; the candid inclusion signals authentic memory. The dual reaction—worship mingled with hesitation—is exactly what cognitive psychologists observe when persons meet an event that overturns prior categories. Jewish Polemic and Roman Records • Matthew 28:11-15 records the Sanhedrin’s bribery of soldiers to spread a “stolen body” story—an enemy admission that the tomb was empty. • The Toledot Yeshu (medieval redaction of earlier oral tradition) also presupposes an empty tomb, continuing the theft charge. • Tacitus, Annals 15.44 (c. A.D. 115) and Josephus, Antiquities 18.3.3 confirm that Jesus was executed under Pontius Pilate. A resurrection claim therefore had to confront an indisputable death. • Pliny the Younger, Letters 10.96 (c. A.D. 112) describes Christians worshiping Christ “as a god,” matching Matthew’s “they worshiped Him.” Archaeological Corroborations • The 1968 Giv‘at ha-Mivtar find of Yohanan’s heel-bone with crucifixion nail verifies a first-century Judean practice of Roman crucifixion using nails through the calcanei—mirrors Gospel detail (John 20:25). • First-century rolling-stone tombs outside Jerusalem (e.g., the tombs at the Church of the Holy Sepulchre complex) show the feasibility of a large stone “rolled away” (Matthew 28:2). • The Nazareth Inscription (Greek imperial edict against tomb-violation, c. A.D. 40–50) likely reflects an imperial response to reports of a body “stolen by disciples,” echoing the very rumor Matthew records. • Ossuaries bearing names “Joseph,” “Jesus,” “Mary,” etc., confirm onomastic frequency, lending verisimilitude to Gospel personae. Early Creedal Witness and Corporate Encounters 1 Cor 15 lists three group sightings (the Twelve, 500, “all the apostles”). Group perception rules out subjective hallucination, which is by nature individual and non-transferable. Transformation of the Disciples Historical sequence: hiding (John 20:19) ➜ public preaching within weeks (Acts 2) ➜ martyrdoms (James son of Zebedee—Acts 12; Peter & Paul attested by 1 Clem 5). A purely internal “vision” cannot reverse entrenched expectations of a failed Messiah and overcome fear of execution. Explosion of the Jerusalem Church and Sunday Worship Acts records 3,000 converts in Jerusalem days after the crucifixion. The movement’s epicenter sat yards from the tomb; hostile authorities could quash it by producing the body. Weekly Sunday gatherings (1 Corinthians 16:2; Revelation 1:10) emerge immediately, replacing the millennia-old Sabbath—behaviorally inexplicable absent a pivotal Sunday event. Psychological Impossibility of Collective Hallucination • Hallucinations are typically idiosyncratic, rare in groups, and do not involve empty physical referents. • Disciples handled, heard, and ate with Jesus (Luke 24:39-43; John 21:12-13). Multimodal sensory data contradicts non-corporeal states. Imperial and Local Reaction The Sanhedrin’s arrest of apostles (Acts 5) and the later persecutions under Nero imply governing alarm at a message centered on resurrection, not mere ethical teaching. An ongoing claim that a crucified Jew conquered death threatened both Roman authority and Sadducean denial of resurrection. Shroud of Turin (Probative but Non-Conclusive) Spectroscopic and pollen studies (e.g., Fanti & Di Lazzaro 2015) locate the linen’s botanical origins in the Near East and demonstrate a 3-D encoded image consistent with crucifixion wounds in wrists and feet. While not incontrovertible, it offers physical testimony consonant with Gospel passion narratives. Coherence with Hebrew Prophecy Psalm 16:10 (LXX) foretells a Holy One who “will not see decay”; Isaiah 53:11 predicts the Suffering Servant will “see the light of life.” The resurrection event supplies the only historical candidate fulfilling both. Canonical Harmony Matthew’s admission of doubt, Luke’s stress on physicality, and John’s record of Thomas’s skepticism form a tight, interlocking puzzle—a “undesigned coincidence” (Blunt 1847) evidencing authentic reminiscence rather than collusion. Philosophical Necessity If a transcendent God exists and has acted in creation (Romans 1:20), then miracle is not metaphysically impossible. The resurrection, uniquely predicted by Jesus (Mark 8:31) and confirmed in history, functions as God’s vindication of His Son (Romans 1:4). Conclusion: Cumulative Case No single artifact “proves” the resurrection; rather, multiple converging lines—early, independent texts; enemy testimony; archaeological finds; psychological data; prophetic fulfillment; transformed witnesses; and the birth of the Church—create a historically robust, rationally compelling foundation for trusting Matthew 28:17 as factual. The empty tomb is certain, the appearances are multiply attested, and the worship—and doubt—of the eyewitnesses ring with unembellished authenticity. Therefore, the resurrection account stands on solid historical ground, inviting every reader to move from doubt to worship alongside those first disciples. |
    |