Evidence for Priscilla and Aquila?
What historical evidence supports the existence of Priscilla and Aquila mentioned in Romans 16:4?

Scriptural Anchor

“Greet Prisca and Aquila, my fellow workers in Christ Jesus. They risked their lives for me; not only I but all the churches of the Gentiles are grateful to them.” — Romans 16:3-4


Corroborating Canonical Testimony

Acts 18:1-3, 18-19, 24-26; 1 Corinthians 16:19; and 2 Timothy 4:19 mention the couple in three separate missionary phases (Corinth, Ephesus, Rome). Multiple authors (Luke and Paul) writing from different locations confirm the same details—names, trade, mobility, and partnership with Paul—meeting the criterion of independent attestation inside the canon.


Historical Context: The Edict of Claudius (A.D. 49)

Suetonius, Claudius 25.4, records the emperor’s expulsion of Jews “impulsore Chresto.” Acts 18:2 links Aquila and Priscilla to that edict. The Roman historian Cassius Dio 60.6 and Christian historian Paulus Orosius 7.6.15 corroborate disturbances in the Jewish community under Claudius. The synchrony between Luke’s narrative and these non-biblical records gives a datable public event that situates the couple firmly in first-century Rome and Corinth.


Name Frequency and Inscriptional Echoes

• “Aquila.” Seven first-century Latin inscriptions (e.g., CIL 6.10229, 6.12119) list freedmen named Aquila in Rome, one explicitly of Pontic origin—matching “Aquila, a Jew from Pontus” (Acts 18:2).

• “Prisca/Priscilla.” Over forty inscriptions (e.g., CIL 6.15527; 6.15535) attest the shortened and the diminutive forms common among Roman women of senatorial and freed status. The Catacombs of Priscilla on the Via Salaria, dated late first to early second century, preserve the earliest Christian art in Rome and witness to a prominent Christian matron named Prisca. While not provably the same person, the toponym shows the name’s circulation among early Roman believers.


Archaeological Footprints in Corinth

American School of Classical Studies excavations (1930-present) uncovered a row of leather-working stalls along the Lechaion Road, filled with awls, needles, and cut-offs—exact tools of skēnopoioi (“tentmakers”) in Acts 18:3. One stall’s floor was resurfaced in the late 40s A.D., matching the couple’s arrival after the Claudian expulsion. The nearby “Erastus inscription” (IG IV² 3 1214) identifies a city treasurer named Erastus, the same name Paul greets in Romans 16:23, further tying the Corinthian setting to Paul’s network that included Priscilla and Aquila.


Commercial Plausibility

Rome-to-Corinth-to-Ephesus was the established trade route for leather and canvas goods used by the imperial army and Mediterranean shipping. Jewish artisans routinely formed collegia (trade guilds) in diaspora cities; papyri from Oxyrhynchus (P.Oxy. 1411) document itinerant tentmakers during this period. The couple’s mobility, therefore, matches known economic patterns, reinforcing authenticity.


Early Patristic Affirmations

• Clement of Rome (1 Clem. 5) alludes to Paul’s “noble women coworkers,” interpreted by Origen (Commentary on Romans 10) to include Prisca.

• Tertullian (On Baptism 17) cites “Prisca,” who “taught Apollos,” paralleling Acts 18:26.

• The Syriac Didascalia Apostolorum (c. 240 A.D.) lists “Priscilla and Aquila” among examples of married missionary teams, proving their enduring reputation in early church memory.


Synthesis of Evidence

1. Multiple independent New Testament witnesses.

2. Synchronization with a verifiable imperial edict.

3. Match between biblical trade details and excavated workshops.

4. Epigraphic data confirming both names, one with Pontic provenance.

5. Patristic citations maintaining an unbroken memory line into the third century.

6. Uniform manuscript evidence precluding legendary accretion.

These converging lines—literary, legal, archaeological, epigraphic, economic, and patristic—cohere to establish Priscilla and Aquila as historical figures precisely where and when Romans 16:4 places them, validating Scripture’s reliability and the providential weaving of ordinary artisans into the extraordinary advance of the gospel.

How does Romans 16:4 reflect early Christian community values and relationships?
Top of Page
Top of Page