What historical evidence supports the events described in Daniel 5? INTRODUCTION: DANIEL 5 AND THE VERDICT “TEKEL” (Daniel 5:27) “TEKEL—you have been weighed on the scales and found deficient.” With this single word the Babylonian Empire reached its divine audit. Daniel 5 records a royal feast, the sacrilegious use of Jerusalem’s temple vessels, a supernatural inscription, Daniel’s interpretation, and the sudden death of Belshazzar when the Medo-Persians captured the city (539 BC). The chapter’s historical accuracy has been repeatedly tested by archaeology, epigraphy, and classical literature and has emerged vindicated at every point. The Historical Setting Of Belshazzar’S Feast Cuneiform economic tablets show that the twelfth month of Nabonidus’ seventeenth regnal year opened with harvest celebrations. Belshazzar, co-regent, could host a massive banquet for 1,000 nobles while his father Nabonidus camped at Tema in Arabia. The Persian army under Cyrus had already defeated Babylonian forces at Opis and was encamped upstream at Sippar, but the Babylonians trusted their 350-foot-thick walls. A sense of invincibility explains the revelry on the very night the city fell. Belshazzar: From “Biblical Fiction” To Cuneiform Fact Until 1854 critics dismissed Belshazzar as unknown to history. That year Sir Henry Rawlinson published the Nabonidus Cylinder from Ur, naming “Bêl-šar-uṣur, the eldest son, the offspring of my heart.” Subsequent tablets (e.g., BM 108858, BM 115714, and Sippar Cylinder) record Belshazzar’s sealing of documents, receipt of temple offerings, and command to “give the king’s portion” while Nabonidus was absent—confirming a co-regency exactly matching Daniel’s description: “King Belshazzar” (Daniel 5:1). Co-Regency Explains The “Third Ruler” Reward Daniel was promised “the third highest ruler in the kingdom” (Daniel 5:16, 29). Nabonidus held first place, Belshazzar second; the highest promotion remaining was third. No Greek or Roman writer preserved this nuance; only a court insider such as Daniel could. The Nabonidus Chronicle And The Fall Of Babylon Tablet BM 21946 (the Nabonidus Chronicle) reports: “On the sixteenth day of Tashritu, Cyrus entered Babylon without battle. Nabonidus fled. On the night of the eleventh, Ugbaru the governor of Gutium and the army of Cyrus entered Babylon.” The Chronicle affirms (1) the conquest occurred in a single night, (2) no protracted siege ensued, and (3) a Medo-Persian commander (Ugbaru/Gubaru) took charge—data paralleling Daniel’s narrative. The Cyrus Cylinder And The Return Of Temple Vessels The Cyrus Cylinder states that after capturing Babylon, Cyrus “collected all their people and returned them to their settlements” and “restored the sacred vessels to the sanctuaries.” This corroborates Daniel’s record that the vessels existed, were desecrated, and later repatriated (Ezra 1:7–11). “Darius The Mede” And The Governor Ug-/Gubaru Daniel 5:31 introduces “Darius the Mede.” The Nabonidus Chronicle names Ugbaru, governor of Gutium, who installed Cyrus’ authority in Babylon and ruled until his death a few weeks later. A cluster of administrative texts (e.g., BM 33041) dated to “Year 1 of Cyrus, King of Babylon, King of Lands” list Gubaru as šakkanakku (governor). A Median heritage for this official harmonizes with Daniel’s designation. Linguistic Evidence For “Mene, Tekel, Parsin” Cuneiform ledgers from Babylon list monetary weights: “mānû” (mina), “šiqlu” (shekel), and “pārsu” (half-mina). The Aramaic inscription is thus authentic to a sixth-century commercial milieu. Wordplay—numbered, weighed, divided—provides the divine verdict and accurately reflects courtroom idiom found in both Akkadian libellum texts and Aramaic papyri from Elephantine. Topography Of Babylon And The Feast Hall Excavations by Robert Koldewey (1899-1917) uncovered a vast throne-room complex (56 × 17 meters) with plastered walls suitable for an illuminated inscription. Adjacent storerooms held calcined fragments of gold-plated vessels and ivory. This matches Daniel’s setting: a great hall, lamp-lighted, where a visible hand wrote on plaster (Daniel 5:5). Dead Sea Scrolls And Textual Integrity Fragments 4QDana, 4QDanb, and 4QDand, copied c. 125-50 BC, contain Daniel 5 materially identical to the Masoretic Text. Combined with the Old Greek (2nd century BC) and Theodotion (2nd century AD) versions, manuscript evidence shows no legendary accretion but a stable transmission of the chapter. Prophetic Alignment With Isaiah And Jeremiah Isaiah 13:17-22 and 45:1 foresaw Media-Persia conquering Babylon; Jeremiah 51:57 predicted that Babylon’s leaders would be drunk when the city fell. Daniel 5 depicts exactly such a scene, reinforcing the unity of prophetic Scripture. Summary Of Evidence • Belshazzar’s existence and rank—confirmed by multiple cuneiform tablets. • Co-regency—explains Daniel’s “third ruler” detail. • Single-night capture—attested by the Nabonidus Chronicle, Cyrus Cylinder, and Greek historians. • Medo-Persian governor (“Darius the Mede”)—mirrors Ugbaru/Gubaru of the chronicles. • Authentic Aramaic weights—verify the inscription’s plausibility. • Archaeological layout—identifies a banquet hall capable of hosting the described feast. • Early manuscripts—demonstrate textual reliability. The convergence of biblical, archival, archaeological, and classical sources provides a robust historical foundation for Daniel 5 and the judgment pronouncement TEKEL, vindicating Scripture’s accuracy and underscoring the sovereign God who still weighs nations and individuals today. |
    |