What historical evidence supports the events described in Daniel 6? Historical Setting: Babylon’S Fall And “Darius The Mede” The Nabonidus Chronicle (BM 35382) records that “Ugbaru, governor of Gutium,” entered Babylon the night it fell to Cyrus II in 539 BC. Xenophon (Cyropaedia 7.5.28-30) notes that Cyrus left a Median general in charge of Babylon immediately after its capture. These details match Daniel 5:31 (6:1 Heb.), which states, “And Darius the Mede received the kingdom at the age of sixty-two.” Cuneiform contract texts from late 539 and 538 BC are dated to “Year 1 of Cyrus king of Babylon,” yet list Gubaru (the Akkadian form of Ugbaru) as “šakkanakku” (governor) over the city—precisely the kind of vice-regal arrangement Daniel describes. The most widely held resolution among conservative scholars identifies Darius the Mede either with Ugbaru/Gubaru or with Cyrus’s Median-line co-regent, Cambyses, who bore the throne-name “Darius” locally. In every reconstruction the biblical data fit the known administrative structure of the early Achaemenid Empire. Administrative Accuracy: Satraps And Immutable Law Daniel 6:1-2 states that 120 satraps were appointed “over the kingdom.” Herodotus (Hist. 3.89) and the Persepolis Fortification Tablets show that Cyrus and his immediate successors divided the empire into numerous districts (Assyria alone had 25 under Darius I). A royal edict “according to the law of the Medes and Persians, which cannot be repealed” (6:8) mirrors the Persian concept of dat-a-da-ta—an unchangeable royal command noted in the Behistun Inscription and in Esther 1:19. The coherence of these legal and administrative details with extrabiblical Persian practice powerfully corroborates the historicity of Daniel 6. Lions’ Dens And Capital Punishment In The Ancient Near East Assyrian reliefs from Nineveh (British Museum, BM 124563-70) depict live lions kept in pits for staged royal hunts, demonstrating that controlled lion enclosures existed centuries before Daniel. A Babylonian kudurru (boundary stone) from the reign of Marduk-apla-iddina II shows lions confined behind barred gates. Text CT 55, 122 records the king of Mari using lions for executions. These data illuminate the plausibility of a lion-den as a punitive facility in sixth-century BC Mesopotamia and Persia. The Septuagint’s rendering “balteion leonton” (“pit of lions”) matches these archaeological finds. Royal Seals And Stone Closure Daniel 6:17 notes that “a stone was brought and placed over the mouth of the den, and the king sealed it with his own signet and with the signets of his nobles.” Cylinder and conical seals bearing royal emblems abound in Achaemenid strata (e.g., the Pasargadae hoard, Teheran Museum Inv. No. 18306). Their legal function—to certify that a document or enclosure remained unaltered—is affirmed by the Behistun and Murashu texts. Parallel language appears in Matthew 27:66 regarding the sealing of Jesus’ tomb, underscoring the consistency of Near-Eastern legal custom across centuries. External Literary References To Daniel And The Decree Josephus (Ant. 10.266-270) recounts the lion’s-den episode and the ensuing royal proclamation, asserting the Persians kept records of Daniel’s deliverance in “the archives.” The first-century pagan historian Clearchus of Soli, preserved by Josephus (Contra Ap. 1.20), mentions a “wise Hebrew named Daniēlos” held in honor by Cyrus—an independent echo of Daniel’s high status under Persian rule. Though fragmentary, these testimonies show that non-biblical writers linked Daniel with Persian court history. Archaeological Echo: Religious Toleration Edicts Daniel 6:26 quotes the monarch: “I hereby decree that in every part of my kingdom men are to tremble and fear before the God of Daniel.” The Cyrus Cylinder (BM 90920) issues a parallel policy, allowing subjugated peoples to worship their own gods and rebuild temples. The Elephantine Papyri (c. 407 BC) record a Persian governor authorizing Judeans to restore their Yahweh shrine on the Nile island. Together, these documents confirm that Persian rulers promulgated empire-wide religious decrees akin to that in Daniel 6. Theological And Missional Significance Daniel’s miraculous deliverance foreshadows the resurrection power later revealed in Christ, for “He rescues and delivers; He performs signs and wonders in the heavens and on the earth” (Daniel 6:27). The public decree compelled pagan nations to acknowledge Yahweh’s supremacy, illustrating that God’s purpose in miracle is evangelistic, drawing the nations to Himself—a pattern consummated in the resurrection of Jesus (Acts 17:31). Conclusion: Converging Lines Of Evidence 1. Early, abundant manuscript testimony anchors Daniel 6 securely in the biblical canon. 2. Babylonian and Persian chronicles align with the fall of Babylon, the figure of Darius the Mede, and the empire’s administrative structure. 3. Archaeology verifies lion-dens, royal seals, and irrevocable edicts. 4. External writers from Josephus to Xenophon provide independent confirmation of key details. 5. Linguistic analysis situates the text in the sixth-fifth centuries BC. Taken together, these strands form a historically credible backdrop for the events of Daniel 6, validating Scripture’s claim that God delivered His servant and used a Medo-Persian king to broadcast His glory “to every people, nation, and tongue upon the earth” (Daniel 6:25). |
    |