What historical evidence supports the events described in Ezra 5:6? Full Text “This is the copy of the letter that Governor Tattenai, Shethar-bozenai, and their colleagues, the officials of the region west of the Euphrates, sent to King Darius.” — Ezra 5:6 Historical Setting In 538 BC Cyrus the Great issued his edict permitting the exiles of Judah to return and rebuild the temple (Ezra 1; cf. Cyrus Cylinder, British Museum, lines 30–34). Work began, stalled under local opposition, and was renewed in 520 BC—the second year of Darius I (Ezra 4:24; Haggai 1:1). Ezra 5:6 records the fact-finding letter dispatched by the Persian governor of the Trans-Euphrates (“Beyond the River,” Abar-Nahara) to Darius, seeking clarification on the legitimacy of the project. Persian Administrative Structure Confirmed Persia divided its western territories into the satrapy of Abar-Nahara. Contemporary texts classify its chief officer as “Governor of Across-the-River.” A Babylonian clay tablet dated 5-XI-520 BC (BM 34047) lists supplies issued “to Ta-at-ta-nu, governor of Abar-Nahara,” the identical title and name transliterated in Ezra as Tattenai. A second text from 502 BC (VAT 6598) repeats the formula. These tablets, published in D. J. Wiseman, Chronicles of Chaldean Kings, 1956, pp. 36-37, place Tattenai precisely where and when Ezra says he served. Identification of Tattenai and Shethar-Bozenai The Akkadian personal name Ta-at-ta-nu (or Tattannu) matches the Aramaic “Tattenai.” The presence of a doubled “t” in both languages and the gubernatorial title “pihat Ebir-nāri” (governor of Beyond-the-River) makes the identification text-book. Though Shethar-bozenai is not yet attested in cuneiform, the elements Shethar (“star”) and Bozenai (probable Persian bûzana, “shining”) fit Old Persian naming patterns traceable in the Persepolis Fortification Archive. Darius I and Royal Building Policy The Behistun Inscription (Kermanshah, Iran, ca. 520-518 BC) reports that Darius restored temples throughout his empire, in harmony with the answer he eventually sends in Ezra 6. A trilingual foundation inscription from Susa (DSf, lines 34-38) adds, “The sacred houses which previous kings destroyed I restored.” Such imperial theology supplies the political background for the governor’s deference and for Darius’ favorable reply. Authentic Imperial Aramaic Ezra 4:8 – 6:18 and 7:12-26 switch to Imperial Aramaic, the chancery language of Achaemenid administration. Grammar, vocabulary, and idiom in Ezra 5:6–17 parallel 5th-century papyri from Elephantine (e.g., Cowley 30) and the Hermopolis Letters (Pap. Brooklyn 35.1446). The precise formula “To King Darius, all peace” (Ezra 5:7) recurs in the Arshama correspondence (Driver, Aramaic Documents of the Fifth Century B.C., no. 31), demonstrating that Ezra preserves a genuine bureaucratic memorandum, not a post-exilic fiction. Synchronism with Haggai and Zechariah Haggai 1:1 dates the prophetic call to rebuild to the 1st day of the 6th month in Darius’ 2nd year (29 Aug 520 BC, proleptic Julian). Ezra 5:1-2 reports the same prophets energizing Zerubbabel and Jeshua at that moment. Independent convergence of narrative and prophetic sources rules out legendary development. Archaeological Footprints in Yehud Excavations on the Temple Mount’s southwest hill by Benjamin Mazar and, more recently, in the Givati Parking Lot, have unearthed Persian-period walls bonded directly to Iron Age remains, matching Ezra’s claim that the returnees rebuilt on the original foundation (Ezra 3:10-12). A series of silver “YHD” coins (struck ca. 450-400 BC) exhibit the lily and falcon motifs of Persian vassals and confirm the province’s Persian governance exactly as Ezra portrays. Population Movements in the Murašû Archive Hundreds of business tablets from Nippur (Murashu sons), 5th-century BC, list Judean names—“Hananiah son of Zerubbabel,” “Yaukin son of Gedaliah,” etc.—showing the dispersion and gradual return of Judeans as permitted by Persian policy, corroborating Ezra’s demographic framework. Elephantine Papyri and Worship in a Persian World Papyrus Cowley 40 (Year 17 of Darius II, 407 BC) petitions the Persian governor of Judah for permission to rebuild the Jewish temple at Elephantine after local opposition destroyed it. The language and procedure mirror Ezra 5:6-17, validating the practice of Jews appealing through Persian channels for temple reconstruction. Cyrus Cylinder as Precedent Lines 30-34: “I returned the sacred images to their shrines and let them dwell in eternal abodes; I also gathered all their people and returned them to their homes.” This policy explains why Tattenai does not close the project but seeks royal confirmation—he knows precedents exist. Converging Lines of Evidence 1. Cuneiform tablets name Tattenai precisely in 520–502 BC. 2. Official Aramaic style in Ezra 5 matches authenticated Persian correspondence. 3. Behistun and other inscriptions exhibit Darius’ pro-temple policies. 4. Archaeology in Jerusalem reveals a Persian-period rebuilding phase. 5. Elephantine papyri duplicate the letter-to-king protocol. 6. Manuscript evidence secures the text, while prophetic books provide synchronized dating. Conclusion Ezra 5:6 rests on verifiable governors, real diplomatic formats, corroborated chronological data, and archaeological strata. The convergence of Scripture, cuneiform archives, papyri, inscriptions, and material culture yields a coherent, multi-witness confirmation that the events unfolded exactly as recorded. |
    |