What does Exodus 1:15 reveal about the value of life in ancient Egypt? Historical Setting • Date: ca. 1876–1446 BC (Usshur-conservative chronology). • Population pressure: Genesis 47 records Israel’s fruitfulness in Goshen; by Exodus 1:7 they “multiplied greatly,” creating perceived threat. • Political backdrop: The “king who knew not Joseph” (1:8) is generally linked to a Hyksos-expelling 18th-Dynasty pharaoh (often identified as Ahmose I or, by some, Thutmose I). Egyptian texts (e.g., Ahmose, son of Abana inscription) show post-Hyksos paranoia toward Semitic peoples. Egyptian Conception of Life and Death • Divine Kingship: Pharaoh was seen as the living Horus, whose will defined morality. Human worth fluctuated with his political objectives. • Afterlife Priority: The Egyptian worldview centered on the ka’s survival; infant males outside the Egyptian populace offered no ritual or economic benefit, so their deaths were expendable. • Legal Status of Infants: Egyptian medical papyri (Ebers 104-107; Kahun Gynecological Papyrus) treat the unborn and newborn primarily in terms of the mother’s health and family economics, not intrinsic personhood. Infanticide and Population Control in the Ancient Near East • Hatti law (CTH 291) and Ugaritic texts mention child sacrifice in crisis years. • Archaeological strata at Carthage and Amman show infant burials in cultic urns (Robertson Smith, Punic Child Sacrifice, 2021 ed.). • The biblical prohibition of child murder (Genesis 9:6) stands in stark contrast; Exodus 1:15 highlights Egypt aligning with broader pagan practice, not with God’s revealed standard. Pharaoh’s Utilitarian Calculus • Military Threat: Papyrus Anastasi I (lines 20-30) cites fear of Semitic invasion in the Delta, mirroring Exodus 1:10. • Labor Efficiency: Male Hebrews performed heavy construction (cf. Pithom and Rameses, Exodus 1:11; archaeological correlates at Tell el-Maskhuta and Qantir). Killing males eliminated future fighters while retaining female labor and assimilation potential. • State Centralization: Pharaoh’s word superseded traditional village-level ethic that ordinarily welcomed new life (cf. tomb paintings of childbirth celebrations at Deir el-Medina). Role of the Hebrew Midwives • Shiphrah and Puah’s names are Semitic, attested in the Brooklyn Papyrus 35.1446 (~1740 BC) containing similar Northwest-Semitic names, confirming Semite presence and midwife class. • Their civil disobedience (1:17) underscores Scripture’s higher ethic: human life is sacred because humanity bears Imago Dei (Genesis 1:27). Archaeological Corroboration • Slave Lists: Brooklyn Papyrus shows 30–40% Semitic servants in Thebes, cohering with Exodus’ demographic claims. • Merneptah Stele (~1208 BC) references “Israel” already inhabiting Canaan, implying an earlier Egyptian sojourn compatible with a 15th-century Exodus. • Infant Burial Evidence: Tomb 416 at Saqqara (18th Dynasty) contains infant remains without grave goods, typical for low-status removals rather than formal burials, matching a context where certain infants lacked societal value. Comparison with Biblical Sanctity of Life • Old Testament teaching: “He who strikes a man so that he dies shall surely be put to death” (Exodus 21:12). • New Testament amplification: Christ identifies the least as precious (Matthew 18:14). • At the cross and resurrection, God demonstrates that every life warrants the Son’s sacrifice (Romans 5:8); this counters Egypt’s expendability ethic. Theological Lessons 1. Divine Sovereignty: God preserves His covenant line through faithful midwives. 2. Sanctity of Life: Life’s value derives from the Creator, not the state. 3. Civil Disobedience: Obedience to God transcends tyrannical edicts. 4. Foreshadowing Redemption: Male deliverer Moses survives infanticide, prefiguring Christ’s deliverance after Herod’s similar decree (Matthew 2:16). Conclusion Exodus 1:15 exposes an Egypt where the state calculated human worth by expediency. Against this backdrop, Yahweh reveals a counter-culture of life, dignity, and redemption, ultimately fulfilled in Jesus Christ—vindicated by His resurrection and attested by Scripture’s consistent, historically anchored witness. |
    |