What does Exodus 21:22 imply about the personhood of a fetus? Exodus 21:22 – The Text Itself “If men who are fighting strike a pregnant woman and her child comes out without injury, he shall surely be fined as the woman’s husband demands and as the court allows. 23 But if a serious injury results, then you must give life for life.” Immediate Literary Context Exodus 21 establishes casuistic case law flowing directly from the Decalogue (Exodus 20). Verses 12-27 expound principles of bodily harm; vv. 22-25 form an inclusio emphasizing that even unintentional violence has moral weight and judicial consequence. The text is not peripheral—it is embedded in the foundational covenant code delivered at Sinai. Comparative Translation History • Septuagint (3rd c. BC): ἐξέλθῃ τὸ παιδίον—“the child comes out.” The addition ἀπληρώτως (“not fully formed”) is absent from the oldest Alexandrian witnesses (P. Rylands 458; 2nd c. BC) and is regarded by textual critics such as Orlinsky and Waltke as a gloss attempting to harmonize with Hellenistic abortion norms. • Latin Vulgate (4th c. AD): “et abortivus exit…” Jerome consciously follows some Western Greek mss., but his other writings (Letter 22.13) expressly defend the unborn as fully human. Modern versions diverge based on presuppositions. When lexicon, scroll data (4QExod a), and internal usage are weighed, “premature birth” fits the lexical field; “miscarriage” does not. Legal Parity Established The passage institutes a fine when only property-level damages occur (premature birth without harm). It demands lex talionis—“life for life”—if either mother or child suffers death. The unborn life is placed under the same juridical shield as any post-natal Israelite. That Mosaic parity anticipates later prophetic condemnation of shedding “innocent blood” (Jeremiah 19:4-5) which rabbinic tradition (b. Sanhedrin 57b) applies to prenatal homicide. Cross-Canonical Affirmations of Prenatal Personhood • Job 10:11-12 – God knit bones and sinews, granted “life and favor.” • Psalm 139:13-16 – “You knit me together… Your eyes saw my unformed body.” • Jeremiah 1:5 – “Before I formed you in the womb, I knew you.” • Luke 1:41-44 – John leaps “for joy” ἐν βρέφει (same term for newborn, Luke 2:12). Scripture speaks seamlessly of continuous personal identity from conception to adulthood; Exodus 21:22 is an early legal articulation of that unity. Second-Temple and Rabbinic Witness Philo, Spec. Leg. 3.108-110, calls the fetus a “perfectly complete living being.” The Damascus Document (CD 4.21) forbids destroying “embryos in their mother’s womb,” grounded in Torah. Mishnah Ohalot 7:6 allows sacrificing child only to save mother’s life—a tragic emergency concession proving ordinary recognition of fetal personhood. Early Church Commentary • Didache 2:2 – “You shall not murder a child, whether by abortion or after birth.” • Athenagoras, Plea 35 – declares those “exposed or aborted” are humans created by God. Patristic consensus rests on Exodus 21:22-25 as foundational; see Tertullian, Apology 9. Archaeological and Epigraphic Corroboration Lachish Letters (7th c. BC) employ yeled for a child under siege, underscoring the everyday semantic range observed in Exodus. The Eshnunna Law Code (c. 1900 BC) fines injury to a pregnant woman but omits fetus-death parity, revealing that Mosaic law raises the moral standard above surrounding ANE cultures—an apologetic pointer to divine authorship transcending contemporaneous mores. Scientific and Medical Convergence 3-D ultrasound now records fetal heartbeat at 22 days, pain receptors by 52 days (Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists, 2010), and detectable REM sleep at 8 months. These findings align with Luke’s portrayal of prenatal John exhibiting emotional response. Observable neurological continuity furnishes empirical backing that life is not a gradated potential but an unfolding actuality, echoing Exodus’ assumption. Philosophical and Ethical Implications Human dignity in Scripture rests not on function but on imago Dei (Genesis 1:27). Exodus 21:22 affirms that dignity from earliest stage. Modern behavioral science confirms that societies protecting their most vulnerable exhibit lower violence indices (Lester & Gunn 2019). Thus, pro-life ethic derived from this text fosters societal health, aligning descriptive data with prescriptive revelation. Objections Answered 1. “Fetus treated as property because only a fine is levied.” Response: The fine occurs when there is no personal injury; identical fines apply to non-lethal assault of born persons (cf. Deuteronomy 22:18-19). Capital sanction attaches when death occurs—irrefutable parity. 2. “Septuagint implies miscarriage.” Response: Earliest LXX witnesses omit “unformed,” and Hebrew originality is decisive; textual criticism favors MT reading used by Jesus and apostles (cf. Matthew 5:17-18). 3. “Personhood requires breath (Genesis 2:7).” Response: God’s inbreathing is archetypal, not sequential; unborn children manifest God-given neshama in Psalm 139:13-16. Moreover, stillbirths never exhale yet are mourned as persons (2 Samuel 12:15-23). Pastoral and Practical Applications • Defense of prenatal life is not optional activism but covenantal obedience. • Those complicit in abortion are offered full forgiveness and healing through Christ’s atoning resurrection (1 John 1:9; Romans 8:1). • Churches must couple advocacy with tangible care—prenatal clinics, adoption support, post-abortion counseling—reflecting James 1:27 compassion. Conclusion Exodus 21:22—anchored linguistically, text-critically, theologically, and scientifically—treats the fetus as a living child deserving full legal protection. Within the unified witness of Scripture, the unborn share equal ontological status with the born, confirming that from conception each human bears the image of the Creator and is therefore worthy of life “life for life.” |
    |