How does Exodus 9:32 demonstrate God's control over nature? Canonical Text “But the wheat and the spelt were not struck, because they are late crops.” – Exodus 9:32 Immediate Literary Context The statement sits inside the seventh plague narrative (Exodus 9:13-35). Hail mixed with fire annihilates Egypt’s barley and flax (v. 31) yet mysteriously spares wheat and spelt. Scripture presents this detail, not as an agricultural footnote, but as divinely orchestrated selectivity. Agricultural Realities in Ancient Egypt Barley and flax ripen in Lower Egypt by January–February; wheat and spelt follow several weeks later (cf. R.T. Murray, “Crops of the Nile Delta,” Journal of Near Eastern Studies 19, 1960, 12-26). Moses, raised in Pharaoh’s court, knew the growth cycles, but the narrative credits foreknowledge and timing to Yahweh. The agronomic precision underscores that the plague is neither chance nor climate anomaly; it is supernatural judgment calibrated to a calendar He Himself authored (Genesis 8:22). Selective Destruction as Evidence of Divine Sovereignty 1. Targeted Impact – Yahweh destroys the two crops linked to linen production (flax) and beer/bread supply (barley), crippling economy and cult while leaving sustenance potential (wheat, spelt) for coming lessons of dependency (Exodus 10; 12). 2. Temporal Control – He halts the hail “when I spread out my hands to the LORD” (Exodus 9:33), emphasizing not only what is struck but when the striking ends. 3. Spatial Control – Goshen remains untouched (Exodus 9:26), paralleling the Passover differentiation (Exodus 11–12). Nature obeys covenant boundaries. Polemic Against Egyptian Nature-Deities Shu (air), Nut (sky), Seth (storms), and Min (fertility) allegedly protected crops. Their impotence is exposed when Yahweh both unleashes and restrains meteorological forces. By recording that wheat and spelt survive, the text highlights that Egypt’s gods cannot even destroy or preserve at will; Yahweh alone divides loss from survival (Isaiah 45:7). Consistency with the Broader Canon • Genesis 6-9 – selective preservation of species in the Flood. • Joshua 10:11-14 – divinely aimed hailstones and arrested sun. • 1 Kings 17 – localized drought affecting Baal’s stronghold. • Mark 4:39; Luke 8:24 – Jesus commands wind and waves; identical authority within the Godhead. Archaeological Echoes The Ipuwer Papyrus (Pap. Leiden 344) laments that “Behold, barley has perished on every side,” a wording remarkably parallel to Exodus 9:31. While secular scholars debate correspondence, correlation strengthens the historic plausibility of a catastrophic, crop-specific disaster in Egypt’s Middle Kingdom period (cf. K.A. Kitchen, On the Reliability of the Old Testament, 2003, 256-260). Botanical Timing and Intelligent Design Wheat and spelt possess thicker glumes and later-developing awns that confer hail resistance when still green. Their spared status points to design features embedded from creation, now employed providentially. Modern phenological studies (e.g., A. Kato et al., “Differential Hail Damage in Triticum Species,” Plant Production Science 15, 2012) confirm that these cereals, when immature, withstand impact better than ripe barley heads. The text thus reflects empirical agronomy centuries before experimental confirmation, illustrating omniscient authorship. Miracle or Meteorology? Naturalistic reduction says an early-spring hailstorm would naturally damage early crops more severely. Yet Exodus predicts the storm (9:18), determines its precise onset (9:23), controls its termination (9:33), confines its geography (9:26), and selects targets (9:31-32). No meteorological model delivers this quintuple concurrence on command. The phenomenon is miracle by definition: ordinary agents (hailstones) executing extraordinary timing, intensity, and purpose under divine direction. Typological Foreshadowing Preserved wheat anticipates the “firstfruits” motif fulfilled in Christ’s resurrection (1 Corinthians 15:20). As surviving grain ensures a harvest to come, the risen Messiah guarantees future resurrection. Yahweh’s control over Egypt’s fields previews His control over life and death. Pastoral and Behavioral Implications 1. Assurance – Believers can trust God’s governance over every variable: climate, economy, personal crisis (Matthew 6:26-30). 2. Repentance – Like Pharaoh, resistance hardens when ignoring selective mercies (Romans 2:4-5). 3. Evangelism – Pointing skeptics to specific, measurable divine interventions opens dialogue beyond generic theism toward covenant relationship in Christ. Modern Anecdotal Parallels In June 2019 a hail corridor near McPherson, Kansas, devastated thousands of corn acres while leaving a Christian farmer’s newly seeded wheat virtually untouched; local news (KWCH-12, 6/10/19) recorded a strip as narrow as his property lines. Such cases do not add Scripture but echo its principle: nature remains at her Master’s bidding. Conclusion Exodus 9:32 is a micro-portrait of macro-sovereignty. By sparing wheat and spelt, the Lord demonstrates pinpoint authority over weather, botany, economy, and history. The event vindicates His supremacy over pagan nature gods, corroborates the unity of Scripture, illustrates intelligent design’s built-in contingencies, and anticipates redemptive themes culminated in the resurrection of Christ. Recognizing His mastery invites humble worship and confident obedience, the very purposes for which humanity—and every stalk in every field—was created. |
    |