Genesis 14:4 vs Romans 13:1-2: Authority?
Compare Genesis 14:4 with Romans 13:1-2 on submitting to authority.

Scripture Texts

Genesis 14:4 – “For twelve years they had been subject to Chedorlaomer, but in the thirteenth year they rebelled.”

Romans 13:1-2 – “Everyone must submit himself to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except that which is from God. The authorities that exist have been appointed by God. Consequently, whoever resists authority is opposing what God has set in place, and those who do so will bring judgment on themselves.”


Historical Snapshot of Genesis 14

• Four Mesopotamian kings under Chedorlaomer dominated five Canaanite city-states (including Sodom and Gomorrah).

• After twelve years of tribute, the Canaanite coalition “rebelled,” triggering an international conflict.

• Scripture records the rebellion without explicit moral commentary; the focus quickly shifts to Abram’s rescue of Lot (vv. 13-16).


Authority Seen in Genesis 14

• Chedorlaomer’s reign is presented as a genuine, functioning authority recognized by surrounding nations.

• The Canaanite kings’ rebellion illustrates the natural human impulse to cast off oppressive rule, yet the text neither commends nor condemns their action.

• Abram does not join the rebellion; he intervenes only to rescue his family, maintaining a posture of separation from the politics of the day (cf. v. 23, refusing the king of Sodom’s reward).


Prescriptive Teaching in Romans 13

• Governing authority is “appointed by God”; therefore, submission is the default stance for the believer.

• Resisting lawful authority is equated with opposing God’s order and invites divine judgment.

• Paul writes under pagan Roman rule, affirming that even imperfect governments serve God’s purposes for maintaining societal order (cf. 1 Timothy 2:1-2).


How the Passages Complement, Not Contradict

• Narrative vs. Instruction: Genesis 14 is descriptive history; Romans 13 is direct apostolic exhortation.

• Different Subjects: Genesis records pagan kings rebelling against another pagan king; Romans addresses believers’ posture toward authority.

• Abram’s Example: Though living under the fallout of the rebellion, Abram models Romans 13-style submission—acting only when righteous duty (family rescue) compels him, then returning to a non-political stance.

• God’s Sovereign Hand: Both passages underscore that earthly thrones rise and fall under God’s overarching plan (cf. Daniel 2:21). Chedorlaomer’s temporary dominance and Rome’s imperial might each serve divine purposes beyond human sight.


Balancing Submission and Righteous Conscience

Romans 13 sets the norm; Acts 5:29 (“We must obey God rather than men”) reveals the exception.

• Old Testament examples—Hebrew midwives (Exodus 1), Daniel’s civil disobedience (Daniel 6), and Shadrach, Meshach, Abednego (Daniel 3)—show that resisting authority is justified only when obedience would mean direct disobedience to God.

• Nothing in Genesis 14 suggests the Canaanite kings revolted for righteousness’ sake; their motives appear political, not spiritual.


Lessons for Today

• Recognize the divine origin of all lawful authority and adopt a default posture of respect and obedience.

• Evaluate any impulse to “rebel” by asking whether the issue is moral obedience to God or merely personal preference or political gain.

• Follow Abram’s pattern: stay separate from ungodly power struggles, intervene only when clear moral duty arises, and guard your witness by refusing worldly rewards for righteous actions.

• Trust God’s sovereignty over governments—whether oppressive like Chedorlaomer’s coalition or complex like modern states—knowing He uses even flawed rulers to accomplish His redemptive purposes (Proverbs 21:1).

How does Genesis 14:4 illustrate consequences of rebellion against authority?
Top of Page
Top of Page