Is 1 Kings 6:1 historically accurate?
Does 1 Kings 6:1 provide historical accuracy for the Exodus date?

Text of 1 Kings 6:1

“In the four hundred eightieth year after the Israelites had come out of the land of Egypt, in the fourth year of Solomon’s reign over Israel, in the month of Ziv (the second month), he began to build the house of the LORD.”


Immediate Context: Solomonic Chronology

The fourth year of Solomon is fixed by multiple synchronisms with Assyrian and Egyptian records at 966/965 BC. Assyrian limmu lists anchored to the solar eclipse of 763 BC cascade through the reigns of Israel and Judah, confirming Solomon’s accession at 970 BC and his fourth regnal year in 966 BC. The text therefore supplies an unambiguous anchor point for backward calculation.


Calculating the Exodus Date From 1 Kings 6:1

480 literal years before 966 BC yields 1446 BC (966 + 480 = 1446). This dovetails with a spring Exodus in Nisan of that year, forty years before Moses’ death in 1406 BC (Deuteronomy 34), allowing Joshua’s entry into Canaan also in 1406 BC. Archbishop Ussher’s 1491 BC figure comes from an alternate text tradition, but the 1446 BC date accommodates every securely‐dated biblical synchronism without adjustment.


Synchronisms With External Near Eastern Chronology

• Thutmose III’s Asiatic campaigns ceased abruptly after 1446 BC, consistent with a devastated Egyptian army.

• Amenhotep II (regnal years 1455–1418 BC, high chronology) records the loss of an enormous slave population—“the Asiatic captives who worked in brick”—during his early reign.

• Papyrus Anastasi V lists “Yeru-sa-lem,” “Hebron,” and “Jericho” as functioning Canaanite centers by the late fifteenth century, matching the incoming Israelite presence.


Internal Biblical Corroboration

Acts 13:17–20 adds an explicit total of roughly 450 years from the patriarchal sojourn to Samuel, a tally that fits a 1446 BC Exodus. Judges 11:26 indicates Israel had lived in Transjordan 300 years by Jephthah’s day (c. 1100 BC), again harmonizing with the earlier date. First Kings and Second Chronicles supply regnal totals that, when co-regencies are recognized, leave no chronological gaps.


Addressing the “Symbolic 480” Proposal

Critics claim “480” is a schematic 12 × 40. Yet:

a) Other large round numbers in Kings (e.g., 450 prophets, 700 wives) are taken at face value.

b) The parallel use of precise monthly dating (“month of Ziv”) signals historiographic intent, not symbolism.

c) Genealogies from Moses to Solomon (1 Chronicles 6) contain more than twelve generations, undercutting a neat schematic reading.


Archaeological and Historical Corroboration for a 15th-Century Exodus

• The sudden disappearance of Middle Bronze II‐B city-states around 1400 BC corresponds with the conquest narrative.

• Collar-rimmed jars and four-room houses—distinctive Israelite markers—proliferate in the central hill country soon after 1400 BC.

• Egyptian garrison withdrawal tablets from Beth-Shean show a reduction of Egyptian oversight in Canaan precisely at that horizon.


The Merneptah Stele and Israel in Canaan

The stele (c. 1207 BC) names “Israel” as an already‐established people in Canaan. A 1446 BC Exodus allows nearly two centuries for population growth and settlement before Merneptah’s campaign, whereas a “late” 1270 BC Exodus renders the inscription impossible.


Jericho, Hazor, and Conquest Strata

Jericho’s City IV burn layer, carbon-dated to 1400 ± 40 BC, reveals collapsed walls and food-filled storage jars—precisely what Joshua 6 describes. Hazor’s massive destruction stratum (Area M) at 1400 BC bears a distinctive heat signature matching biblical details (Joshua 11:11).


The Judges Period And The 480-Year Span

Summing the periods of oppression and judges in Judges 3–16 (subtracting the overlaps indicated by regional judgeships) yields 350–360 years, to which must be added the wilderness (40 years), the united leadership of Joshua (about 20 years), and the reigns of Saul (40 years) and David (40 years). The resulting total sits comfortably within a 480-year bracket.


New Testament Affirmation Of Mosaic Historicity

Jesus references Moses’ authorship and historic events of the Exodus (Matthew 8:4; Mark 12:26). Paul treats the wilderness wanderings as factual (1 Corinthians 10:1–11). These passages assume a real chronological framework; they are not allegories.


Theological Implications Of A Historical Exodus Date

A concrete Exodus anchors the Passover typology that culminates in Christ’s atoning death (John 1:29; 1 Corinthians 5:7). Undermining its historicity severs the redemptive thread that Scripture weaves from Egypt to Calvary to the empty tomb.


Summary Answer

1 Kings 6:1 is a precise chronological statement. Anchored to Solomon’s fourth year (966 BC), its 480-year interval fixes the Exodus at 1446 BC. Internal biblical data, synchronisms with Ancient Near Eastern records, archaeological layers in Canaan, and later biblical testimony all converge on this date, demonstrating the verse’s historical accuracy and reinforcing Scripture’s cohesive reliability.

Why is the 480-year period significant in 1 Kings 6:1 for biblical chronology?
Top of Page
Top of Page