Is Luke 6:29 about Christian non-violence?
Does Luke 6:29 promote pacifism or non-violence as a Christian doctrine?

Text Of Luke 6:29

“To the one who strikes you on the cheek, offer the other also; and from him who takes your cloak, do not withhold your tunic as well.”


Immediate Context

Luke 6:27-36 belongs to Jesus’ “Sermon on the Plain,” a unit addressing interpersonal ethics for disciples. The repeated refrain “Love your enemies” (vv. 27, 35) frames verse 29 as one illustration of love that refuses personal retaliation. The verbs are all second-person singular, emphasizing individual responses rather than public policy.


Old Testament Background

1. Proverbs 24:29 forbids repaying evil.

2. Isaiah 50:6 prophetically pictures the Servant offering His back and cheeks.

3. Exodus 22:2 allows lethal defense against night burglars, indicating no blanket pacifism in Torah. Therefore Luke 6:29 continues the spirit of voluntary non-revenge while preserving the legitimacy of self-defense laws.


Inter-Testamental And Second-Temple Parallels

The Qumran “Community Rule” (1QS 10.17) exhorts members not to “repay a man his recompense,” demonstrating that non-retaliatory ideals pre-date Jesus yet without abolishing military participation by Judeans under Rome.


New Testament Synthesis

Matthew 5:39 parallels Luke 6:29, limiting context to “evil done to you” (τῷ πονηρῷ).

Romans 12:17-21 commands believers to leave vengeance to God while recognizing the state’s sword in Romans 13:1-4.

Luke 22:36 instructs disciples to buy a sword for imminent dangers; Peter’s later misuse (22:50-51) receives correction, not universal prohibition.

Together these passages affirm personal non-retaliation yet accept legitimate protective force under certain circumstances.


Historical Theology

Early church writers reflect diverse applications:

• Justin Martyr (First Apology 39) praises Christians who refuse personal revenge.

• Tertullian’s On Idolatry 19 criticizes military service, yet contemporaneous churches hosted soldier-saints (e.g., martyrdom of Maurice, c. AD 287).

• Augustine’s City of God 19.17 defends just war while upholding Luke 6:29 as an inward posture.

Consensus: verse 29 is ethical counsel shaping the believer’s heart, not a civil statute.


Philosophical And Behavioral Observations

Behavioral studies on retaliation (e.g., McCullough 2008, Christian Journal of Positive Psychology) reveal cyclical aggression escalates conflict, whereas forgiveness interventions reduce hostility—empirically supporting Jesus’ strategy for societal flourishing.


Practical Application

1. Personal interactions: surrender the right to revenge; pursue reconciliation (Matthew 18:15-17).

2. Vocational duties (military, law enforcement): exercise force under Romans 13 authority, tempered by mercy.

3. Persecution scenarios: accept suffering for Christ (1 Peter 2:20-23) while utilizing lawful appeal (Acts 25:11).


Answer To The Question

Luke 6:29 teaches individual disciples to relinquish personal retaliation and demonstrate radical love toward offenders. It does not institute absolute pacifism or prohibit defensive action by individuals, families, or governments. Scripture harmonizes personal non-violence with legitimate protective force, leaving ultimate justice to God while calling believers to model Christlike mercy.

How should Christians interpret 'turn the other cheek' in Luke 6:29 in modern society?
Top of Page
Top of Page