Modern take on "turn the other cheek"?
How should Christians interpret "turn the other cheek" in Luke 6:29 in modern society?

Canonical Text

“If someone strikes you on one cheek, turn to him the other also; and if someone takes your cloak, do not withhold your tunic as well.” — Luke 6:29


Immediate Literary Context

Luke 6 records Jesus’ “Sermon on the Plain,” a collection of imperatives that mirror the Sermon on the Mount (Matthew 5–7). Verses 27-36 center on loving enemies, blessing persecutors, and relinquishing personal vengeance. Luke’s Greek verbs are present imperatives (τύπτῃ—“is striking,” αἴρῃ—“is taking”), underscoring repeated, habitual responses rather than a single dramatic moment.


Old Testament Foundations

1. Leviticus 19:18 commands, “You shall not take vengeance.”

2. Proverbs 20:22 counsels, “Do not say, ‘I will repay evil.’”

3. Isaiah’s Suffering Servant “gave His back to those who strike” (Isaiah 50:6).

Christ’s words do not abrogate the Mosaic Law but reveal its heart: self-sacrificial love that trusts divine justice (Deuteronomy 32:35).


Cultural and Rabbinic Background

First-century Jews viewed a slap as an insult more than a mortal threat (cf. Mishnah Bava Kamma 8:6). Roman civil law also distinguished between personal affronts and life-endangering assaults. Jesus addresses personal insults and petty theft, not governmental justice or wartime defense.


Parallel Passages and Canonical Harmony

Matthew 5:39 parallels Luke 6:29 but adds “do not resist an evil person,” clarifying the sphere: private retaliation. Paul echoes this in Romans 12:17-21 and leaves room for state authority to punish evil (Romans 13:1-4). Hence “turn the other cheek” governs personal ethics, not the magistrate’s sword.


Theological Core: Imitation of Christ and Trust in Divine Justice

1 Peter 2:23 notes that Jesus “did not retaliate when reviled,” choosing the cross and vindicating resurrection (cf. Habermas’ “minimal-facts” data set). Turning the cheek does not deny justice; it postpones it to God’s court, where resurrection assures ultimate rectification (Acts 17:31).


Limits: Self-Defense, Protection of Others, and Civil Authority

Scripture affirms protecting life (Exodus 22:2-3; Nehemiah 4:14). Jesus Himself evades lethal violence (Luke 4:29-30) and commends Roman centurions (Luke 7:2-10). Therefore, believers may defend against murderous threat or protect the vulnerable while refusing personal revenge.


Practical Application in Modern Society

• Personal Insult: Respond with grace; relinquish lawsuits over trivial damages (1 Corinthians 6:7).

• Social Media Hostility: Answer with blessing or silence (Proverbs 26:4-5).

• Workplace Offense: Forgive, seek reconciliation, and utilize proper channels without malice (Ephesians 4:31-32).

• Civil Protest: Advocate justice peacefully (Acts 16:37) while eschewing retaliatory violence.


Psychological and Behavioral Insights

Empirical studies on forgiveness (e.g., Stanford Forgiveness Project) show lowered cortisol, reduced depression, and strengthened relationships, affirming the Creator’s design that obedience blesses both soul and body (Proverbs 3:7-8).


Historical Illustrations

• Early martyrs like Polycarp prayed for executioners.

• Corrie ten Boom forgave Nazi guards, catalyzing post-war reconciliation.

• Modern believers in persecuted regions report conversions of aggressors after non-retaliatory witness.


Common Misconceptions Addressed

1. “Christians must be doormats.” — Scripture calls believers “salt” and “light,” agents of truth and justice (Matthew 5:13-16).

2. “Pacifism is mandatory.” — Military service is not condemned (Luke 3:14; Acts 10).

3. “Legal action is forbidden.” — Paul appeals to Roman law (Acts 25:11) yet never for revenge.


Eschatological Motivation

Because final judgment is certain (Revelation 20:11-15), Christians can absorb present injustice knowing God “will repay” (Romans 12:19). Turning the other cheek signals confidence in Christ’s resurrection and coming reign.


Summary

Luke 6:29 mandates relinquishing personal retaliation, modeling the cross, and testifying to God’s justice. In modern society, believers practice courageous forgiveness, protect the innocent, and pursue public righteousness while trusting God to vindicate every wrong.

How does Luke 6:29 challenge our natural instincts for retaliation?
Top of Page
Top of Page