How does Jeremiah 4:28 challenge the belief in God's unchanging nature? Key Passage (Jeremiah 4:28) “Therefore the earth will mourn and the heavens above will grow dark, because I have spoken; I have purposed; I will not relent, nor will I turn back.” Overview of the Question Some readers suppose that if God ever announces an intention He will not reverse (“I will not relent”) while at other times Scripture records Him as relenting (e.g., Jonah 3:10; Jeremiah 18:8), the doctrine of divine immutability is threatened. In fact, the verse displays—not undermines—God’s unchanging character once its literary, theological, and lexical setting is understood. Immediate Literary Context Jeremiah 4:23–31 portrays cosmic de-creation—language echoing Genesis 1:2—to announce Judah’s impending judgment. God’s fixed decree of devastation (4:27) is balanced by His covenant promise, “yet I will not make a full end.” Verse 28 seals the oracle: the mourning earth and darkened heavens dramatize that what God has decreed will stand. The context is decisive judgment on a hardened generation, not a universal statement that God never responds to repentance. Divine Immutability in Scripture 1 Samuel 15:29; Numbers 23:19; Malachi 3:6; James 1:17; Hebrews 13:8 all explicitly ground God’s faithfulness in His unchangeable nature. Jeremiah himself elsewhere rests hope on the same reality (Lamentations 3:22–23). Scripture therefore affirms both: • God’s being, attributes, and ultimate purposes never change. • God genuinely engages, responds, and judges within time. Apparent Tensions with “God Relented” Passages Jeremiah 18:7-10 sketches the principle: if a nation repents, God may “relent” of pronounced judgment; if it sins, blessing may be withdrawn. This conditional formula is itself an expression of God’s immutable holiness and mercy. His responses vary because His moral character never varies. In Jonah 3:10 God relents because Nineveh meets the stated condition of repentance. In Jeremiah 4 the people refuse to repent (4:1-4, 14, 22), therefore the announced sentence is irrevocable. Classical Theism vs. Open Theism Open theists claim Jeremiah 4:28 locks God into an unforeseen in-time decision, implying change. Classical Christian theism observes: 1. The statement “I have purposed” reflects an eternal decree, not a time-bound improvisation. 2. God’s interaction language is accommodated communication (anthropopathism), comparable to scientific models that simplify without misinforming (e.g., describing quantum behavior with particle imagery). Ancient Near Eastern Background Near-Eastern deities were capricious; their promises were unreliable. Jeremiah’s God contrasts starkly: His decisions are ethically consistent. Ketef Hinnom silver scrolls (c. 7th century BC) already record the Aaronic Blessing (Numbers 6:24-26) in virtually identical form to the Masoretic Text, illustrating a stable covenant-keeping conception of Yahweh long before Jeremiah wrote. Philosophical Coherence An unchanging God cannot decide today what He did not know yesterday. Yet an eternal decree can be temporally executed. The philosopher’s distinction between ontological immutability (no alteration in essence, decree, moral character) and relational mutability (dynamic engagement with creatures) fully accounts for biblical data. Modern physics offers an analogy: the fine-structure constant appears immutably fixed, while the phenomena it governs fluctuate. The constancy of the law allows variable outcomes; so God’s changeless nature governs variable historical judgments. Answer to the Challenge Jeremiah 4:28 does not depict God altering His essence; it underscores the steadfastness of His resolve when righteousness demands judgment. The verse magnifies, rather than diminishes, the doctrine of divine immutability: the same God whose unchanging holiness once decreed Judah’s devastation later, in the fullness of time, immutably decreed salvation through the risen Christ. Far from challenging belief in God’s unchanging nature, Jeremiah 4:28 illuminates it—displaying a moral constancy that is both fearsome in judgment and glorious in redemption. |
    |