Jesus' view on the Law in Luke 10:26?
What does Jesus imply about the importance of the Law in Luke 10:26?

Text of Luke 10:26

“Jesus replied, ‘What is written in the Law? How do you read it?’”


Immediate Narrative Setting

A Torah-expert tests Jesus with, “Teacher, what must I do to inherit eternal life?” (v 25). Instead of offering a new code, Jesus immediately redirects him to the existing revelation: “What is written…?” By posing two rapid-fire questions, Jesus not only affirms the Law’s sufficiency but also presses the scholar toward personal engagement—“How do you read it?” The form is both authoritative and Socratic, drawing the listener into self-evaluation before the covenant text.


The Law as Foundational Revelation

1. Covenant Charter: In Exodus 19–24 Yahweh constitutes Israel as His “kingdom of priests.” Jesus’ question presupposes that charter remains binding as the definitive witness to God’s moral will.

2. Unbroken Continuity: Matthew 5:17-18, Luke 16:17, and John 10:35 (“Scripture cannot be broken”) confirm that Jesus never treats the Mosaic corpus as obsolete. Luke 10:26 is a practical outworking of that stance.

3. Soteriological Signpost: Galatians 3:24 identifies the Law as a paidagōgos “leading us to Christ.” By forcing the lawyer back to Torah, Jesus steers him toward the very tutor that will escort him to grace.


Scriptural Authority and Hermeneutics

• “What is written…?” lifts the written word (graphē) above oral tradition or contemporary speculation.

• “How do you read it?” implies that correct interpretation (hermēneia) matters; the Law is not a talisman but a text demanding thoughtful engagement (cf. Ezra 7:10; Nehemiah 8:8).


Synthesis with the Greatest Commandments

The scholar responds by merging Deuteronomy 6:5 and Leviticus 19:18 (v 27). Jesus confirms: “You have answered correctly” (v 28). The episode demonstrates that:

a) The essence of the Law is love of God and neighbor.

b) Proper reading unveils that essence—not legalistic minutiae but relational devotion.

c) Eternal life concerns the heart-orientation prescribed in Torah, fulfilled in Christ (Romans 10:4).


Comparison with Other Synoptic Parallels

Mark 12:28-34—a scribe hears Jesus identify the two great commandments; the response “You are right” parallels Luke 10:28, reinforcing canonical unity.

Matthew 22:34-40—Jesus cites the same texts, adding, “All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments,” showing Jesus’ consistent prioritization.


Second-Temple and Rabbinic Background

Contemporary rabbis summarized Torah (e.g., Hillel’s “What is hateful to you, do not do to your neighbor”). Jesus’ method fits accepted pedagogy yet radicalizes it by requiring wholehearted love for Yahweh through Himself as Messiah (cf. John 14:6).


Patristic Witness

Irenaeus (Adv. Haer. 4.12.5) notes that the Lord “commended the words of the Law, summing them in love.” Augustine (De Doctr. Christ. 1.26) asserts that “Whoever thinks he has understood Scripture… if he has not built up the twin love of God and neighbor, he has not understood it.” The Fathers saw Luke 10:26 as Christ’s validation of the Law’s moral essence.


Archaeological Corroborations

• Ketef Hinnom silver amulets (7th cent. BC) containing the priestly blessing confirm the early circulation of Torah texts cited by Jesus.

• First-century synagogue inscriptions from Gamla and Magdala reference the Shema, indicating the centrality of Deuteronomy 6 in daily worship.


Practical Discipleship Implications

1. Scripture-First Approach: Believers must default to “What is written?” for doctrinal and ethical questions.

2. Reflective Reading: Adopt lectio continua and inductive study methods to answer “How do you read it?”

3. Integrated Love: Orthodoxy (right belief) and orthopraxy (right practice) converge in love that fulfills Law (Romans 13:8-10).


Conclusion

In Luke 10:26 Jesus underscores the Law’s enduring authority, the necessity of sound interpretation, and the Law’s ultimate trajectory toward love—fully realized in Himself. Far from diminishing Torah, He upholds it as the revelatory bedrock that, when rightly read, leads to eternal life through the Messiah.

How does Luke 10:26 challenge personal interpretation of the Scriptures?
Top of Page
Top of Page