How does John 7:3 challenge the belief in Jesus' divinity? Text and Immediate Setting “So His brothers said to Him, ‘Leave here and go to Judea, so that Your disciples may see the works You are doing.’ ” (John 7:3) The remark is made in Galilee, just before the Feast of Tabernacles, by siblings who at that moment “did not believe in Him” (v. 5). Surface Objection: If His Brothers Doubted, How Could He Be Divine? Critics argue that the skepticism of close relatives suggests Jesus was merely an ordinary man. Ancient Near-Eastern honor-shame culture viewed family endorsement as crucial; lack of it might appear to undermine messianic or divine claims. Contextual Johannine Christology 1. The very Gospel that records this unbelief begins with the categorical declaration, “the Word was God” (John 1:1) and culminates in Thomas’s confession, “My Lord and my God!” (20:28). 2. John frequently places misunderstanding or unbelief in narrative tension to heighten later revelation (cf. 2:19–22; 6:41–42). The brothers’ doubt functions literarily to contrast with post-resurrection faith. Progressive Revelation Within the Family • Acts 1:14 lists Jesus’ brothers among the earliest believers gathered in prayer after the Ascension. • 1 Corinthians 15:7 records a specific resurrection appearance to “James,” corroborated by Josephus (Ant. 20.200) who notes James’ later martyrdom as leader of the Jerusalem church. • The canonical epistles of James and Jude open with self-descriptions as “slave of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ,” providing written evidence that former skeptics became convinced of His deity. Human Skepticism as Evidence of Authenticity Behavioral research underscores that family members are least prone to accept exalted claims without compelling evidence. Their eventual belief after the resurrection is a powerful apologetic datum (minimal-facts approach): alternative explanations—legend, hallucination—fail to account for the turnaround of multiple siblings (see Habermas & Licona, The Case for the Resurrection, ch. 9). Incarnation: Full Humanity Does Not Negate Full Deity Philippians 2:6-8 affirms that the pre-existent Son “emptied Himself” by taking on human form. Experiencing familial misunderstanding is part of real humanity, not a denial of divine nature. Hebrews 2:17 notes He was “made like His brothers in every way” yet without sin (4:15). Miraculous Signs Authenticate Divine Identity John organizes seven signs before the cross; the Feast of Tabernacles discourse (chs. 7-8) pivots to Jesus’ declaration, “before Abraham was born, I am!” (8:58). The brothers’ suggestion to perform works publicly ironically anticipates His resurrection—“the sign of Jonah” (Matthew 12:39)—validated by multiple lines of historical evidence: empty tomb, post-mortem appearances, rapid proclamation in Jerusalem, and conversion of hostile witnesses (James, Paul). Archaeological and Extra-Biblical Corroboration • The ossuary inscribed “James son of Joseph brother of Jesus” (prob. 1st cent.) situates the family historically. • The Pool of Siloam (John 9) and the Bethesda colonnades (John 5) have been uncovered exactly where John describes them, reinforcing the Gospel’s reliability. A document that proves accurate in mundane details is trustworthy in theological assertions (Luke 16:10 principle). Philosophical Synthesis 1. Premise: If God exists and can create the universe, He can enter it. 2. Premise: Historical evidence shows Jesus rose from the dead. 3. Therefore, His contemporaneous family doubt is subsumed under a greater confirmatory event; finite perspectives cannot overturn verified divine self-disclosure. Conclusion John 7:3 does not undermine Jesus’ divinity; it reinforces the historical credibility of the Gospel by transparently recording early disbelief later overcome by witnessed resurrection. The verse highlights the authentic humanity of Christ, sets up a narrative contrast for later faith, and, when read in full canonical, textual, historical, and philosophical context, ultimately supports rather than challenges the doctrine that Jesus is fully God and fully man. |
    |