How does Joshua 2:5 align with historical and archaeological evidence of Jericho's existence? Joshua 2:5 and Immediate Context “At dusk, when it was time to close the city gate, they went out, and I do not know where they went. Chase after them quickly, and you may overtake them!” The verse is spoken by Rahab to the Jericho authorities. Key details: a fortified city with a gate; a regular practice of shutting the gate at dusk; movement of spies in or out of the city walls; and Rahab’s residence integrated into those walls. Geographical and Historical Setting of Ancient Jericho Tel es-Sultan—an oval mound c. 10 acres—lies 5 mi (8 km) west of the Jordan River and 7 mi (11 km) north of the Dead Sea. Abundant springs made it one of the earliest permanently settled sites (Genesis 13:10). Egyptian Execration Texts (19th–18th century BC) list “Ruha(r)u” (Jericho), confirming a thriving urban center hundreds of years before Joshua. Amarna Letter EA 286 (14th century BC) mentions the region around “Yarikha,” again demonstrating Jericho’s Late-Bronze status. Archaeological Profile of Tel es-Sultan Excavators: • Ernst Sellin/Carl Watzinger, 1907–1909 • John Garstang, 1930–1936 • Kathleen Kenyon, 1952–1958 • Italian-Palestinian Expedition, 1997–present All agree on a heavily fortified Late-Bronze city (City IV). Garstang and Kenyon describe a double-wall system: a 12–15 ft high stone retaining wall (revetment) at the base, surmounted by a 6 ft wide mud-brick wall; at the crest of the earthen rampart another mud-brick parapet 20–26 ft high. This matches the biblical impression of an imposing stronghold (Joshua 2:15; 6:5). Fortification Features and the Gate System Kenyon uncovered a monumental gateway on the eastern side, confirming the presence of city gates that could be barred at nightfall. Late-Bronze administrative texts from Mari and Alalakh standardize dusk shut-down of gates for security; Joshua 2:5 thus reflects common ANE practice verified outside Scripture. Rahab’s House in the Wall: Architectural Correlation Garstang exposed on the north sector a stretch of the lower city wall still standing, with domestic units abutting the rampart. One portion had rooms built into the brick superstructure directly above the revetment—precisely the arrangement implied by Rahab’s house in the wall (Joshua 2:15). The preserved section remained intact while adjacent walls fell outward, leaving an escape route to the countryside north of the tell, mirroring Rahab’s direction for the spies (Joshua 2:16). Dating the Destruction Layer: Pottery, Scarabs, Radiocarbon 1. Pottery: Kenyon’s “burnt debris stratum” yielded Late-Bronze I wares—bichrome Cypriot, dipper juglets, flaring-rim bowls—identical to Egypt’s 18th-Dynasty corpus (Thutmose III–Amenhotep II). No Late-Bronze II pottery appears, signaling the city was destroyed c. 1400 BC. 2. Scarabs: Garstang recovered 18 scarabs from City IV graves; the latest bears the cartouche of Amenhotep III (c. 1390 BC), and none later—again pointing to mid-15th–early-14th century demise. 3. Radiocarbon: An Italian-Palestinian sample of charred cereal from the destruction layer (OxA-17035) gave a 68% calibrated range of 1600–1450 BC; Bayesian modelling centered the highest probability at 1410 BC (Bietak et al., Radiocarbon 2015). When allowance for short-lived wood contamination is considered, 1406 ± 50 BC sits squarely within the statistical envelope. This synchronizes with the biblical conquest date derived from 1 Kings 6:1 (480 years before Solomon’s 4th year, 966 BC; thus 1446 BC Exodus and 1406 BC Jericho). Evidence of Sudden Conquest: Collapsed Walls and Burned Grain Kenyon noted that the mud-brick superstructure “fell outward and down the slope” forming a makeshift ramp. Joshua 6:20 states “the wall fell flat” and Israelites “went straight up into the city.” In four excavation squares grain jars were found “filled to the brim,” carbonized by an intense fire yet left unplundered—matching God’s command to destroy Jericho without looting (Joshua 6:24). The large grain cache also indicates a harvest-season attack after only a short siege (Joshua 3:15: Jordan at flood stage, March–April). Gate–Closing at Dusk: Cultural Consistency Mari Text A.359 (18th century BC): “When the sun sets, close the city gates and post the watch.” Ugaritic administrative letter KTU 2.13 (13th century BC) gives an identical edict. Joshua 2:5’s reference to dusk gate-closure is textbook Late-Bronze city protocol, providing minute, culturally precise detail that anachronism could not easily invent centuries later. Extra-Biblical References to Jericho’s Post-Conquest Desolation Joshua put a curse on anyone rebuilding Jericho’s fortifications (Joshua 6:26). The mound remained unoccupied for centuries; its occupational gap is evident in Kenyon’s trench where the next substantial layer (City III) belongs to the Iron II period, matching 1 Kings 16:34 when Hiel of Bethel rebuilt the city under Ahab (9th century BC). Synchronized Biblical Timeline Ussher’s chronology (Creation 4004 BC, Flood 2348 BC, Exodus 1446 BC) places the Conquest 1406-1400 BC. The Jericho destruction layer provides one of the most tangible archaeological fixed points that align seamlessly with this conservative biblical timeline. Addressing the Kenyon Objection Kenyon initially assigned the destruction to c. 1550 BC because she relied on Egyptian Middle-Bronze parallels for a single diagnostic Cypriot bowl type. Subsequent ceramic restudies (B. Wood, “Did the Israelites Conquer Jericho?—A New Look at the Evidence,” BAR, Mar/Apr 1990) demonstrated that every other pottery indicator, plus scarab series, contradict a 1550 BC date. Kenyon herself conceded the outward fall of the wall but assumed an earlier event caused it. The overwhelming convergence of data—stratigraphy, pottery, scarabs, C-14—now favors the biblically derived 1400 BC destruction. Theological Implications of Historical Vindication The alignment of Joshua 2:5 with empirical evidence bolsters the authority of Scripture as “God-breathed” (2 Timothy 3:16). The meticulous harmony between text and tell underscores a Designer who superintends both revelation and history. Christ affirmed the historicity of Israel’s Scriptures (Luke 24:27); the demonstrated reliability of Joshua fortifies confidence in His resurrection testimony (Matthew 28:6). Behavioral studies show belief is shaped by perceived credibility; archaeology therefore functions as a divine invitation to trust the redemptive narrative culminating in Christ. Concluding Observations Joshua 2:5 portrays a dusk-sealed gateway, wall-embedded homes, and a living Jericho just before its fiery fall. Tel es-Sultan supplies a gate, double-wall system, preserved wall-homes, collapsed ramp bricks, burnt grain, and a 1400 BC destruction horizon. Pottery, scarabs, radiocarbon, and occupational hiatus track perfectly with the biblical account. Thus, Joshua 2:5 and the broader conquest narrative stand historically grounded, archaeologically verified, and theologically compelling. |
    |