What does Josiah's decision in 2 Chronicles 35:22 reveal about human free will? Canonical Text “Josiah, however, did not turn away from him, but disguised himself to fight him. He did not listen to the words of Necho from the mouth of God, but went to fight him on the plain of Megiddo.” (2 Chronicles 35:22) Historical Setting Pharaoh Necho II’s northward march in 609 BC is independently confirmed by the Babylonian Chronicle (BM 21946) and Egyptian inscriptions from Karnak, situating the biblical scene firmly in the late–7th-century Near East. Excavations at Tel Megiddo—directed in part by the late Prof. Israel Finkelstein—have uncovered layers of burned debris and weaponry consistent with major military movements in this very period. The synchrony of text and archaeology undergirds the historical reliability of Chronicles and frames Josiah’s decision as a concrete act, not myth. Narrative Flow in Chronicles The Chronicler has just celebrated Josiah’s unparalleled Passover (35:1-19). The abrupt pivot to an ill-advised military venture intensifies the contrast between covenant faithfulness and a single catastrophic choice. The device echoes an earlier pattern: Asa (ch. 16) and Uzziah (ch. 26) both finished poorly despite godly beginnings, highlighting the consequences of a will set against divine counsel. Intertextual Links • 1 Kings 22:30-35—Ahab “disguised himself” (hitchapeś) and fell at Ramoth-gilead. Josiah repeats the tactic with the same fatal outcome, a literary signal that the Chronicler sees patterns in choices. • Deuteronomy 30:19—Life and death are “set before” Israel, underscoring genuine moral alternatives. • Proverbs 16:9—“A man’s heart plans his course, but the LORD directs his steps.” Josiah’s plan and God’s overruling coexist without contradiction. Divine Sovereignty & Human Agency Scripture portrays free will as compatible with God’s exhaustive foreknowledge and providence (Acts 2:23; Isaiah 46:10). Josiah’s liberty was: 1. Real—He could obey or ignore Necho’s divinely sourced warning. 2. Limited—God had already declared through Huldah (2 Kings 22:20) that Josiah would die before Judah’s judgment; the king’s choice determined the means, not the fact, of his death. 3. Consequential—His disobedience reshaped Judah’s political future, accelerating Babylonian dominance. Thus, Chronicles teaches libertarian moral responsibility within a providential framework often labeled “compatibilism.” Free Will Defined Biblically 1. Ability to deliberate (Isaiah 1:18). 2. Capacity to choose contrary desires (Galatians 5:17 assumes conflict). 3. Accountability before a moral lawgiver (Romans 2:15-16). Josiah’s episode affirms all three: he processed Necho’s message, chose contrarily, and bore the consequence. Case Study Summary • Revelation given: “words of Necho from the mouth of God.” • Human response: active refusal, tactical deception, direct engagement. • Outcome: fatal wounding, national lament (35:23-25). The passage reveals that even a regenerate, Torah-saturated king retains the freedom—and the peril—of rejecting fresh divine instruction. Archaeological Corroboration • A glazed brick inscription naming Necho II housed in the Oriental Institute aligns the pharaoh’s historical existence with Chronicles. • Bullae stamped “Nathan-Melech, servant of the king” (excavated in the City of David, 2019) date to Josiah’s reign and corroborate the royal administration described in 2 Kings 23:11, strengthening the chronicle’s milieu. Such finds demonstrate that the biblical authors recorded verifiable history, lending weight to their theological claims about free will and covenant. Philosophical Considerations Contemporary analytic philosophy distinguishes between causal determinism and theological determination. Scripture depicts God’s decree as personal rather than mechanistic, allowing for responsive relationship. Josiah’s choice is neither random nor coerced; it is a purposive act situated within God’s metanarrative—exactly the compatibilist structure defended by Augustine, the Reformers, and modern analytic theologians. Practical Theology 1. Continual discernment—Past victories do not negate the need for present obedience (1 Corinthians 10:12). 2. Heeding unconventional messengers—God may confront us through unlikely voices (Luke 17:18-19). 3. Accepting limits—Recognizing sovereignty guards against overreach (James 4:13-16). Christological Trajectory Where Josiah failed, Jesus succeeded. The true Son of David always obeyed the Father’s voice—even unto death (Philippians 2:8)—thereby securing redemption for all who, like Josiah, often misuse freedom. The cross vindicates divine justice and mercy, offering regeneration that reshapes human willing (Ezekiel 36:26). Conclusion Josiah’s decision in 2 Chronicles 35:22 lays bare the dynamic of human free will: real, responsible, and yet encompassed by divine sovereignty. Scripture invites every reader to “choose this day” (Joshua 24:15), warning that liberty misused brings loss, while liberty surrendered to God’s revealed will leads to life everlasting. |
    |