Does Judges 21:24 suggest a resolution or continuation of conflict among the Israelites? Text of Judges 21:24 “At that time, the Israelites departed from there, each man to his tribe and family; and each man left from there to his inheritance.” Immediate Narrative Setting The tribes have just ensured the survival of Benjamin by supplying wives from Jabesh-gilead and Shiloh (21:1-23). Verse 24 functions as a narrative coda: the national assembly at Shiloh disperses, and the civil war that began in 19:1-20:48 is no longer active. The participants return to allotted inheritances first assigned under Joshua (Joshua 13–21), signalling the cessation of military mobilization. Literary Context and the “Cycle” of Judges While 21:24 records an outward resolution, 21:25 immediately adds, “In those days there was no king in Israel; everyone did what was right in his own eyes.” The editor juxtaposes the calm of verse 24 with a reminder that the deeper covenantal disorder persists. Thus the verse marks a situational resolution but, within the larger cyclical framework of Judges (sin-oppression-cry-deliverance-relapse), it foreshadows renewed instability. Historical-Archaeological Corroboration Iron I village-cluster excavations at sites traditionally assigned to Ephraim and Benjamin (e.g., Khirbet el-Maqatir, Ai region; Shiloh tel; and Khirbet Nisya) show no burn layers or weapon concentrations later than the settlement horizon that closely matches a 14th–13th century BC date (Ussher ~1378 BC). That absence of destruction layers after the war of Judges 19–20 supports a cessation of large-scale hostilities. Benjaminite territory reveals subsequent continuity, allowing for the rise of a Benjamite, Saul, only a few generations later (1 Samuel 9). Canonical Intertextual Evidence 1 Samuel begins with worship at Shiloh (1 Samuel 1:3) where the covenant assembly had just dispersed, implying normal national pilgrimage practices were restored. Later, thousands of Benjamites join David peacefully (1 Chronicles 12:1-7). Hosea 10:9 recalls “the days of Gibeah” as a warning, not a present reality, indicating the conflict was historically closed. Theological Significance Verse 24 exemplifies Yahweh’s preserving mercy: even after Israel’s self-inflicted violence, the covenant allotments remain. God’s faithfulness to the Abrahamic land promise (Genesis 15:18-21) is intact despite human failure. The dispersal anticipates the need for righteous kingship fulfilled ultimately in Christ, “the Lion of the tribe of Judah” (Revelation 5:5), whose reign alone ends the recurring chaos highlighted in Judges. Conclusion Judges 21:24 records an immediate resolution—the tribes disband and return home—while the following verse reminds readers that the underlying covenantal crisis continues until Israel receives a righteous king. Thus the verse portrays the end of that specific civil war yet simultaneously points to the need for a greater, lasting redemption. |
    |