What historical context is essential for understanding Ezekiel 20:28? Text “‘When I brought them into the land that I had sworn to give them and they saw every high hill and leafy tree, there they offered their sacrifices; they presented their provoking offerings, poured out their drink offerings, and there they offered up their soothing aroma.’ ” (Ezekiel 20:28) Prophetic Setting and Date Ezekiel delivered the oracle recorded in chapter 20 on the tenth day of the fifth month of the seventh year of King Jehoiachin’s exile (July 14, 591 BC). Jerusalem still stood but was under Babylonian domination; a first wave of exiles—including Ezekiel—had been deported in 597 BC, and a second, final destruction loomed (586 BC). Elders of the exilic community had come to inquire of Yahweh (20:1), hoping for reassurance. Instead, the prophet recounted Israel’s repeated rebellion in Egypt (vv. 5–9), in the wilderness (vv. 10–26), and—verse 28’s focus—after the nation entered Canaan. Covenantal Background: Entrance into Canaan God had covenanted to bring Abraham’s descendants into “a land flowing with milk and honey” (Exodus 3:17). After forty wilderness years, Joshua led the conquest (Joshua 1–12). Deuteronomy 12 commanded Israel to destroy Canaanite cult sites and centralize worship “in the place the LORD your God will choose.” Yet, by Judges 2:11–13 Israel quickly adopted Baal and Asherah worship. Ezekiel 20:28 reviews that disobedience: once settled, Israel gravitated to the very hills and groves Yahweh had marked for destruction. Religious Climate of Canaan High places (Heb. bamôt) and sacred trees were integral to Canaanite fertility cults. Baal (storm/fertility god) and Asherah (mother goddess) were venerated at open-air sanctuaries featuring stone pillars (masseboth), wooden poles (asherim), incense altars, and libations—precisely the activities Ezekiel lists. Archaeological parallels: • Tel Arad’s twin-horned incense altars (8th cent. BC) and standing stones illustrate Israelite use of high-place architecture despite Deuteronomic law. • Kuntillet ‘Ajrud inscriptions (early 8th cent. BC) read “Yahweh of Samaria and his Asherah,” evidence of syncretism. • The “Qitmit” shrine in Edom (7th cent. BC) yielded Judean cultic vessels amid domestic idols, showing how exilic Judeans still trafficked in forbidden worship. These finds corroborate Ezekiel’s charge that Israel practiced hybrid worship rather than pure covenant fidelity. Political Factors Reinforcing Idolatry Regional powers (Egyptian, Assyrian, and later Babylonian) endorsed local deities to secure vassal loyalty. Israelite kings routinely fortified political alliances by tolerating or promoting high places: Solomon’s late-life apostasy (1 Kings 11), Jeroboam I’s golden calves (1 Kings 12), Ahaz’s Damascus altar (2 Kings 16), and Manasseh’s rampant cultic revival (2 Kings 21). Ezekiel’s audience had lived through Manasseh’s reign and its enduring influence; their idolatrous heritage was recent history, not distant memory. Literary Structure and Legal Motif Chapter 20 reads as a covenant lawsuit. Verse 28 forms the climax of Exhibit C: settled-land rebellion. The repeated refrain “I acted for the sake of My name” (vv. 9, 14, 22) reveals Yahweh’s restraint; judgment is withheld but inevitable. The historical review validates God’s right to exile the nation yet also promises eventual restoration (vv. 33-44). Theological Implications 1. Human nature gravitates toward tangible, sensual worship, but true worship hinges on obedience, not geography or aesthetics. 2. Covenant blessings (the land) become occasions of sin when detached from covenant loyalty. 3. God’s patience in history highlights both His holiness and His relentless commitment to His redemptive plan—culminating in the Messiah’s resurrection centuries later, the ultimate vindication of His name. Practical Application Modern believers likewise inhabit cultures saturated with alternative “high places”: ideologies, pleasures, or self-exaltation. Ezekiel’s history lesson warns that inherited faith must be personally embraced and jealously guarded. Genuine worship rejects syncretism and centralizes devotion around the atoning work of the risen Christ. Summary Understanding Ezekiel 20:28 requires recognizing (1) the post-exilic audience still wrestling with ancestral idolatry, (2) the Canaanite fertility cult’s pervasive allure, (3) the political expediencies that normalized high-place worship, and (4) the prophet’s covenant-lawsuit framework. Against that backdrop, the verse exposes Israel’s heart betrayal the moment God fulfilled His promise of land, justifying the exile and foreshadowing a future, grace-fueled restoration. |
    |