Lessons on justice from Festus' choice?
What can we learn about justice from Festus' decision in Acts 25:25?

Setting the moment

Acts 25 opens with Festus, the new Roman governor, confronted by Jewish leaders determined to condemn Paul. After a careful hearing, Festus pronounces in verse 25:

“But I found he had done nothing deserving of death, and since he himself appealed to the Emperor, I decided to send him.”


Festus’ verdict: three truths on display

• Acknowledgement of innocence

• Recognition of legal boundaries (“since he himself appealed to the Emperor”)

• Decision consistent with Roman due process (“I decided to send him”)


Key observations about justice

• Thorough investigation precedes verdict

 — Luke 1:3 models the same careful inquiry; Proverbs 18:13 warns against hasty judgment.

• Impartiality despite pressure

 — Deuteronomy 16:19: “You shall not pervert justice… nor take a bribe.”

 — Festus resists the leaders’ agenda, echoing Exodus 23:2.

• Protection of the innocent

 — Proverbs 17:15 condemns acquitting the guilty and condemning the righteous; Festus refuses to condemn Paul.

• Right of appeal upheld

 — Acts 25:11 shows Paul invoking his citizenship; Romans 13:4 affirms governing authority as “an agent of justice.”

• Respect for limits of authority

 — Festus does not overstep Caesar’s jurisdiction, reflecting the principle of delegated authority (John 19:11).

• Written charges required

 — Acts 25:27: “For it seems unreasonable to send a prisoner without specifying the charges.” Justice must be transparent.


Scripture’s wider lens on righteous judgment

Luke 23:4; John 18:38 – Pilate also declares Jesus innocent, highlighting how earthly courts can recognize truth yet bow to pressure.

Psalm 82:3-4 – “Defend the weak and fatherless; uphold the cause of the poor and oppressed.” A judge’s duty extends beyond mere process to moral obligation.

Isaiah 1:17 – “Learn to do right; seek justice.” Festus provides a rare Roman glimpse of principled governance.


Living it out today

• Pursue facts before conclusions.

• Refuse favoritism, even when cultural or political pressures mount.

• Affirm legal safeguards—appeals, written charges, public hearings—as gifts from God for societal order.

• Recognize personal limits and honor proper channels; humility protects justice.

• Stand for the innocent, mirroring Christ’s own advocacy (1 John 2:1).

How does Acts 25:25 demonstrate God's sovereignty in Paul's legal situation?
Top of Page
Top of Page