Leviticus 7:26 & Acts 15:20: blood link?
What connections exist between Leviticus 7:26 and Acts 15:20 regarding blood consumption?

Setting the Two Verses Side by Side

Leviticus 7:26 – “Moreover, you must not eat the blood of any bird or animal in any of your dwellings.”

Acts 15:20 – “Instead we should write and tell them to abstain from food polluted by idols, from sexual immorality, from the meat of strangled animals, and from blood.”


Key Parallels to Notice

• Same core command: “do not eat blood.”

• Both speak with covenant authority—Leviticus from Sinai, Acts from the Jerusalem Council.

• Blood is treated as sacred in both settings, not as mere diet.

• The prohibition is presented to distinct audiences—Israel in the wilderness and Gentile believers among the nations—showing its continuing moral weight.


Why Blood Matters in Scripture

• Blood = life (Genesis 9:4; Leviticus 17:11)

• Blood reserved for atonement, foreshadowing Christ’s sacrifice (Hebrews 9:22; 1 Peter 1:18-19).

• Consuming blood would blur the God-ordained distinction between the sacred (life given back to God) and the common (food for the table).


From Sinai to Jerusalem: Tracing the Thread

1. Genesis 9:4 introduces the prohibition to Noah, long before the Law of Moses—indicating a universal principle.

2. Leviticus 7:26, 17:10-14 codify the rule for Israel under the sacrificial system.

3. Acts 15:20, 29 affirms the same standard for Gentile converts, alongside avoiding idolatry, sexual immorality, and strangled meat—all practices tied to pagan worship.

4. The Council highlights these particular commands because they:

• Guard new believers from idolatrous culture.

• Preserve table fellowship between Jewish and Gentile Christians.

• Uphold long-standing respect for God’s view of life.


Theological Links Between the Texts

• Sanctity of life: Both passages underline that life belongs to God; blood symbolizes that life.

• Anticipation of Christ: Old-Testament sacrifices looked ahead to “the precious blood of Christ” (1 Peter 1:19). Mishandling blood would cheapen that picture.

• One moral fabric: The New-Testament church, though free from ceremonial law’s burdens (Galatians 5:1), still embraces core moral revelations rooted in creation and atonement.


Practical Takeaways for Believers Today

• Reverence for life remains non-negotiable; casualness toward blood undermines that reverence.

• Freedom in Christ never cancels truths grounded in God’s character and redemptive plan.

• Christian unity sometimes means limiting personal liberty (1 Corinthians 8:9-13) to avoid offending consciences shaped by Scripture’s longstanding witness.

Why is abstaining from blood significant in understanding God's covenant with His people?
Top of Page
Top of Page