How does Luke 18:19 challenge the concept of inherent human goodness? Contextual Snapshot Luke 18:18-19 records: “A ruler questioned Him, ‘Good Teacher, what must I do to inherit eternal life?’ Jesus answered, ‘Why do you call Me good? No one is good except God alone.’” Set within Jesus’ Judean ministry, the exchange surfaces immediately after His parable contrasting a self-righteous Pharisee with a penitent tax collector (Luke 18:9-14) and before His affirmation that childlike dependence is requisite for entry into the kingdom (18:15-17). Luke deliberately arranges these events to expose differing attitudes toward personal merit. Jesus’ Self-Disclosure and the Divine Standard By redirecting attention to God alone as good, Jesus accomplishes two things simultaneously: 1. He invites the ruler to reassess Jesus’ own identity—if Jesus really is “good,” the only logical conclusion is that He is divine (cf. John 10:11, 14:9). 2. He exposes the chasm between God’s holiness and human moral ability. The ruler’s assumption that he can “do” something to earn eternal life betrays confidence in inherent goodness; Christ’s reply dismantles that premise. Canonical Harmony: Scripture’s Unified Verdict on Human Nature Old Testament • “There is no one who does good, not even one” (Psalm 14:3; 53:3). • “Surely there is no righteous man on earth who does good and never sins” (Ecclesiastes 7:20). New Testament • Jesus lists heart-born evils that defile a person (Mark 7:20-23). • Paul synthesizes the OT witness: “All have sinned and fall short of the glory of God” (Romans 3:23). The biblical narrative—from Adam’s fall (Genesis 3) to Israel’s repeated covenant failures (Judges 2; 2 Kings 17) and the universal indictment proclaimed by the prophets (Isaiah 64:6)—presents humanity as radically corrupted, not innately virtuous. Counter-Proposals Assessed 1. “Humans perform genuine altruistic acts, therefore must be inherently good.” Scripture acknowledges civic virtue (Romans 2:14-15) yet attributes it to common grace, not intrinsic purity. Mixed motives and inevitable moral lapses reveal the underlying flaw. 2. “Jesus denies His own goodness, so He too is not God.” The text is interrogative, not declarative. Elsewhere Jesus affirms His sinlessness (John 8:46) and oneness with the Father (John 10:30). The question functions to expose the ruler’s superficial address, not to repudiate Christ’s deity. Practical Implications for Evangelism and Discipleship Recognizing the bankruptcy of human goodness is essential to: • Cultivating humility—mirroring the tax collector’s plea, “God, be merciful to me, the sinner!” (Luke 18:13). • Dispelling works-based hopes—shifting focus from self-improvement to Christ’s finished work. • Encouraging gratitude—understanding that every good deed follows regeneration (Ephesians 2:10), not precedes it. Conclusion Luke 18:19 bluntly confronts the myth of inherent human goodness. By reserving ultimate goodness for God and challenging a merit-based approach to eternal life, Jesus exposes mankind’s moral insufficiency and directs all hope toward divine grace. The verse harmonizes perfectly with the sweeping testimony of Scripture, theological reflection, empirical observation, and sound philosophy: humanity’s only rescue from moral inability is the resurrected Christ, whose perfect goodness is freely credited to those who trust Him. |
    |