Mark 2:18: Jesus vs. tradition?
How does Mark 2:18 challenge traditional religious practices with Jesus' teachings?

Setting the Scene

Mark 2 records several encounters in which Jesus confronts prevailing religious expectations. Verse 18 focuses on fasting, a practice deeply embedded in Jewish piety and rigorously observed by both Pharisees and the disciples of John the Baptist.


Reading the Text

Mark 2:18: “Now John’s disciples and the Pharisees were fasting. So people came and asked Jesus, ‘Why is it that John’s disciples and the disciples of the Pharisees fast, but Yours do not?’”

(For context, verses 19-20 continue:) “Jesus replied, ‘Can the wedding guests fast while the bridegroom is with them? As long as he is with them, they cannot fast. But the time will come when the bridegroom will be taken from them; then they will fast in that day.’”


Traditional Practice Versus Present Reality

• Fasting had become a hallmark of religious seriousness. Pharisees practiced it twice a week (Luke 18:12).

• Observers assumed that any faithful teacher would require the same.

• Jesus’ apparent disregard challenged the notion that spirituality is measured primarily by visible ascetic disciplines.


Jesus’ Principle of Appropriateness

• The imagery of a wedding feast reframes fasting. Weddings are marked by joy, not by mourning or deprivation (cf. John 3:29).

• By calling Himself the “bridegroom,” Jesus identifies His presence as the decisive factor that governs practice.

• Spiritual disciplines are not ends in themselves; they serve relationship. When the Messiah is bodily present, celebration—not fasting—is fitting.

• Jesus affirms fasting (“then they will fast”) but on a new basis: it is meaningful in His physical absence after the ascension, not as a ritualistic badge of piety.


Authority Over Tradition

• Jesus places His own authority above the established norms of revered groups.

• Just as He later declares Himself “Lord even of the Sabbath” (Mark 2:28), He shows mastery over the timing and purpose of fasting.

Colossians 2:16-17 echoes this principle: “Therefore let no one judge you by what you eat or drink, or with regard to a religious festival, a New Moon, or a Sabbath.” The forms were “a shadow of the things to come,” but Christ is the substance.


Heart over Form

Isaiah 58 and Joel 2:12-13 expose fasting that is merely external. Jesus stands in the same prophetic line, insisting on authenticity.

Matthew 6:16-18 reinforces that fasting is to be done “in secret,” seeking the Father’s approval rather than human admiration.


Implications for Us Today

• Spiritual disciplines remain valuable, yet their timing and character are governed by relationship with the risen Christ.

• Joyful fellowship with Him may, at times, make outward displays of austerity inappropriate.

• Rituals are never to eclipse the Person they point to. Wherever Christ’s presence is celebrated, forms must yield to substance.

• Observance is evaluated by Scripture and Christ’s lordship, not by pressure from tradition or religious culture.


Further Scripture Connections

Romans 14:17 — “The kingdom of God is not eating and drinking, but righteousness, peace, and joy in the Holy Spirit.”

Acts 13:2-3 — The early church still fasted, but under the Spirit’s leading, not legal compulsion.

Revelation 19:7 — The Church ultimately joins the marriage supper of the Lamb, grounding all present joy in future consummation.

Mark 2:18 therefore challenges traditional religious practices by insisting that every discipline bends to the reality of Jesus’ presence, authority, and redemptive purpose.

Why did John's disciples and Pharisees fast, but Jesus' disciples did not?
Top of Page
Top of Page