Mark 7:8 vs Col 2:8 on traditions?
How does Mark 7:8 relate to Colossians 2:8 on human traditions?

Setting the Scene

Mark 7 opens with Pharisees fault-finding over ceremonial handwashing; Jesus answers with Isaiah 29:13, then adds, “You have disregarded the commandment of God and are holding to the tradition of men.” (Mark 7:8)

Colossians 2 addresses pressure from teachers who mixed Christianity with man-made rules about food, festivals, and mystical speculations. Paul warns, “See to it that no one takes you captive through philosophy and empty deception, which are based on human tradition and the elemental spiritual forces of the world rather than on Christ.” (Colossians 2:8)


What Both Verses Have in Common

• Same problem, different settings: religious leaders in Mark, encroaching ideologies in Colossians.

• Human tradition is portrayed as a rival authority that can eclipse God’s word.

• Both passages assume the sufficiency of divine revelation; anything that competes with it is dangerous.

• Each text frames the issue as captivity—either to Pharisaic legalism or to philosophical deception—rather than freedom in God’s truth (John 8:31-32).


Key Insights from Mark 7:8

• “Disregarded” (literally “left behind”) paints a picture of laying God’s command aside to grab something else.

• Traditions Jesus condemns are not all traditions, but those that contradict or annul Scripture (e.g., Corban loophole, Mark 7:9-13).

• The heart issue is worship: “They worship Me in vain” (Mark 7:7), showing that misplaced authority distorts devotion.


Key Insights from Colossians 2:8

• “Takes you captive” suggests kidnapping; false teaching enslaves minds.

• “Philosophy and empty deception” are hollow when measured against the fullness found in Christ (Colossians 2:9-10).

• “Elemental spiritual forces” hints at demonic or worldly systems that lie beneath human traditions, magnifying the danger (Ephesians 6:12).


Parallels and Contrasts

• Parallels

– Both confront additions to God’s word.

– Both affirm Scripture’s ultimate authority (Isaiah 8:20; 2 Timothy 3:16-17).

• Contrasts

– Mark addresses ritualistic legalism; Colossians tackles syncretistic philosophy.

– Mark’s audience is Jewish leadership; Colossians’ is a Gentile congregation.

Yet in both, the solution is identical: return to God’s revealed truth and the supremacy of Christ.


Implications for Today

• Measure every tradition—church, cultural, family—by explicit Scripture. If it contradicts or eclipses God’s commands, it must yield (Acts 17:11).

• Be alert to intellectual trends that sound profound yet shift trust away from Christ’s completed work (Galatians 1:6-9).

• Preserve gospel freedom: “Stand firm… do not let yourselves be burdened again by a yoke of slavery” (Galatians 5:1).

• Let Christ, not tradition, define identity and worship; “He is before all things, and in Him all things hold together” (Colossians 1:17).


Summary

Mark 7:8 and Colossians 2:8, though written to different audiences, issue a united call: reject human traditions that override or dilute God’s authoritative word, cling to the commands of God, and anchor faith solely in the all-sufficient Lord Jesus Christ.

What are examples of traditions that might 'set aside the commandment of God'?
Top of Page
Top of Page