How does Matthew 22:26 challenge the belief in resurrection? Text “In the same way, the third married her, and in the same way all seven died, leaving no children. ” (Matthew 22:26) Immediate Context: A Constructed Dilemma Matthew 22:23-28 records the Sadducees’ test case: a woman sequentially marries seven brothers under the Levirate law (Deuteronomy 25:5-6). Verse 26 rehearses the core of the scenario, heightening the supposed absurdity of resurrection by showing the woman legally bound to multiple husbands. The Sadducees believe the hypothetical proves bodily resurrection untenable. Historical Background: Who Were the Sadducees? First-century sources (Josephus, Antiquities 18.1.4; Acts 23:8) confirm the Sadducees’ denial of angels, spirits, and resurrection. They limited authority to the Torah, rejecting later prophetic and wisdom books. Thus their challenge is crafted to show that even within Moses the doctrine is unsustainable. Logical Form of the Objection 1. The Torah institutes Levirate marriage. 2. If resurrection exists, earthly marital bonds must continue. 3. A woman married to seven brothers would face polyandry in the age to come; such a condition violates Mosaic monogamy. ∴ Therefore resurrection is self-contradictory and impossible. Synoptic Parallels Reinforce Authenticity Mark 12:20-22 and Luke 20:29-31 present the same sequence, corroborating that the question circulated in early oral tradition. Early papyri (𝔓^45, c. AD 200) and codices Vaticanus (B) and Sinaiticus (ℵ) transmit the passage without substantive variance, underscoring textual stability. Jesus’ Rebuttal (Matthew 22:29-32) Jesus dismantles the dilemma on two fronts: 1. “You are in error because you do not know the Scriptures or the power of God.” (v. 29) – ignorance of canonical revelation and divine omnipotence. 2. “At the resurrection people will neither marry nor be given in marriage.” (v. 30) – the institution of marriage is temporary, rendering the Sadducees’ puzzle moot. Mosaic Proof of Resurrection Quoting Exodus 3:6, “I am the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob,” Jesus argues that Yahweh “is not the God of the dead, but of the living.” (v. 32) Present-tense εἰμι (“I am”) implies ongoing covenant fellowship; therefore, patriarchs still live awaiting bodily renewal. By anchoring resurrection in the Pentateuch, Jesus answers the Sadducees on their own canonical ground. Theological Clarification: Resurrection Ontology Resurrection is not mere resuscitation but glorification (1 Corinthians 15:42-44). Earthly institutions—marriage, civil government, sacrificial system—serve preparatory functions that terminate at consummation. Hence, post-resurrection life involves transformed relationships centered on direct communion with God (Revelation 21:3). Levirate Marriage: Temporary Typology The Levirate command preserved lineage and land inheritance, foreshadowing the Messiah who secures an eternal inheritance (Hebrews 9:15). Once the Seed has come (Galatians 3:16), the typological need ceases, further dissolving the Sadducean objection. Philosophical and Behavioral Considerations Personal identity persists through qualitative transformation: same self, new mode of existence. Contemporary grief research confirms that hope in bodily reunion mitigates despair and promotes virtuous living (1 Thessalonians 4:13). Without resurrection, moral motivation erodes (1 Corinthians 15:32). Archaeological and Textual Corroboration Ossuary inscriptions (e.g., “Yehosef bar Qayafa,” Caiaphas family tomb) validate the priestly aristocracy that included Sadducees, placing the narrative in a concrete historical milieu. Dead Sea Scroll fragments (4QExod-Lev) display the Exodus text with the same divine self-declaration Jesus cites, confirming its antiquity. Pastoral Implications Matthew 22:26 exposes common modern doubts: “What if my spouse remarries?” “What about blended families?” Jesus reassures believers that the coming age eclipses such temporal complexities with perfect fellowship and joy. Summary Matthew 22:26 does not undermine resurrection; it records an objection that Jesus decisively answers. The Sadducean dilemma collapses once one recognizes (1) marriage’s provisional nature and (2) God’s covenant faithfulness to the living. Manuscript reliability, archaeological context, philosophical coherence, and the power of God together affirm that the resurrection is certain, necessary, and gloriously free from the quandaries of this age. |
    |