What does 1 Corinthians 11:16 mean by "we have no other practice" regarding head coverings? Text of 1 Corinthians 11:16 “If anyone is inclined to dispute this, we have no other practice, nor do the churches of God.” Immediate Literary Context (1 Corinthians 11:2-15) Paul has just laid out a sustained argument: Christ is the head of every man; the man is the head of a woman; and God is the head of Christ (v. 3). He appeals to creation order (vv. 7-9), to nature’s testimony in hair length (vv. 14-15), and to the presence of angels in corporate worship (v. 10). Throughout, the apostle distinguishes men praying or prophesying with uncovered heads from women doing the same with covered heads, concluding that a woman’s covering is “a symbol of authority on her head” (v. 10). Verse 16 is the climactic seal on that teaching. Apostolic Authority and Universality Paul speaks in the plural (“we”) to include the apostolic circle and every recognized congregation: “nor do the churches of God.” This rhetorical doublet grounds the directive in two levels of authority—apostleship and catholic (universal) church usage. The construction echoes 1 Corinthians 4:17, where Paul sends Timothy “to remind you of my way of life in Christ Jesus, which is exactly what I teach everywhere in every church.” The same uniformity applies here: divergent head-covering practice is outside apostolic and ecclesial norms. Cultural Backdrop: Greco-Roman Head-Covering Etiquette In first-century Corinth, respectable Roman matrons wore a palla or veil in public; unveiled women were often identified with moral laxity. Men, conversely, generally worshiped with heads uncovered except in certain pagan rites. Paul neither capitulates to culture nor rejects it wholesale; he filters prevailing customs through creation theology, retaining those that harmonize with divinely intended male-female distinctions. Creation Order and Theological Rationale Paul’s primary justification is not social respectability but creational design. “Man did not come from woman, but woman from man; neither was man created for woman, but woman for man” (vv. 8-9; cf. Genesis 2:18-23). The covering becomes an outward recognition of that order. When he adds, “Nevertheless, in the Lord woman is not independent of man, nor is man independent of woman” (vv. 11-12), he safeguards mutual dependence while retaining functional distinctions. The Role of the Angels “Because of the angels” (v. 10) recalls Job 38:7, Isaiah 6:2, and Luke 15:10, passages depicting angels observing God’s works and worship. Head coverings signal to these heavenly witnesses that worship on earth mirrors God’s ordered glory in heaven. Hebrews 1:14 identifies angels as “ministering spirits sent to serve those who will inherit salvation,” implying their vested interest in reverent, orderly worship. Early Church Reception and Practice Tertullian, On the Veiling of Virgins 7 (A.D. ~200), insists, “The Corinthians themselves understood Paul to require full veiling.” Catacomb frescoes in Rome (2nd-3rd centuries) regularly depict women with veils in prayer posture, corroborating that churches beyond Corinth applied the passage literally. No patristic witness records an accepted alternative practice until millennia later. Custom versus Command: Distinguishing the Principle The head covering itself is a mutable symbol; the underlying principle—public, visible acknowledgment of gender-based headship—transcends time. Where head coverings no longer communicate that truth, a church may adopt an equivalent, but rejecting all external signification neglects Paul’s apostolic order. The text binds believers to the principle, and by extension to some unequivocal symbol. Application for Contemporary Assemblies 1. Each congregation must evaluate its cultural signals and retain a practice that unmistakably honors the creation-based headship order. 2. Men should avoid styles or accessories that feminize worship leadership; women should avoid masculinizing cues. 3. Whatever form the symbol takes, it must be public, consistent, and understood by the congregation as obedience to Scripture, not personal preference. Common Objections Addressed • “It was only cultural.” Paul’s appeals to creation, nature, and angels transcend culture. • “Hair is the covering.” Verse 6 distinguishes between cutting the hair and being covered, implying two layers: garment and hair. • “Verse 15 says her hair is given for a covering.” True, but that statement explains why an additional garment is fitting, not redundant; it appeals to nature to reinforce propriety (cf. vv. 6-7). • “Modern freedom in Christ abolishes such symbols.” Paul grounds liberty in orderly worship (1 Corinthians 14:33-40), never in discarding creational distinctions. Summary “We have no other practice” means that the apostles and every New Testament church recognized no alternative to gender-distinct head-covering observance in public worship. The statement finalizes Paul’s creation-rooted, angel-observed, church-wide mandate: visible symbols must honor the divine order of headship whenever men and women pray or prophesy together. |
    |