What does 1 Peter 2:21 mean by "Christ suffered for you"? Canonical Context 1 Peter addresses scattered believers facing slander, social exclusion, and the threat of official hostility (1 Peter 1:1; 4:12). Peter’s exhortation in 2:13–25 situates their unjust suffering within the pattern of Christ’s own passion. Verse 21 anchors the section: “For to this you were called, because Christ also suffered for you, leaving you an example, that you should follow in His footsteps” . Substitutionary Atonement Isaiah 53:4-6 prophesied a Servant who would bear our griefs; Peter cites this prophecy two verses later (2:24-25), explicitly connecting Christ’s suffering “on the tree” with our sins. The apostolic logic: 1. Human sin incurs the righteous wrath of a holy God (Romans 1:18; 3:23). 2. Divine justice requires a propitiatory sacrifice (Leviticus 17:11; Hebrews 9:22). 3. God provided His own Son as that sacrifice (Romans 3:25-26; 1 Peter 1:18-19). 4. Therefore Christ’s suffering was substitutionary—He experienced the penalty we deserved (2 Corinthians 5:21). Early creedal material corroborates this reading. The pre-Pauline confession of 1 Corinthians 15:3-4 (“Christ died for our sins”) uses the same huper construction, pre-dating the epistle by at least two decades. Multiple independent sources—Paul, Peter, Hebrews, the Synoptics—agree, satisfying the criterion of early, multiple attestation. Representative & Exemplary Suffering Though substitution is primary, Peter simultaneously presents Christ as model: “leaving you an example” (hupogrammon—an underwriting template). Believers called to endure unjust treatment mirror the pattern of the innocent Lamb (2:23). The dual thrust—redeemer and role-model—guards against a merely ethical or merely transactional gospel. The redeemed life is conformed to the Redeemer’s cross-shaped pattern (Philippians 1:29). Historical Grounding of Christ’s Suffering Outside the New Testament, Tacitus (Annals 15.44), Josephus (Ant. 18.64), and the Babylonian Talmud (b. Sanhedrin 43a) acknowledge Jesus’ crucifixion under Pontius Pilate. The burial, empty tomb, post-mortem appearances, and the disciples’ transformed boldness are established by the “minimal facts” approach and remain unexplained apart from bodily resurrection. Thus the suffering Peter references is not mythic but datable to Nisan 14, AD 30/33. Theological Payoff: “For You” 1. Propitiation: God’s wrath satisfied (Romans 5:9). 2. Redemption: slaves ransomed (1 Peter 1:18). 3. Reconciliation: hostility removed (Colossians 1:20-22). 4. Healing: “by His stripes you are healed” (1 Peter 2:24), encompassing ultimate resurrection wholeness and fore-tastes in providential healings documented throughout church history (e.g., Craig Keener, Miracles, vol. 2, ch. 15). Ethical Implications Believers respond by: • Enduring injustice without retaliation (2:23). • Doing good under human authority (2:13-17). • Blessing persecutors (3:9). Such conduct “silences the ignorance of foolish men” (2:15) and showcases the transformative power of the atonement. Pastoral Invitation Because the suffering was “for you,” the offer is personal. “Repent and believe the gospel” (Mark 1:15). Receive the pardon purchased at the cross, and take up the pattern of the Crucified. “To this you were called.” |
    |