What does Jesus mean by "I will not eat it again" in Luke 22:16? Text and Immediate Context “‘I have eagerly desired to eat this Passover with you before My suffering. For I tell you that I will not eat it again until it is fulfilled in the kingdom of God.’ ” (Luke 22:15-16) Luke places the statement at the climax of Jesus’ final Passover. The verb “eat” (Greek φάγω) refers to the Passover meal just begun. “Again” signals an interval; “until” (ἕως) introduces the terminus—the kingdom’s fulfillment. Passover Roots in the Hebrew Scriptures Passover commemorated deliverance from Egypt (Exodus 12). Every element—lamb, unleavened bread, wine—rehearsed redemption through substitutionary blood. Isaiah 53 and Jeremiah 31:31-34 foretell a Servant and a new covenant that surpass the Mosaic exodus. Jesus claims that nexus, transforming the Passover into the Lord’s Supper. Fulfillment in the Kingdom of God 1. Initial fulfillment: His crucifixion/resurrection inaugurates the kingdom (Acts 2:32-36). 2. Ongoing fulfillment: The church proclaims His death “until He comes” (1 Corinthians 11:26). 3. Final fulfillment: The eschatological banquet—“the marriage supper of the Lamb” (Revelation 19:9)—where He will once more share covenant food with redeemed humanity (cf. Isaiah 25:6-9). Eschatological Banquet in Second-Temple Expectation Jewish writings (4Q521, 1 Enoch 62, Sibylline Oracles 3) anticipate a messianic feast where Messiah and the righteous share bread and wine. Jesus appropriates this hope, declaring Himself host and Passover Lamb (Luke 22:19-20; John 1:29). Post-Resurrection Meals: Down-Payment of Promise After rising, Jesus eats fish and honeycomb (Luke 24:42-43; Acts 10:41). These meals confirm bodily resurrection and preview kingdom fellowship, yet they are not Passover; Luke omits any Passover lamb. Thus the promise of Luke 22:16 remains open, pointing forward. Covenantal Oath and New Exodus Motif By vowing abstention, Jesus assumes a Nazarite-like consecration (Numbers 6), dedicating Himself to death on behalf of many. His blood “of the covenant” (Luke 22:20) launches a new exodus (cf. Luke 9:31, ἔξοδος). The Lord’s Supper: Memorial and Anticipation Believers eat bread and drink the cup as a living memorial (ἀνάμνησις) and as rehearsal for future table fellowship. Early church witnesses—Didache 9-10; Justin, Apology I.67—echo Luke’s wording, reinforcing continuity. Common Objections Addressed Objection 1: “Jesus ate again on earth, contradicting His vow.” Response: He vowed regarding the Passover meal, not casual meals. The Greek pronoun αὐτό (“it”) points to the specific feast. Objection 2: “The kingdom came at Pentecost; promise fulfilled already.” Response: Scripture presents inaugurated-yet-not-consummated kingdom (Hebrews 2:8; Romans 8:23). Luke’s ‘until’ accommodates both phases, culminating in Revelation 19. Objection 3: “Symbolic myth.” Response: Early creed in 1 Corinthians 15:3-5 dates within five years of the crucifixion; resurrection eyewitness data convert hostile witnesses (Paul, James). Historical anchoring of Luke 22 stands firm. Practical and Pastoral Implications 1. Hope: Every Communion service is a foretaste of the royal banquet. 2. Holiness: Christ’s self-imposed fast calls believers to consecrated living. 3. Mission: The open seat at the future table motivates proclamation. Conclusion “I will not eat it again” signifies Jesus’ solemn vow that the Passover reaches its climactic realization only in the consummated kingdom. His coming death, resurrection, and return bracket the timeline: Lamb slain, church remembering, Messiah returning to eat anew with His people. |
    |