What does 1 Corinthians 7:25 mean by "I have no command from the Lord"? Canonical Placement and Verse Text “Now about virgins, I have no command from the Lord, but I give a judgment as one who by the Lord’s mercy is trustworthy.” (1 Corinthians 7:25) Immediate Context: Questions From Corinth The Corinthian believers had written Paul a list of inquiries (cf. 7:1 “Now concerning the things about which you wrote…”). One cluster concerned whether the unmarried (here called “virgins,” Greek parthenoi) should marry while the congregation faced persecution and famine (cf. 7:26 “because of the present distress”). Earlier in the chapter Paul had quoted Jesus’ recorded teaching on marriage permanence (7:10–11 “not I, but the Lord”), yet on this specific point—whether never–married believers should now marry—no direct saying of Jesus was available from the Gospel tradition. Jesus’ Recorded Teachings and the Absence of a Dominion Saying During His earthly ministry Jesus addressed divorce (Matthew 19:3–9; Mark 10:1–12) and voluntary celibacy for the kingdom (Matthew 19:12) but did not issue a universal mandate on whether previously unmarried believers should marry in times of crisis. Therefore, Paul cannot cite a dominical logion (“word of the Lord”), unlike in 7:10–11. His honesty upholds inerrancy: he neither fabricates a saying nor overstates his sources. Paul’s Apostolic Authority and Inspiration 1 Corinthians itself claims Spirit-wrought authority: “If anyone thinks himself a prophet or spiritual, let him recognize that the things I write to you are the Lord’s command.” (14:37) Peter likewise brackets Paul’s letters with “the other Scriptures” (2 Peter 3:16). Thus, while 7:25 is not a quotation of Jesus’ earthly words, it is still canonical, God-breathed instruction (2 Timothy 3:16), preserved in early papyri such as P46 (c. AD 175–225) and codices ℵ and B, confirming the integrity of the text. The “Present Distress” and Pastoral Wisdom Paul frames his counsel within “the present distress” (7:26) and the imminence of greater trials (7:29–31). Remaining single would spare believers additional anxieties and liabilities should persecution intensify. Nonetheless, marriage remains honorable (7:28) and a guard against immorality (7:2). His approach models situational pastoral care without surrendering timeless principle. Distinction Between Moral Command and Apostolic Counsel • Moral absolutes (e.g., fidelity in marriage) derive from explicit dominical or Old Testament commands. • Apostolic counsel (gnōmē) addresses prudential choices where Scripture gives liberty. Both are inspired, yet the counsel allows for differing conscientious applications: “If you do marry, you have not sinned” (7:28). Paul neither binds where God has not bound nor ignores the Spirit’s wisdom for a specific epoch. Corroborating Scriptural Cross-References • Romans 14:5 “Each one should be fully convinced in his own mind.” • Proverbs 15:22 “Plans fail without counsel, but with many advisers they succeed.” • Acts 15:28 “It seemed good to the Holy Spirit and to us…”—another model of Spirit-guided apostolic judgment. Early Church Reception and Manuscript Witness Clement of Alexandria cited 1 Corinthians 7 as apostolic precedent for voluntary celibacy, yet still defended marriage as divinely instituted. Tertullian noted Paul’s “no command” language to defend Christian liberty. The wide geographic spread of the earliest manuscripts (P46 in Egypt, 𝔓12 in Fayum, early Latin and Syriac versions) attests to immediate acceptance of the passage as Scripture despite its “opinion” wording. Practical Implications for Contemporary Believers 1. Recognize categorical difference between timeless moral law and context-specific counsel. 2. Seek the Spirit’s wisdom through prayer, Scripture, and mature counsel when making life-shaping decisions not explicitly addressed by Christ’s recorded words. 3. Understand singleness and marriage as equally honorable callings; neither is a lesser path when pursued in faith and purity. Conclusion “I have no command from the Lord” means Paul lacked a direct saying of Jesus on this narrow question, not that his teaching lacks divine authority. Inspired by the Spirit, he provides trustworthy, situational counsel that upholds Christian freedom while steering believers toward undivided devotion to Christ amid trial. |
    |