Naomi's advice: cultural norms?
What cultural norms are reflected in Naomi's advice to her daughters-in-law?

Naomi’s Heartfelt Counsel in Ruth 1:11

“But Naomi replied, ‘Return home, my daughters. Why would you go with me? Are there still sons in my womb to become your husbands?’”


Cultural Expectation of Levirate Marriage

• Naomi alludes to the practice commanded in Deuteronomy 25:5-10, where a deceased brother’s wife was to marry the next male kin so the family line would continue.

• By saying, “Are there still sons in my womb…?” she signals that, under normal circumstances, Orpah and Ruth could expect her future sons to fulfill this duty.

• Other examples:

Genesis 38:6-11 (Tamar and Judah’s sons)

Matthew 22:24, where the Sadducees cite the same law.

• Since Naomi is past childbearing age, the levirate option is gone; she urges the young women to seek husbands elsewhere.


The High Value Placed on Lineage

• Ancient Israel treasured the preservation of a man’s name and estate (cf. Numbers 27:1-11; Ruth 4:5-10).

• Children were viewed as God’s covenant blessing (Psalm 127:3-5).

• Without sons, Elimelech’s line appeared extinguished; Naomi feels responsible but powerless to remedy that loss.


Women’s Security Through Marriage

• In patriarchal society, widows had limited economic options (Deuteronomy 24:19-22 encourages gleaning as relief).

• A husband meant:

◦ Provision (food, land, shelter)

◦ Protection from exploitation (Isaiah 1:17)

◦ Social status and “rest” (Ruth 1:9).

• Naomi releases Orpah and Ruth so they can pursue the accepted path to stability.


The Pull of National and Family Identity

• “Return home” echoes the norm that a widow would revert to her father’s household (Genesis 38:11).

• Remaining in Moab would align the women with their native gods, customs, and kinship networks—far less risky than relocating as foreigners (Ruth 2:10).

• Naomi assumes they will prefer familiar cultural surroundings over uncertain life in Bethlehem.


Grace Within the Norms

• Though bound by cultural conventions, Naomi’s advice flows from selfless love: she forfeits her own companionship for her daughters-in-law’s welfare (Philippians 2:4).

• Her realistic appraisal of the era’s expectations highlights God’s later providence; Ruth’s counter-cultural loyalty opens the door for Boaz’s redemption (Ruth 4:13-17), culminating in the lineage of David and, ultimately, the Messiah (Matthew 1:5-6).

How does Ruth 1:11 demonstrate Naomi's selflessness and concern for her daughters-in-law?
Top of Page
Top of Page