How does Nehemiah 13:28 address the issue of intermarriage with foreign nations? Text of Nehemiah 13:28 “One of the sons of Joiada son of Eliashib the high priest was son-in-law to Sanballat the Horonite; so I drove him away from me.” Immediate Literary Context Nehemiah 13 records Nehemiah’s second term as governor (ca. 432–425 BC) after a brief return to King Artaxerxes’ court (13:6-7). During his absence, three covenant breaches surfaced: commerce on the Sabbath (13:15-22), neglect of the Levites (13:10-14), and intermarriage with foreign women (13:23-29). Verse 28 isolates the gravest case—an alliance linking the high-priestly family to Sanballat, the sworn enemy who had opposed the rebuilding of Jerusalem’s wall (Nehemiah 2:10; 4:1-3). Historical Setting: Sanballat and the Samarian Schism Sanballat the Horonite governed Samaria under the Persian satrapy. The Elephantine papyri (AP 302; ca. 407 BC) mention his sons Delaiah and Shelemiah mediating for the Jewish garrison in Egypt, confirming his historicity and priestly entanglements. Josephus (Ant. 11.302) later notes a son-in-law named Manasseh founding a rival temple on Mount Gerizim—an event foreshadowed by Nehemiah’s expulsion. Mosaic Prohibitions Against Intermarriage Deuteronomy 7:3-4; Exodus 34:11-16; and Joshua 23:12-13 forbid covenant Israel from marrying people “who serve other gods.” The rationale is theological, not ethnic: “they will turn your sons away from following Me” (De 7:4). Ezra had already enforced the law a generation earlier (Ezra 9–10). By marrying Sanballat’s daughter, a priestly descendant of Aaron violated both the national command and the stricter priestly code requiring “he shall take a wife in her virginity, of his own people” (Leviticus 21:13-14). Priestly Purity and Messianic Lineage As grandson of Eliashib, the offender stood in line for the high-priesthood. Tainted lineage would imperil both temple service and the genealogical integrity through which messianic promises (Genesis 49:10; 2 Samuel 7:12-16) were preserved. Nehemiah’s expulsion mirrors earlier purges of priests with foreign wives (Ezra 10:18-22) to secure unbroken Aaronic succession (cf. Nehemiah 12:26). Covenant Rationale, Not Ethnic Prejudice Nehemiah’s action targets apostasy, not ethnicity. Ruth the Moabitess and Rahab the Canaanite were welcomed once they embraced Yahweh (Ruth 1:16; Joshua 2:11). The difference lies in allegiance to the covenant God. Mixing with persistent idolaters threatened doctrinal drift, as Solomon’s “foreign wives turned his heart after other gods” (1 Kings 11:4). Nehemiah’s Disciplinary Procedure 1. Investigation (13:23-24): Children speaking “half in the language of Ashdod.” 2. Rebuke and covenant reminder (13:25-27). 3. Excommunication (13:28): “I drove him away” (gāraštî). Under Persian rule Nehemiah lacked capital authority but exercised temple banishment, cutting the priest off from office and community until repentance. Prophetic Echoes Malachi, prophesying in the same decade, indicts Judah for “marrying the daughter of a foreign god” and calls for cutting off “the man who does this, whether teacher or student” (Malachi 2:11-12). The prophet and governor thus form a united front, Scripture interpreting Scripture. Archaeological Corroboration • Elephantine Papyri corroborate Sanballat’s existence and cross-regional marriage ties. • Wadi Daliyeh papyri (4th c. BC) list Samaritan nobles linked to Sanballat’s house. • Samaria ostraca reveal a mixed Yahwistic-pagan cult in the north, validating fears of syncretism. • Dead Sea Scroll fragment 4Q117 matches the MT of Nehemiah, attesting textual reliability. New Testament Continuity The apostolic era reaffirms the principle: “Do not be unequally yoked with unbelievers” (2 Corinthians 6:14) and “she is free to marry whomever she wishes, only in the Lord” (1 Corinthians 7:39). While the gospel now transcends ethnic boundaries (Galatians 3:28), the spiritual yoke remains non-negotiable. Theological Implications 1. Holiness: God’s people must remain distinct to reflect His character (Leviticus 20:26). 2. Leadership Integrity: Spiritual leaders are judged more strictly (James 3:1). 3. Corporate Responsibility: One family’s compromise jeopardizes the whole covenant community (cf. Joshua 7). Practical Applications Today • Believers contemplating marriage must prioritize shared faith over cultural compatibility. • Church leaders should guard doctrinal purity while extending grace-filled restoration to the repentant (Galatians 6:1). • Inter-church or parachurch partnerships ought to evaluate theological common ground to avoid syncretism. Conclusion Nehemiah 13:28 serves as a case study in covenant fidelity. By expelling the priest allied with Sanballat, Nehemiah upheld Mosaic law, protected priestly lineage, and foiled a nascent Samaritan schism. The verse underscores a timeless principle: relational covenants that compromise allegiance to the living God must be confronted for the health of God’s people and the glory of His name. |
    |