Why did Nehemiah expel the grandson of Eliashib in Nehemiah 13:28? Historical Setting: Post-Exilic Jerusalem and Nehemiah’s Second Visit (ca. 432 BC) Nehemiah 13 narrates events after Nehemiah’s return to Artaxerxes I and his subsequent journey back to Jerusalem. During his absence, compromises crept into Judah’s civil and priestly leadership, threatening the renewed covenant community rebuilt since 538 BC. His expulsion of Eliashib’s grandson is the climactic act in a series of corrective measures (Nehemiah 13:4-31). Who Was Eliashib and Why Does His Household Matter? Eliashib was the high priest (Nehemiah 3:1; 13:4). As spiritual leader, his household was expected to model covenant fidelity (Leviticus 21:6-8). The grandson in question is “the son-in-law of Sanballat the Horonite” (Nehemiah 13:28). Because priests inherited both office and influence, corruption inside this family threatened nationwide apostasy (cf. Malachi 2:1-9). The Offense: Intermarriage With Sanballat’s Line Sanballat was the Samaritan governor (Elephantine Papyri, Cowley 30; Josephus, Antiquities 11.302-325). He led earlier oppositions (Nehemiah 2:19; 4:1-3). By marrying Sanballat’s daughter, Eliashib’s grandson formed a political-religious alliance that undermined Jerusalem’s purity and opened priestly succession to syncretism. Ezra faced a similar crisis thirteen years earlier (Ezra 9–10). Covenant Law Against Such Unions “Do not intermarry with them… for they will turn your sons away from following Me” (Deuteronomy 7:3-4; cf. Exodus 34:12-16). Priests had stricter limits (Leviticus 21:13-15; Ezekiel 44:22). The grandson’s marriage violated explicit terms of the Mosaic Law and the communal oath renewed in Nehemiah 10:28-30. Thus Nehemiah “drove him away” (Nehemiah 13:28). Theological Principle: Holiness and Leadership Accountability Israel’s survival depended on separation from idolatry (Leviticus 20:26). Leaders bear greater judgment (James 3:1). By removing a compromised priest, Nehemiah protected temple sanctity (Numbers 3:10) and upheld God’s holiness standard exemplified earlier by Phinehas (Numbers 25:7-13). Precedents and Parallels • Phinehas’ zeal (Numbers 25) • Ezra’s enforced divorces (Ezra 10) • Malachi’s rebuke of priestly treachery (Malachi 2:11-12) Each highlights decisive action to preserve covenant integrity. Purging for the Sake of Worship Nehemiah’s action protected: 1. The genealogical purity of the priesthood (Ezra 2:62; Nehemiah 7:64-65). 2. The exclusivity of Yahweh worship (Deuteronomy 6:13-15). 3. The nation’s witness to surrounding peoples (Isaiah 49:6). Practical Implications for Modern Readers • Spiritual leadership demands uncompromised loyalty to Christ (2 Corinthians 6:14-18). • Holiness is communal; private sin can defile the body of believers (1 Corinthians 5:6-7). • Zealous discipline, executed biblically, restores rather than destroys (Matthew 18:15-17; Galatians 6:1). Conclusion Nehemiah expelled Eliashib’s grandson because the marriage to Sanballat’s daughter flagrantly violated Torah, jeopardized priestly purity, and threatened covenant continuity. His swift, decisive response safeguarded the community’s holiness, protected temple worship, and modeled godly leadership committed to Scripture above political convenience. |
    |