How does Paul's personal greeting in 1 Corinthians 16:21 affect the letter's authenticity? Historical Function of an Autographic Line In the Greco-Roman world a dictator’s or philosopher’s “autograph” line was the standard means of certifying that what preceded was truly his communication. Paul consciously employs the convention (cf. Galatians 6:11; Colossians 4:18; 2 Thessalonians 3:17), making the line in 1 Corinthians the ancient equivalent of a notarized signature. Scribal Practices and the Use of an Amanuensis The lengthy, carefully structured argumentation of 1 Corinthians shows the hand of an amanuensis. Paul’s habit was to dictate (Romans 16:22 identifies Tertius as the scribe). When the dictation ended, Paul would take the pen, add a brief greeting in his distinctive script, and return the scroll. This explains the abrupt, personal insertion after a dictated conclusion (1 Colossians 16:19–20). The practice harmonizes with every uncontested Pauline letter and is absent from the acknowledged pseudepigrapha, supporting authenticity. Internal Literary Marks 1. Vocabulary: The self-identifying words “ἐγὼ Παῦλος” appear in undisputed letters (Galatians 5:2; 2 Corinthians 10:1; Philemon 19). 2. The formula “in my own hand” (τῇ ἐμῇ χειρί) recurs (Galatians 6:11; Colossians 4:18), forming a unique Pauline fingerprint. 3. Emotional tone: After pages of pastoral counsel, a sudden switch to the first-person singular underscores authorial immediacy, a hallmark of Paul rather than a later redactor. External Manuscript Evidence • P46 (c. AD 200), 𝔓^11, 𝔓^14, and the fourth-century uncials ℵ (Sinaiticus) and B (Vaticanus) all preserve the verse without variation. • No extant manuscript omits or relocates the line, indicating it was present in the archetype. • Subscriptions in Codex Vaticanus and Alexandrinus read “written from Philippi through Stephanas, Fortunatus, Achaicus and Timothy,” paralleling Paul’s own closing, not a forger’s. Early Patristic Reception Clement of Rome (c. AD 95), Polycarp (c. 110), and Irenaeus (c. 180) quote 1 Corinthians as Pauline with no hint of doubt. Had the signature been an after-thought it would have generated the same suspicion 3 Peter later did; instead it strengthened acceptance. Form-Critical Corroboration Letters signed by the author at the end (Greek, hypographē) also appear in private papyri (e.g., P.Oxy. 219, 270 [1st–2nd cent.]). The Corinthians, living in a city rife with forged financial documents (cf. Acts 18:12-16), would instinctively read Paul’s handwriting as legal proof. Theological and Pastoral Weight By authenticating authorship, the greeting ensures the preceding instruction on resurrection (ch. 15) is apostolic, not hearsay. Because saving faith rests on a historical, bodily risen Christ (15:3-8), validating the messenger validates the message. Philosophical Consistency If God communicates objective revelation, He will providentially safeguard its human vessels. A verifiable signature manifests that safeguarding at the human level, aligning with the doctrine of preservation (Isaiah 40:8). Conclusion Paul’s brief autograph in 1 Corinthians 16:21 operates as an authenticating seal rooted in established scribal custom, corroborated by unbroken manuscript testimony, early church reception, and internal stylistic hallmarks. Consequently, the verse functions as a linchpin confirming that the entire epistle is the genuine product of the apostle whose eyewitness testimony to the resurrected Christ grounds its authority and, by extension, the believer’s assurance of salvation. |
    |